Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs SHIELD comparison

NICE and SHIELD are both solutions in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category. NICE is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7, while SHIELD is ranked #12 with an average rating of 3.0. NICE holds a 6.4% mindshare in FDP, compared to SHIELD’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of NICE users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SHIELD users who would recommend it.

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...

Read 17 Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management reviews

2,128 Views
758 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SHIELD

Read 1 SHIELD review

268 Views
135 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...

SHIELD

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management and SHIELD based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.

To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fraud Detection and Prevention

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 853,118 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authe...

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SHIELD

Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention

12th

Average Rating

3.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is 6.4%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SHIELD is 1.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Fraud Detection and Prevention

Featured Reviews

Jahnavi Koppala

Actimize Developer at Infosys

A good designer for the UI, stable, and scalable

I give the solution a ten out of ten. Unlike other technologies, Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is partially pre-built, making it easy to understand what needs to be done and how to complete the work. Furthermore, due to the pre-existing code, there is no need to start from scratch, providing a better understanding of the current situation and what needs to be implemented. Our organization moved to Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management because the solution is an upgraded version and also it provides many benefits as we can easily activate rules. Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is very convenient and it provides easy access to everything. When utilizing the solution for the first time, always start with a lower environment such as a development environment. Only use Dell and SIT, and do not go directly to production. The solution may have an impact on the bank and large transactions.

Read full review

reviewer2561490

Head of Innovation at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Effective fraud prevention but expensive

We are using SHIELD as the end user for our gaming platform to prevent fraud with our gamers Earlier, there were multiple instances of security issues, like fraud where users were playing with each other and using multiple accounts to redeem cashbacks. Fraud prevention has helped us reduce these…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."

"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."

"The alerts are the most valuable feature because we have different alerts. Different data is fed to Actimize. It alerts us if a transaction happened from a certain place."

"The tool helped my clients track some fraudulent activities which couldn’t have been possible without the solution. Once the solution is deployed, the system of the client needs to be upgraded and overhauled to reflect the new system. The end users can see the benefits of it. The integration of the solution is increasing the customer base of our clients since more customers from other banks have decided to join the client bank due to the level of security."

"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."

"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."

"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."

"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management pros

"We find the device fingerprinting feature valuable."

Cons

"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."

"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."

"It is complex in terms of daily maintenance. Other detection platforms run on a 15-day or one-month window, whereas this particular platform runs daily. Therefore, it requires daily maintenance. If there is a delay due to this daily maintenance, it creates a snowball effect impacting the subsequent days. It takes a lot of effort to catch up and get into BAU mode. It would be great if they could include certain features to make the daily processing less complex, but I don't see that happening. It is a complex product, and with each version release, it is just becoming more and more complex."

"The patch section has room for improvement."

"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."

"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."

"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."

"Processes don't function when front end is down."

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management cons

"It is a costly solution since they charge based on MAU."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."

"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."

"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."

"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."

"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

853,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

44%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Wholesaler/Distributor

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SHIELD?

The solution is too expensive. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate it nine or ten in terms of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SHIELD?

It is a costly solution since they charge based on MAU. We want to optimize the cost for our platform, and the high cost is the only problem we have with SHIELD.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SHIELD?

We are using SHIELD as the end user for our gaming platform to prevent fraud with our gamers.

See all answers

Comparisons

Verafin Fraud Detection and Management vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 20% of the time

BAE Systems NetReveal vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 17% of the time

FICO Falcon Platform vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 16% of the time

ThreatMetrix vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Safer Payments vs Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

Compared 9% of the time

More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Competitors

Fingerprint vs SHIELD

Compared 50% of the time

SEON Fraud Prevention vs SHIELD

Compared 29% of the time

ThreatMetrix vs SHIELD

Compared 21% of the time

More SHIELD Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management

May 2025

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management report

Download Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Fraud Detection and Prevention

May 2025

Download SHIELD product report

Also Known As

Actimize, NICE Actimize

No data available

Overview

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management facilitates fast data processing and effective transaction monitoring with customizable alert rules, offering robust support for compliance and security needs.

Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management integrates efficiently into existing systems, processing substantial transaction volumes with responsive data handling, alert generation, and detailed reporting. Its adaptive rule engine simplifies customization, eliminating the need for development assistance. Clients benefit from automation, comprehensive case management, and a comprehensive dashboard, enhancing fraud detection and user engagement. Despite its strengths, areas needing improvement include front-end dependency management, integration capabilities, and intuitive updates.

What are the key features?

Fast Data Loading: Quickly processes large transaction volumes.
Alert Generation: Customizable alerts for proactive fraud detection.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed and accessible reports.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy navigation and management.
Case Management: Effective oversight for compliance activities.
Robust Rule Engine: Customization without developer input.
Wide Database Support: Integrates seamlessly with different systems.
Automation: Enhances efficiency and security measures.
Flexible Model Customization: Tailors to specific business needs.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Enhanced Security: Proactive detection and prevention of fraud.
Improved Compliance: Supports adherence to regulatory standards.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines transaction processing.
Retained User Trust: Ensures consistent customer due diligence.

Financial institutions utilize Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management primarily for transaction monitoring and anti-money laundering tasks. These establishments, such as banks, employ its various modules to detect fraud, manage cases, and support their compliance efforts. It aids in monitoring suspicious activities, assessing risk, and ensuring customer interactions are secure and reliable, providing visibility across multiple global branches.

NICE

SHIELD is a device-first, risk AI platform that helps digital businesses worldwide eliminate fake accounts and stop all fraudulent activity.

SHIELD identifies the root of fraud with the global standard for device identification (SHIELD Device ID) and actionable risk intelligence, empowering businesses to stay ahead of new and unknown fraud threats.

We are trusted by global unicorns like inDrive, Alibaba, Swiggy, Meesho, TrueMoney, and more. With offices in San Francisco, Miami, London, Berlin, Jakarta, Bengaluru, Beijing, and Singapore, we are rapidly achieving our mission - eliminating unfairness to enable trust for the world.

For more information, visit shield.com

SHIELD

Sample Customers

Associated Banc-Corp

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Fraud Detection and Prevention

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

853,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.