NetApp SnapMirror vs QoreStor comparison

NetApp and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Replication category. NetApp is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.1, while Quest Software is ranked #12 with an average rating of 7.0. NetApp holds a 15.0% mindshare in DR, compared to Quest Software’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

NetApp SnapMirror

Read 26 NetApp SnapMirror reviews

1,911 Views
1,873 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QoreStor

Read 9 QoreStor reviews

791 Views
63 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp SnapMirror

QoreStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 19, 2025

NetApp SnapMirror and QoreStor compete in data replication and storage efficiency. SnapMirror stands out in disaster recovery and rapid data transfer, while QoreStor shines in extreme deduplication and compression, offering significant storage savings.

Features: SnapMirror offers powerful data replication, snapshot technology, and integrity maintenance across transfers. It integrates well into VMware environments and supports a wide range of applications for comprehensive disaster recovery. QoreStor provides significant data reduction through advanced deduplication and compression. It is flexible, running on various hardware and integrating smoothly with multiple backup solutions, enabling efficient data archiving and tiering to the cloud.

Room for Improvement: SnapMirror users highlight challenges with disk utilization during deswizzling, synchronization of large volumes, and licensing complexity. Improvements are needed in network transfer efficiency and support for various replication scenarios. QoreStor needs enhancements in installation ease, support automation, and ransomware protection. Better monitoring and reporting capabilities are also desired to improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SnapMirror supports on-premises and hybrid deployments, receiving positive feedback on its technical support, though initial setup processes could improve. QoreStor supports diverse environments, including on-premises and private cloud. Its technical support is praised for responsiveness, but speeding up resolution times and installation processes is a common suggestion.

Pricing and ROI: SnapMirror's costs can be high, especially with added licensing fees, making budgeting crucial. However, bundled purchases offer value, and it is seen as affordable compared to some competitors. QoreStor has competitive pricing with a flexible licensing model based on storage usage, facilitating scalable growth. It is cost-effective, providing significant value in data protection and availability, delivering robust ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp SnapMirror vs. QoreStor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror vs. QoreStor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp SnapMirror

Ranking in Data Replication

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QoreStor

Ranking in Data Replication

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (51st), Disk Based Backup Systems (7th), Storage Software (5th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (29th), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (23rd), Copy Data Management (6th), File and Object Storage (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Replication category, the mindshare of NetApp SnapMirror is 15.0%, down from 21.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QoreStor is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Replication

Featured Reviews

Abdul-Salam

Sr. Manager - System Analyst (Datacenter Infrastructure) at Sohar International

Provides great data loss recovery and real time replication

Deployment was very smooth and took around two weeks. Following that, we carried out our data migration which took time. We previously used a Windows file independent server with its own local disk and Windows OS. It's not compatible with NetApp so data had to be physically migrated. We also took extra time integrating with our antivirus software and configuring external tape libraries with NetApp. We had one staff member involved in the deployment and an engineer from our partners. We have close to 900 users. The solution requires routine tasks as opposed to maintenance. We have three or four people with access to this storage.

Read full review

Jeff Manuszak

CTO at EDSI

Cost-efficient, highly scalable, and installable on different types of hardware

They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved. We are pretty lenient as we do a lot of IT support ourselves. We are not very hard on support organizations, but when a customer has a support issue, it would be easier if the support processes were a little bit more automated. It would be beneficial to have an easier way to upload diagnostic dump files. They can make it easy for the customer to collect the diagnostic data. There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field. This is especially critical because it stores customers' backups, and a failure can have significant business impacts. If a customer does not have the backups and has a disaster, they can be out of business, so monitoring is key.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The synchronous and real-time replication are the most vital features of NetApp SnapMirror"

"The technical support is quite good."

"NetApp SnapMirror stands out for its ease of management, efficiency, and scalability, which align well with our operational needs."

"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."

"The tool seamlessly moves data over the network without putting pressure on the network."

