N-able EDR vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

N-able and Trellix are both solutions in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category. N-able is ranked #53 with an average rating of 7.0, while Trellix is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.5. N-able holds a 0.4% mindshare in EDR, compared to Trellix’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N-able users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Trellix users who would recommend it.

N-able EDR

Read 3 N-able EDR reviews

716 Views
552 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Read 54 Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) reviews

3,273 Views
2,549 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

N-able EDR

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024

Trellix Endpoint Security ENS and N-able EDR are both high-quality endpoint security solutions. Based on user reviews, N-able EDR stands out for its streamlined experience and robust automation features, giving it a slight edge.

Features: Trellix ENS offers comprehensive threat detection, strong integration with other Trellix products, and a powerful response feature set. N-able EDR is known for advanced automation capabilities, a more streamlined user experience, and effective security management tasks.

Room for Improvement: Trellix ENS could benefit from a more intuitive management console, quicker update processes, and enhanced reporting capabilities. N-able EDR could improve its reporting functionality, provide more detailed logs, and offer better customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Trellix ENS deployment is generally straightforward, with responsive customer service, though some users need in-depth training. N-able EDR is noted for quick setup and excellent customer support, which simplifies the onboarding process for new users.

Pricing and ROI: Trellix ENS pricing is often seen as justified by its rich feature set, positioning it as a higher-end investment. N-able EDR users find it cost-effective with strong ROI, making it attractive for budget-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N-able EDR

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

53rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trellix Endpoint Security (...

Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) category, the mindshare of N-able EDR is 0.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.1%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

Featured Reviews

Yazan Albaw

Customer Success Director at We Cybers

N-able EDR SentinelOne delivers advanced endpoint protection through real-time threat detection, automated response, and comprehensive visibility to safeguard against cyber threats.

N-able EDR SentinelOne is renowned for its exceptional detection and protection capabilities, ranked number one by Gartner and MITRE ATT&CK. It offers robust defense against various threats, including malware, fileless attacks, phishing, and insider threats. The solution excels in identifying suspicious behavior and promptly notifying engineers of potential threats. A key feature is its auto-response capability. You can configure automatic responses to threats, which significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage incidents. Enhanced by machine learning, these automated responses are both efficient and adaptive. Additionally, N-able EDR integrates seamlessly with RMM (Remote Monitoring and Management), allowing us to monitor EDR performance, detect failures, and oversee network performance from a single, unified dashboard. This integration streamlines management and enhances overall efficiency.

Read full review

Shreyansh Sharma

Instrument and Control Engineer at Reliance Industries Ltd

Our main antivirus tool and offers adaptive threat prevention tool

The technical support needs some improvement. When product distribution errors occur, we have to contact technical support, which is a very tedious and time consuming task. After raising the call onto the technical support portal, usually receive a notification after 24 hours. It usually takes 3 to 4 days to conclude and resolve the issue. If 24/7 online support or a phone line where we could speak directly with technical support for real-time troubleshooting, that would be very helpful. Licensing is another aspect where trellix should look into. Different purchases are grouped together in single user account get mixed up. Categorization of purchases and their grant numbers is not available to end user.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"It provides visibility and a storyline to track the virus or malware's activities, showing infected processes and changes made."

"The most valuable feature, which I can describe as the '360 vision' of the inventory device, provides a complete view of all the devices."

"The seamless deployment is very valuable."

"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."

"The activation of features within ENS and the collection of threats into a single console is a strong point."

"I recommend Trellix Endpoint Security to others as it seems like one of the industry standards and is fairly stable."

"The independent modules are very good."

"I have not received any complaints about the performance."

"The most valuable features of McAfee MVISION Endpoint are advanced threat protection, web filtering, and removable storage devices in the DLP."

"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pros

Cons

"I would like to see them add support for both Android and iOS smartphones."

"Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."

