NEC Sigmablade-M vs Oracle Netra Modular System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NEC Sigmablade-M and Oracle Netra Modular System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
19th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
45
Comparisons
38
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
22nd
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
33
Comparisons
19
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Sigmablade-M
Learn More
Overview

The NEC SIGMABLADE-M is an 8-blade chassis that comprises 6U of rack space and offers a compact size that is ideal for mid-sized systems, easy monitoring of the status of each blade server, and better and easier cabling through the use of KVM switches.

Oracle’s Netra Modular System is a transformative platform for customers looking to build out their communications on-premises and cloud infrastructures. With extreme agility and scale in a platform that can be completely virtualized, customers benefit from accelerated development, rapid bring up, and low-cost maintenance. Netra Modular System takes today’s traditional bladed and rackmount architectures and merges them to create a new innovative best-of-breed next-generation platform. This integrated system is designed to handle compute, networking, and storage evolution without forklift upgrades. Netra Modular System provides the service and business agility required in today’s fast-paced market. 

Sample Customers
Sysmex Shanghai
Ovum
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NEC Sigmablade-M is ranked 19th in Blade Servers while Oracle Netra Modular System is ranked 22nd in Blade Servers. NEC Sigmablade-M is rated 0.0, while Oracle Netra Modular System is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Netra Modular System writes "It's not a one-size-fits-all converged infrastructure system, which means that I can mix things and have convergence throughout the whole stack". NEC Sigmablade-M is most compared with , whereas Oracle Netra Modular System is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.