Spacelift vs nOps comparison

nOps.io and Spacelift are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. nOps.io is ranked #26 with an average rating of 10.0, while Spacelift is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0. nOps.io holds a 0.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Spacelift’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of nOps.io users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spacelift users who would recommend it.

nOps

Read 4 nOps reviews

249 Views
207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spacelift

Read 5 Spacelift reviews

605 Views
490 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

nOps

Spacelift

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

nOps and Spacelift are competing products in cloud infrastructure management. nOps has the upper hand in cost management features based on its strong alignment with financial objectives, while Spacelift is favored for robust automation and integration capabilities that enhance DevOps processes.

Features: nOps offers features such as cost optimization for AWS savings plans, security compliance to ensure operational integrity, and detailed visibility into AWS environment operations. Spacelift includes infrastructure as code for seamless configuration management, automated workflows to simplify DevOps pipelines, and integration capabilities that enable smooth connections with various tools.

Room for Improvement: nOps could benefit from expanding its services beyond AWS-specific environments, enhancing its multi-cloud support, and refining its real-time monitoring features. Spacelift can improve by offering more intuitive user guidance, broadening its policy compliance features, and enhancing customer feedback mechanisms to streamline its user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: nOps provides an intuitive setup for AWS-centric environments, with comprehensive documentation and prompt support for deployment inquiries. It primarily assists businesses focused on AWS operations. Spacelift facilitates quick configuration for DevOps needs, offering compatibility with various cloud providers and supporting CI/CD process streamlining, which gives it an advantage in agility.

Pricing and ROI: nOps has a moderate setup cost, but it significantly enhances ROI over time through its cost optimization features, delivering immediate financial benefits. Spacelift requires a higher initial investment, offering considerable ROI by increasing efficiency and saving time in automated processes. nOps appeals with its immediate cost benefits, whereas Spacelift provides value through operational improvements and automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Spacelift vs. nOps Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Spacelift vs. nOps

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

nOps

Ranking in Cloud Management

26th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spacelift

Ranking in Cloud Management

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (18th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of nOps is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spacelift is 1.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Spacelift	1.2%
nOps	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tom Weeks

Sr. Director of Engineering at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Automates savings plan management and improves cost visibility while reducing cloud infrastructure needs

I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool. Its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it. I get it set up, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf. This frees my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts. It also provides a dashboard with more detailed insights into cost and AWS cloud costs than what comes out of the box with AWS Cost Explorer. Third, the nOps Kubernetes agent automatically resizes pods based on usage, which allows us to run significantly fewer EC2 instances than we would otherwise. nOps has positively impacted my organization by saving both time and money.

Read full review

Sudheer Kumar Jamjam

Technical Lead Cloud DevOps Engineer at Deloitte

Everything can be visibly managed, scheduling and state management features are pretty good

We've integrated it with source control management tools like GitLab and Bitbucket. The scheduling and state management features are pretty good using Spacelift. It integrates with tools like Terraform and Kubernetes for policies, but we haven't worked on the compliance part. Spacelift streamlines collaboration among our development and operations teams. We use it for CI/CD as well. It can handle automation strategies. Whenever you put your YAML files and integrate them with Spacelift, it will scan the code and show where you need to make changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it—once set up, it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team to work on more valuable tasks without missing out on discounts."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team to work on more valuable tasks without losing out on discounts."

"nOps smoothly integrated with our AWS infrastructure and achieved significant savings without much intervention from our internal team."

"One customer saved 35 percent on their cloud bill, which is pretty significant."

"The solution provides actionable reporting and cost-saving recommendations."

"Spacelift is like an extension of Terraform, where everything can be visibly managed."

"I appreciate that I just have to connect to my AWS account with my credentials, and Spacelift handles the rest."

"Knowing the HashiCorp Configuration Language (HCL) makes it easier to use without issues."

"One key feature is the Spacelift policies, which we can attach to deployments to ensure compliance with our standards."

"A valuable feature of Spacelift is that you can attach labels, and it is a modernized tool for infrastructure deployments. It is pull request-based, and you can see all the Terraform plan and apply logs on the pull request itself, which is not available across any other CI/CD tools."