"I would rate the scalability as seven out of ten. The capability is useful. Concerning the license, if I add one more device without a license, it will automatically subscribe to a license. I do not appreciate that."

"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."

"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."

"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."

"We'd like better UI on the management screen."

"MVISION Endpoint is only compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 2016 and above. If I were using a Linux operating system, I would not be able to use MVISION Endpoint."

"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."

"The solution lacks device control."

"The initial setup can be a bit complicated for those unfamiliar with the product."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is average."

"It is based on an annual subscription."

"It was an annual fee. There was just one overall fee."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"Licensing fees are billed on a yearly basis."

"It is not so cheap in comparison to Sophos and other solutions."

"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."

"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."

"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with N-able EDR?

I do not have any ideas for improvement. It is a good solution, however, I am not an expert, so I do not have more ideas on this.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able EDR?

I use N-able EDR for monitoring the devices of my company.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able EDR?

The overall solution rating is seven out of ten. Scalability and integration could be improved, particularly with Microsoft tools.

See all answers

How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?

The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deploy various components as desired with McAfee Endpoint Security, whereas many othe...

See all answers

How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?

The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effective program. Its graphical design is such that it makes an extremely useful too...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?

The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs N-able EDR

Compared 41% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs N-able EDR

Compared 28% of the time

ESET Inspect vs N-able EDR

Compared 12% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs N-able EDR

Compared 11% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs N-able EDR

Compared 9% of the time

More N-able EDR Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 20% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 16% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Compared 7% of the time

More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)

January 2025

Download N-able EDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) product report

Also Known As

No data available

McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)

Overview

N-able EDR provides comprehensive endpoint detection and response capabilities, ensuring system security and facilitating rapid incident response. Users highlight its effectiveness in detecting threats and appreciate its detailed reporting and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure.

N-able EDR stands out with its robust threat detection, efficient endpoint protection, and comprehensive incident reporting. It offers constant monitoring and protection against malware and other cyber threats. Users find the configuration easy and appreciate the detailed alerts and analysis. With real-time monitoring and automated threat response, N-able EDR allows for high customization, contributing to enhanced security management. However, users suggest improvements in customization, reporting capabilities, scalability, and faster response times.

What are the standout features of N-able EDR?

Robust Threat Detection: Detects various cyber threats efficiently.
Simple System Configuration: Easy to set up and deploy.
Efficient Endpoint Protection: Provides continuous monitoring and protection.
Comprehensive Incident Reporting: Offers detailed reports and analysis.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly with existing IT infrastructure.
Real-time Monitoring: Monitors systems in real-time.
Automated Threat Response: Responds to threats automatically.
High Customization: Offers customization options to suit security needs.

What benefits or ROI should be considered?

Improved Security: Enhanced threat detection and rapid response ensure systems stay secure.
Time Savings: Automated responses and easy configuration save time for IT teams.
Detailed Insights: Comprehensive reports and alerts provide valuable security insights.
Operational Efficiency: Seamless integration with existing tools boosts operational efficiency.

N-able EDR is widely implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. In finance, it's crucial for protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance. Healthcare entities utilize it for safeguarding patient information against breaches. Retailers rely on its robust protection to secure transactional data from cyber threats.

N-able

Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from advanced cyber threats. With its advanced threat detection capabilities, ENS provides real-time visibility into endpoint activities, enabling proactive threat hunting and response.

It leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and block sophisticated malware, ransomware, and zero-day attacks. ENS also offers robust data loss prevention (DLP) features, preventing sensitive information from being leaked or stolen. With its centralized management console, ENS allows administrators to easily deploy, monitor, and manage security policies across all endpoints.

ENS provides seamless integration with existing security infrastructure, ensuring a layered defense approach. With Trellix ENS, organizations can enhance their security posture and safeguard their critical assets from evolving cyber threats.

Trellix

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation

Buyer's Guide

N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

April 2025

Free Report: N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)

Find out what your peers are saying about N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N-able EDR vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.