Nasuni vs StorSimple comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Nasuni and Microsoft are both solutions in the Cloud Storage Gateways category. Nasuni is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #6. Nasuni holds a 20.3% mindshare in CSG, compared to Microsoft’s 8.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nasuni users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Nasuni

Read 37 Nasuni reviews

10,633 Views
2,020 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

StorSimple

Read 3 StorSimple reviews

935 Views
776 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nasuni

StorSimple

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

StorSimple and Nasuni compete in the cloud storage and data management sector. Nasuni seems to have the upper hand in feature set and data management capabilities, while StorSimple offers potential advantages in pricing and support.

Features: StorSimple offers hybrid storage solutions, integrating on-premises and cloud environments for data tiering and management. It is advantageous for businesses prioritizing hybrid setups. Nasuni provides a cloud-native global file system for seamless distributed data access. Its features better address scalability and global collaboration needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: StorSimple simplifies deployment for users familiar with Microsoft infrastructures, offering support through Microsoft channels. Nasuni offers straightforward deployment for cloud-based solutions with proactive customer service. Both products provide strong service, but Nasuni’s cloud-centric approach may enhance specific deployment and service experiences.

Pricing and ROI: StorSimple often presents lower initial setup costs, promising quick ROI for businesses with Microsoft investments. Nasuni's higher initial costs are balanced by extensive cloud capabilities, potentially leading to long-term savings on infrastructure and management. Organizations with immediate budget constraints might favor StorSimple, while those seeking longer-term value may prefer Nasuni.

To learn more, read our detailed Nasuni vs. StorSimple Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nasuni vs. StorSimple

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nasuni

Ranking in Cloud Storage Gateways

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File System Software (3rd), NAS (14th), Cloud Migration (8th), Cloud Storage (14th), Cloud Backup (30th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (20th)

StorSimple

Ranking in Cloud Storage Gateways

6th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud Storage Gateways category, the mindshare of Nasuni is 20.3%, down from 32.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of StorSimple is 8.4%, up from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Gateways Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nasuni	20.3%
StorSimple	8.4%
Other	71.3%

Cloud Storage Gateways

Featured Reviews

ShailenderSingh1

Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Unified cloud file storage has simplified global data management and reduced operational overhead

From an admin perspective, Nasuni has various valuable features. The GUI is very good, upgrading is very easy, and DFS is very easily manageable. Compared with other products, the snapshot feature is beneficial because it creates a snapshot every five minutes, allowing me to provide restores very easily to customers. Data protection is enhanced by the fact that Nasuni uses S3 technology to create snapshots every five minutes and enables versioning, so the snapshot is created and I can utilize that snapshot for disaster recovery or restore purposes. I assess the value of global file locking and caching for reducing latency as good.

Read full review

it_user687201

IT-Consultant Microsoft Solutions at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The deduplication technology saves time within a disaster recovery case.

The deduplication technology is the most valuable feature. It saves time within a disaster recovery case I hope that the virtual device in the cloud will get more functionality! I have used this solution for five years. The product is very stable. Due to the fact that it is combined with…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is disaster recovery. We can fully recover a site in two hours."

"Nasuni reduced our overall storage footprint at our sites by 70 to 80 percent."

"With Nasuni Management Console (NMC), we get a single, centralized view of our entire internal structure and data center structure. This is very important because this caters to remote locations. One of the main care center teams is dependent on this solution. As it is directly connected to customers for the calls that they receive and troubleshoot, they can then help customers out in case they are not able to place an order."

"Nasuni has replaced multiple data silos and toolsets with a single, global file system."

"Using this solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to recover data in the event of a disaster, lower our cost of operations, reduce our workload, and our savings through using Nasuni is approximately 35%."

"One of Nasuni's best characteristics is its fully redundant system; we don't have to shift tapes or use other backup solutions. It's a good, full-featured product."

"The Nasuni management dashboard is helpful because, on the administration side, I'm able to view all of the different filers that we have in the UK, rather than check each one of them individually."

"I would recommend Nasuni because it's a proven product that has delivered results for us even in the worst-case scenario. If you're still using a traditional cloud solution like native Azure products, you are still susceptible to human error. Also, you would need to architect your backup and DR solutions, then integrate, maintain, and administer them."

More Nasuni pros

"This product is easy to use and does all the work in the background for cloud replication and migration."

"This device has made it possible for us to almost entirely do away with Tape backup."

"The deduplication technology is the most valuable feature."

