Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetApp SnapCenter vs Rocket Servergraph comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NetApp SnapCenter
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
44th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rocket Servergraph
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
89th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of NetApp SnapCenter is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rocket Servergraph is 0.4%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
NetApp SnapCenter0.8%
Rocket Servergraph0.4%
Other98.8%
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

SaneeshC - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. engineer at Sify Technologies
Has reduced backup time for large workloads and supports smooth workload migration
Role-based access control and multi-factor authentication are security features available in NetApp SnapCenter. The one-time password comes to our multi-factor authentication tool; we work with Cisco Duo, and that OTP is generated through that tool, which we use to access the device. There are different options through which we can migrate workloads without downtime. The user interface is very easy to handle and not complicated. There are multiple features that make NetApp SnapCenter valuable. In case of any job failure, we get an alert over email. For jobs replicating from site A to site B, we know how long it will take to complete that replication. All that information is available in the console, and there aren't any difficulties or objections that need to be improved.
it_user728961 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Analyst at a newspaper with 1,001-5,000 employees
The product pays for itself in productivity gain
Customer Service: 10 out of 10. Technical Support: I have not found a company with a better support team in recent years. While other organizations' support have seemed to become less robust, ServerGraph has continues to excel in this area. This is the only organization that I can meet readily with developers, when warranted.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
880,255 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise12
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp SnapCenter?
The product team handles the commercial aspects of pricing.
What needs improvement with NetApp SnapCenter?
We have not started much with the automation capability in NetApp SnapCenter. Regarding the integration aspect, I am not certain about its complexity, as this was built by the OEM NetApp team.
What is your primary use case for NetApp SnapCenter?
The major use case for NetApp SnapCenter is that our customer previously used Commvault. For huge VMs with sizes of five TB or 10 TB, taking the file level backup in Commvault took a long time, oft...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

SnapCenter
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

All for One Steeb AG, Accenture
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Celerity Limited, Cristie Nordic, Fiserv
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp SnapCenter vs. Rocket Servergraph and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
880,255 professionals have used our research since 2012.