"The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements."

"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."

More NetApp SnapMirror pros

"Data deduplication and replication would be the top two features. The encryption and cloud tiering are also attractive for the future."

"The dedupe and compression are pretty extreme. On disk, we're getting dedupe rates of up to 65 percent of data and compression of 34 percent. When you go to the cloud, it's more like 76 percent for dedupe and almost 50 percent for compression."

"Quest QoreStor definitely saved us money."

"QoreStor has helped us to reduce our backup storage requirements on-premises. We've been using the same devices for quite a while, and so it lets us keep using them as opposed to having to rip out all that hardware and create a new on-prem solution. The advantage here is even if we had to retire the hardware tomorrow, the QoreStor part doesn't change. We just have to have additional hardware and put the solution back on whatever hardware we pick and it'll do the same thing."

"The extreme compression of data is a big thing for us. We were looking for an online backup solution, and QoreStor is very good in terms of data compression. It helps us minimize the required storage in the Blob Storage environment."

"We need revisions and safe backup so that it could be held up in court, but deduplication and compression are the main features why we have Quest QoreStor. That's where it really shines. I use ZFS and XFS at home, and Quest QoreStor is even better."

"Deduplication is the most valuable feature. It saves us a lot of space. When we back up 100 terabytes of data, after dedupe, it only uses maybe five to six terabytes for the disk space in QoreStor."

"It integrates with various backup software solutions, which makes it compatible with existing backup workflows and processes."

More QoreStor pros

Cons

"The tool should also work on third-party solutions."

"Synchronous replication with read-write on both sides in both data centers is powerful but risky since it is greatly affected by high network latency."

"It's necessary to install NetApp simulator to avoid complications."

"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."

"We have to do manual verifications about the subscriptions often."

"Compression and deduplication could be improved."

"The new coursework models need to be improved. The bandwidth monitoring could also be better."

"The price could be cheaper."

More NetApp SnapMirror cons

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial."

"Overall, I am happy with this solution, but a way to export configuration settings would be beneficial. After everything is set up and configured, there should be a way to export the configuration. In case something happens to the QoreStor server, and we need to reinstall and configure everything, being able to import the configuration would be helpful. This feature does not currently exist."

"The setup of the software is definitely not the easiest thing. I worked a lot with Quest engineers, especially in the early days when we were first testing it and trying it out. I actually had some of the developers working with us at one point because they were going through these point releases, and I was having trouble getting it to work in this S3-compatible situation. We got it all working eventually, but setup is definitely not the easiest thing in the world."

"They could improve on support a little bit. We have not had to engage their support much, but when we do have issues, it can take longer to get things resolved."

"There can be some kind of monitoring solutions to alert users to issues with the appliance or software, making it easy for customers to monitor their systems in the field."

"Support is one point of improvement for Quest QoreStor. Support is sometimes not adequate."

"The importance of support is significant to me. I was working for a service provider, and all of our customers had a Quest or warning. Sometimes the support really underperforms."

"They need to increase their maximum capacity. Other than that, they're doing a pretty good job."

More QoreStor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's a highly cost-effective solution"

"The solution has monthly and yearly licensing options."

"The pricing could be improved."

"The product price is reasonable."

"SnapMirror is extremely expensive. We had a hard time adjusting to our budget. If rated on a scale of one to ten, with ten being the most expensive, I would definitely rate it ten out of ten."

"It's part of the NetApp Firewall, so it's free."

"The cost is low compared to different vendors."

"The pricing can be improved."

"The pricing is good. It is competitive for a managed services provider. I like the ability to pay by the terabyte, allowing for an incremental cost that we and our customers can afford, so the solution grows with the customer."

"Its pricing model is very attractive. You have one price, and you get everything from QoreStor."

"Quest QoreStor's pricing is affordable. We evaluated Veeam, a well-known company for backup solutions, but found their pricing to be quite high. Veeam's price was almost double. For us, Quest QoreStor is very affordable."