Cons

"I would like to see Nasuni create a Dropbox or Box alternative. One of the things that people like about those tools is that they are very easy to implement. They look just like a file server. With Nasuni, you have to be online to get your file storage. With Dropbox, there is a thing running on your PC that downloads the files to it when you need them, i.e., an agent."

"Its interface design or the graphic user interface design can be slightly tweaked in some areas. Some built-in setup wizards would be very beneficial. Rather than having to go in and configure it by hand, there should be more setup wizards for onboarding new data shares and getting it set up the way you want. I don't know if these are on their roadmap, but I sat down and talked to them about some of the work concerns, some of the things that we liked, and some of the things that we didn't like. They are probably working on that."

"One thing to consider is that Nasuni will have the same limitations that a traditional file storage solution will have, although that is because they are taking the place of a traditional architectural model. For example, Office 365 supports collaboration on documents such as Excel files and Word documents, but because Nasuni is a traditional file server, in that sense, it can't make use of that functionality."

"The customer portal could be improved, but it has been a while since I've used it. They might already have improved it."

"The Nasuni file storage platform doesn't work well when there are a high number of small files. This is the case when a directory structure contains more than 10,000 or 20,000 small files, e.g., 5 KB, 10 KB, or 15 KB. When the user is accessing these files from another geographical location, they might face a slow response or timeouts when connecting to the shares, and then to the files. This is because the file size is small. There is a scope of improvement with this solution when it comes to accessing a large number of small files."

"There have been small shortcomings with support so it isn't perfect, although I don't think that any supplier I have dealt with has support that I would rate a ten out of ten."

"The performance monitoring could be improved."

"When we have to rebuild a filer or put a new one at a site, one of the things that I would like to be able to do is just repoint the data from Azure to it. As it is now, you need to copy it using a method like Robocopy."

More Nasuni cons

"I would like more options besides iSCSI."

"I hope that the virtual device in the cloud will get more functionality!"

"Had a SSD drive go bad in one of our older units. This was replaced under our service plan, but during the rebuild process encountered a bad block in another SSD that it was reading from and downed the device hard."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's cheaper than a lot of alternatives but it's not cheap."

"It is around $850 per terabyte per year. Any additional costs that you would incur are for the local caching devices that you'll need to access Nasuni. You kind of provide your own virtual machines or compute to access the data. You also pay for the object storage. So, there are three parts to it. There is the Nasuni license per terabyte. You would also pay for the actual object storage in the cloud, and then you would pay for virtual machines to access the storage."

"Its price is fair and reasonable. I don't have anything negative about its pricing and licensing. For us, there is also the cost of monitoring. We are monitoring through Xenos and not through Nasuni. That is another cost for us from the monitoring perspective, but as far as Nasuni goes, we don't have any other cost apart from the licensing fee."

"Its pricing can get a tad expensive. When we first took Nasuni out, we were just paying for the service. We got storage at a reduced rate. It has now changed, and they're now more of an all-in-one type of thing. It can be quite expensive, but it works out. Apart from that, licensing-wise, it's very simple."

"There are annual costs that we pay for maintaining all of the snapshot history in the cloud. That is the primary cost that we pay. We occasionally buy newer Nasuni appliances or deploy them to new offices when the need occurs. That capital equipment expenses is less than the cost of buying new file storage systems. For the most part, you are trading a CapEx cost of storage equipment for an OpEx cost for management of all the snapshot data in the cloud."

"It has a license fee as well as hardware costs, which we would incur if we want to use Nasuni Cloud Storage Gateway for upgrades."

"Nasuni pricing is average; it's not too high or too low."

"There are cheaper forms of storage, but Nasuni is fairly priced for the functionality it offers. I can get basic file shares provisioned in Azure and pay for the storage and the CPU. The overall cost would be much less than Nasuni, but I would need to build the management console and encryption process, so it would cost a lot to develop that kind of functionality."

More Nasuni pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage Gateways solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	26

No data available

Questions from the Community

Does Nasuni have a good pricing model?

Based on the experience of my organization, Nasuni is definitely worth the money, since it gives you an all-in-one solution where you'd usually need several programs. About the cost, there isn't a ...

See all answers

Is it easy to restore files with Nasuni?

As someone who has used this feature of Nasuni I can tell you - yes, it's good for file recovery and you'll definitely benefit from very quick times. I can't tell you if it's the best one because I...

See all answers

What features and services does Nasuni offer?

