We performed a comparison between NetFoundry and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zscaler, Palo Alto Networks, Cisco and others in ZTNA as a Service."The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is in the cloud."
"The Network as a Service that they offer is most valuable."
"The initial setup of Okta Workforce Identity is straightforward. I was able to get an environment ready within half a day."
"We find the solution to be reliable for our customers and it is nice that it is cloud-based and can be accessed from anywhere."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"It made things a lot easier, especially with passwords."
"The MFA part is the best. MFA provided most of the security that we were looking at with respect to the second level of authentication. Okta Workforce Identity provides a number of options with respect to multifactor authentication, such as the app, phone call, and text. These options provide different ways of logging in for users, and they were a lot more than what we needed. This is certainly a very good feature of Okta Workforce Identity."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"We face no challenges in integrating the product with our legacy systems."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."
"If they have a firewall capability, that would be good. Currently, because they don't have a firewall, we are required to put another layer of control on top of their solution. A built-in firewall would be quite good."
"The solution could provide internet access control."
"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."
"Okta Workforce Identity can improve by having more features in governance."
"The ability or the options in the solution for changing the look and feel are not good enough because in our partner portal, essentially what they have is an ugly admin interface."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"In my country, there's a lot of stealing of mobile phones, and mobile phones are the authentication device through the Okta application. If someone should steal my mobile phone, which is very common in my country, he or she might have access to my company account. That's my concern."
"Support could be a bit faster."
"The solution should have greater on-premises availability, not just cloud and more package customization in its processing."
"It can have more API integrations."
NetFoundry is ranked 21st in ZTNA as a Service with 2 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 7th in ZTNA as a Service with 56 reviews. NetFoundry is rated 9.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of NetFoundry writes "Easy to set up, stable, and helpful for integrating the systems that require a fast and reliable connection". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". NetFoundry is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0.
See our list of best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.