"The cost is per terabyte, and overall, the cost was reasonable when compared to some competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Replication solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about NetApp SnapMirror?

The performance and stability are valuable features. It seems to fulfill all the requirements.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapMirror?

The product price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp SnapMirror?

They could make continued enhancements in integration with diverse platforms for the product.

See all answers

What else besides data replication does QoreStor offer?

Quest QoreStor can be used for multiple things besides data replication. For example, it can be trusted to make a backup of your data. You know that replication and backups are different, right? Re...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore protect your data?

One of our favorite features of Quest QoreStore for data protection isn't the backup, actually, though we're using it actively (maybe just as much as data replication, to be honest). We absolutely ...

See all answers

How does Quest QoreStore solve repetitive data replicas?

When I first found out about data replication and the many benefits it had, I couldn't help but wonder - what about the copies you don't need? Like it's unavoidable for some of the copies to get da...

See all answers

Comparisons

NetApp Snapshot vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 73% of the time

Hitachi TrueCopy vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 9% of the time

Dell AppSync vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 7% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 6% of the time

Hitachi Universal Replicator vs NetApp SnapMirror

Compared 5% of the time

More NetApp SnapMirror Competitors

Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) vs QoreStor

Compared 100% of the time

More QoreStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror

August 2025

Download NetApp SnapMirror product report

Buyer's Guide

QoreStor

August 2025

Download QoreStor product report

Also Known As

SnapMirror

QoreStor

Overview

NetApp SnapMirror technology provides fast, efficient data replication and disaster recovery (DR) for your critical data. Use a single solution across all NetApp storage arrays and protocols. SnapMirror technology works with any application, in both virtual and traditional environments, and in multiple configurations, including hybrid cloud.

NetApp

QoreStor optimizes storage costs through advanced deduplication and compression, seamlessly integrating with backup infrastructures and supporting diverse hardware. It enhances data security with replication and offers flexible deployment with minimal maintenance.

QoreStor offers significant benefits in deduplication, which leads to space savings and reduced storage expenses. This system integrates effortlessly with backup platforms like NetVault and Veeam, functioning as a reliable backup target for both on-premises and cloud environments. The ease of integration is complemented by its replication capabilities, which add a layer of data security by enabling geographically dispersed backups. Its cloud tiering functionality extends storage capabilities, ensuring cost-effectiveness compared to other solutions. While enhancements are needed in areas like Cloud Tier support, Air Gap features, and GUI intuitiveness, the continued developments aim to further optimize storage and backup solutions.

What are QoreStor's key features?

Deduplication and Compression: Achieves high deduplication rates and space savings.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse backup infrastructures.
Replication: Facilitates data security through multi-location backups.
Cloud Tiering: Extends storage capabilities efficiently.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires low maintenance efforts.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Cost-Effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing and optimized storage.
Storage Optimization: Reduces storage needs with advanced data handling.
Flexibility: Supports diverse hardware and deployment options.
Data Security: Enhances protection with robust replication features.

QoreStor is widely implemented in industries for backup and restore operations, providing data deduplication and compression as key functionalities. Its integration as a backup target across platforms like NetVault and Veeam makes it ideal for enterprises that require efficient data management and storage cost control. Many organizations utilize its features to optimize cloud storage seamlessly while focusing on internal data handling or acting as service resellers.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

University at Albany, City of Houston, Yahoo Japan, Washington Employment Security Department, DG Khan Cement Co. Ltd., AmTrust Financial Services, Sheridan College

American Airlines, at&t, Bank of America. Barclays, ebay, Ford

Buyer's Guide

NetApp SnapMirror vs. QoreStor

July 2025

Free Report: NetApp SnapMirror vs. QoreStor

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp SnapMirror vs. QoreStor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp SnapMirror vs. QoreStor report.

See our list of best Data Replication vendors.

We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.