Hi, if you pick Nasuni, you'll be benefiting from many services for a good price. Well, it's a personalized price you get after an agreement with the company but in my organization's case, it is a ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

CTERA Intelligent Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 8% of the time

Panzura CloudFS vs Nasuni

Compared 5% of the time

Egnyte vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

Datomia vs Nasuni

Compared 3% of the time

More Nasuni Competitors

Panzura CloudFS vs StorSimple

Compared 25% of the time

AWS Storage Gateway vs StorSimple

Compared 18% of the time

NetApp AltaVault vs StorSimple

Compared 17% of the time

CTERA Intelligent Data Platform vs StorSimple

Compared 14% of the time

Dell CloudBoost vs StorSimple

Compared 6% of the time

More StorSimple Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nasuni

October 2026

Download Nasuni product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Storage Gateways

November 2026

Download StorSimple product report

Overview

Nasuni provides a robust platform for seamless global file storage, offering unified file management, data protection, and cost-effective scalability.

Nasuni's approach integrates a unified file system with high-level security features, ensuring seamless data access and synchronization. Despite its strong capabilities in data replication and storage, Nasuni faces challenges in integration and small file performance. Users appreciate its scalability and cost reduction but call for enhancements in cloud mirroring, automated load balancing, and multi-factor authentication. Better content visibility, mobile access tools, and refined monitoring are desired to enhance user experience. Organizations utilize Nasuni for global file sharing, disaster recovery, and collaborative data management across distributed teams, effectively replacing older systems.

What are Nasuni's Key Features?

Seamless Data Transmission: Enables efficient data flow across locations.
Unified File System: Centralizes file management for ease of access.
Unlimited Storage Capacity: Offers scalable options with global access.
Data Protection: Continuous versioning and ransomware protection.
Single Management Console: Streamlines administrative tasks.

What Benefits Can Users Expect from Nasuni?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces infrastructure expenses by leveraging scalable architecture.
Data Accessibility: Enhances sync and access across multiple sites.
Improved Collaboration: Supports teamwork across dispersed teams.
Confidence in Data Security: Comprehensive encryption and private key management.

Nasuni is adeptly used in industries requiring robust data management such as finance, healthcare, and media, where file synchronization and disaster recovery are critical. Enterprises deploy it to replace outdated file-sharing systems, enhancing workflow efficiency and data reliability.

Nasuni

StorSimple is an integrated storage management solution designed to meet cloud-integrated storage needs effectively, providing automation and scalability for businesses seeking efficient data management.

StorSimple offers seamless data storage by combining on-premises and cloud-based storage systems. This hybrid approach ensures data is efficiently managed, secure, and easily accessible. It reduces the burden on IT resources with its centralized management, enabling easy cloud transition and integration into existing systems. Designed for dynamic workloads, StorSimple provides valuable cost savings by automating data tiering between local environments and cloud storage, ensuring optimal performance and storage efficiency.

What are the most important features of StorSimple?

Automated Data Tiering: Ensures efficient use of storage resources by automatically moving data to the most appropriate storage tier.
Centralized Management: Simplifies storage administration by providing a single interface for managing multiple storage resources.
Data Security: Enhances protection through advanced encryption and secure access protocols.
Scalability: Adapts quickly to growing data storage requirements, leveraging the cloud's scalability.
Disaster Recovery: Facilitates efficient backup and recovery processes to ensure business continuity.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces storage costs through effective tiering and cloud integration.
Time Savings: Minimizes manual storage management tasks, allowing IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
Enhanced Reliability: Increases data reliability through robust backup and recovery options.
Improved Accessibility: Facilitates quick data access and retrieval, supporting better business operations.

Industries like healthcare and finance implement StorSimple for its ability to handle large volumes of sensitive data efficiently. Healthcare providers benefit from secure patient data management, while financial institutions leverage its reliable backup and disaster recovery features to ensure uninterrupted services.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

American Standard, CBRE, Cushman & Wakefield, E*TRADE, Ithaca Energy, McLaren Construction, Morton Salt, Movado, Urban Outfitters, Western Digital

AGC AusGroup. Black & Veatch, Catholic School Board, Convergent Computing, GF Health Products, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Mazda, Medplast, Mulvanny G2 Architecture, Paul Smith, Provoke Solutions Ltd, Saudi ReadyMix, SK Telecom, TechSmith, Textron, Walbridge

Buyer's Guide

Nasuni vs. StorSimple

September 2026

Free Report: Nasuni vs. StorSimple

Find out what your peers are saying about Nasuni vs. StorSimple and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nasuni vs. StorSimple report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage Gateways vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.