Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NEC Sigmablade-M vs Oracle Netra Modular System comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NEC Sigmablade-M
Ranking in Blade Servers
22nd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Netra Modular System
Ranking in Blade Servers
21st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of NEC Sigmablade-M is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Netra Modular System is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers
 

Featured Reviews

Use NEC Sigmablade-M?
Share your opinion
it_user429384 - PeerSpot reviewer
It's not a one-size-fits-all converged infrastructure system, which means that I can mix things and have convergence throughout the whole stack.
The Netra Modular System is really cool because unlike all the other Oracle solutions, this is a system that is a lot more agile. It's a technology that's the basis of a converged infrastructure, but it's what we work on -- agile convergence. The Netra Modular system lets you do things you can't do with competing products. Competing technologies in convergence force you to use their hypervisor. They force you to use their OS. They force you to use their storage in its configuration. It's very cookie cutter. They're kind of one-size-fits-all and there's no flexibility. If you think it, when's the last time you bought your clothes one-size-fits-all? It just doesn't fit well. People have been doing that with convergence. So what's cool with the Netra Modular System is that it's not one-size-fits-all. I can mix things in it in ways I can't mix on other systems, but when I use Enterprise Manager, I still have the advantages of a converged system. I still have a single pane of glass, but it doesn't do a lot of convergence, just maybe the network, the storage, and the operating system. With Netra and Enterprise Manager, I can start from the network in storage and go all the way up into the application tier. It's convergence throughout the whole stack.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Sigmablade-M
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sysmex Shanghai
Ovum
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: May 2025.
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.