Cons

"I suggest improving the heat map capability with the option to use showback values as the x and y-axis."

"From the features, I would like to see RDS RIs and maybe better visibility on how the engine is deciding whether to use spot or on demand, to replace the instance or not"

"The customer support is lacking but still pretty good."

"Synchronization can be difficult when using older and newer versions with Kubernetes and HashiCorp."

"If you are a small enterprise organization, below 500 people, I would not recommend it."

"In the free version, there's no straightforward way to be notified once a deployment is finished."

"The self-hosted version does not have a lot of features compared to the SaaS version, such as cloud integrations for Azure and GCP."

"Spacelift currently lacks features that can help with complex type deployments and coordination for major deployments."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a bit expensive product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for nOps?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy, and it was also brokered by us with the client. I did not purchase nOps through the AWS Marketplace.

See all answers

What needs improvement with nOps?

nOps can be improved by having their account managers be more responsive and treat customers that are tail spend a little bit better than enterprise customers. I understand that smaller customers s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for nOps?

My main use case for nOps is cost savings. A quick, specific example of how I use nOps for cost savings is through their automated cost savings feature. This involves automated management of saving...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spacelift?

I've never checked the pricing because I enjoy using it for free. Besides the notification feature, I haven't needed any paid features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spacelift?

There are a few areas for improvement. For instance, getting notification webhooks is not easy. In the free version, there's no straightforward way to be notified once a deployment is finished. Spa...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spacelift?

I use Spacelift to deploy my applications, particularly AWS applications and infrastructure to my personal AWS account.

See all answers

Comparisons

Spot by Flexera vs nOps

Compared 56% of the time

Zesty vs nOps

Compared 44% of the time

More nOps Competitors

env zero vs Spacelift

Compared 50% of the time

Scalr vs Spacelift

Compared 32% of the time

HPE OneSphere vs Spacelift

Compared 9% of the time

Morpheus vs Spacelift

Compared 9% of the time

More Spacelift Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download nOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Spacelift

January 2026

Download Spacelift product report

Also Known As

nOps - Cloud Optimization Platform

No data available

Overview

nOps is a robust tool that excels in managing AWS infrastructure by offering cost optimization, performance monitoring, compliance tracking, and change management. Users praise its real-time monitoring, user-friendly dashboard, and actionable insights that enhance operational efficiency, reduce expenses, and ensure compliance. nOps significantly improves productivity, collaboration, and strategic decision-making across organizations.

nOps.io

Spacelift provides a sophisticated infrastructure management platform with key features such as Drift Detection and Terraform integration, simplifying complex deployments and enhancing user workflows through an intuitive interface.

Spacelift excels in modernizing infrastructure management by integrating smoothly with Terraform, using a pull request-based approach for visibility into logs. It automates change detection using GitOps from GitHub and supports AWS connectivity with credential management. Despite its strengths, some users find room for improvement in supporting smaller enterprises and offering more seamless cloud integrations with self-hosted versions. Handling of HashiCorp Vault secrets and cumbersome notification webhooks may require additional setup effort.

What are the most valuable features?

Drift Detection: Ensures user edits are managed effectively, reducing configuration discrepancies.
Terraform Integration: Seamless compatibility with Terraform for robust infrastructure management.
GitOps: Automates change detection from GitHub, ensuring efficient workflows.
Compliance Policies: Helps maintain infrastructure within regulatory guidelines.
Stack Execution: Enables runs with label attachments for organized operations.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Improved Deployment Control: Default plan prompts support structured and controlled deployments.
Streamlined Terraform Management: Enhanced visibility into logs aids in transparent and efficient operations.
Efficient AWS Interactions: Credential management simplifies connections, making operations more fluid.
Dynamic Infrastructure Handling: Supports significant projects by replacing tools like Terraform Enterprise.

In specific industries, Spacelift is primarily utilized for infrastructure management and deployment across platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP. In banking architecture, it replaces Terraform Enterprise, ensuring secure and efficient operations. Projects like Google Fiber benefit from its capability to import and manage data effectively, engaging users with HashiCorp Language and GitHub for CI/CD integration.

Free Report: Spacelift vs. nOps

Find out what your peers are saying about Spacelift vs. nOps and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Spacelift vs. nOps report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.