MuleSoft Composer vs SAS Data Integration Server comparison

Salesforce and SAS are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Salesforce is ranked #25 with an average rating of 7.8, while SAS is ranked #38 with an average rating of 7.0. Salesforce holds a 0.7% mindshare in DI, compared to SAS’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of SAS users who would recommend it.

MuleSoft Composer

Read 7 MuleSoft Composer reviews

1,461 Views
672 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAS Data Integration Server

Read 4 SAS Data Integration Server reviews

1,028 Views
781 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

MuleSoft Composer

SAS Data Integration Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SAS Data Integration Server and MuleSoft Composer compete in data management and integration. While SAS Data Integration Server has a strong reputation for pricing and support, MuleSoft Composer offers a robust feature set that justifies its investment for enterprises.

Features: SAS Data Integration Server provides ETL capabilities, scalability, and data governance, allowing efficient data processing across systems. MuleSoft Composer offers API integration tools, flexibility, and the ability to connect various enterprise applications, focusing on app interconnectivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAS Data Integration Server necessitates extensive setup and configuration, supported by its comprehensive support system. MuleSoft Composer allows quicker cloud-based deployment, simplifying service management with intuitive support options.

Pricing and ROI: SAS Data Integration Server involves a significant initial setup cost with potential long-term ROI as data needs expand. MuleSoft Composer’s subscription model presents lower upfront costs and faster ROI via improved productivity. Its flexible pricing model suits businesses preferring adaptable payment terms compared to SAS's traditional approach.

To learn more, read our detailed MuleSoft Composer vs. SAS Data Integration Server Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. SAS Data Integration Server

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MuleSoft Composer

Ranking in Data Integration

25th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (14th)

SAS Data Integration Server

Ranking in Data Integration

38th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of MuleSoft Composer is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Data Integration Server is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MuleSoft Composer	0.7%
SAS Data Integration Server	0.7%
Other	98.6%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2763903

BTP Architect at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

Has supported on-premise deployments well but could improve tool consolidation and flow development flexibility

I have analyzed but haven't used MuleSoft Composer extensively. I am not very proficient in the subject of pricing. Both platforms are performing well. If a customer is more SAP-centric, it makes sense to consider integration suite because of the predefined content. A customer will need to have SAP BTP for side-by-side application extensions. MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise. It is quite a popular platform. MuleSoft Composer might be less expensive than SAP integration suite, though this is an assumption as I haven't compared prices. I am accustomed to learning and studying with SAP documentation. The organization is more convenient for me, though there are plenty of documentation and resources for MuleSoft Composer as well. The context is the primary consideration. If a customer uses multiple SAP solutions, not just SAP for accounting, it makes sense to consider the integration suite due to better SAP compatibility. When SAP introduces new interface technology, integration suite will be the first to support it, while MuleSoft Composer will need time to develop new connectors. I rate this solution a six out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer2937544

Works at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Offloads processes on the server side but needs better installation syntax

One area for improvement is the installation process. Another point could be the syntax, as it sometimes involves using syntax names that are not intuitive. For example, to calculate the difference between two dates, the general syntax in SAS is called the data difference or data net function. However, another name is used, such as NF and INK. Without knowledge of SAS programming, it becomes unclear what these functions mean. It is not good to define function names this way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"MuleSoft Composer is powerful and flexible in terms of installation options, with runtime either on cloud or fully on-premise."

"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."

"The functionality of MuleSoft to connect with any database is the most important feature."

"The solution invokes some RPS from Composer and then sends emails and flat notifications. It helps us integrate with any third-party SAPE or integration tools."

"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."

"The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues."

"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."

"A key feature allows us to enhance job performance by offloading processing to the server side, rather than processing on the server itself."

"The solution offers very good data manipulation and loading."

"A key feature allows us to enhance job performance by offloading processing to the server side, rather than processing on the server itself."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its amazing capabilities in regard to data handling."

"The solution is very stable."

Cons

"The technical support team's response time must be improved."

"One additional feature they could add might be something like regional prices. Since we're based in Brazil, we pay in dollars but earn in Brazilian Real."

"I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible."

"There are some challenges with API sharing in Composer."

"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."

"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."

"There is also one limitation. We cannot see logs, latencies, or request counts."

"The transform tool has limited access. They should make it more flexible."

"The initial setup had issues, and even after using it for about one year, it was still not fixed."

"So I would like to see improved integration with other software."

"The initial setup of SAS Data Integration Server was complex."

"The initial setup had issues, and even after using it for about one year, it was still not fixed."

"One area for improvement is the installation process."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's costly, especially for Indian clients."

"Salesforce is licensed by user and by products and so pricing depending on what your requirements are."

"The tool is a bit expensive."

"MuleSoft Composer is affordable, and I rate its pricing a five to six out of ten."

"It is an expensive program."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about MuleSoft Composer?

The way Composer organizes and manages integration processes is most beneficial. We can easily monitor what's running and what isn't and troubleshoot any data integration issues.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MuleSoft Composer?

See all answers

What needs improvement with MuleSoft Composer?

I used Anypoint Studio, which is good though not very flexible. It seems strange that some functionality from MuleSoft Composer is available from Eclipse and some from Visual Code. It would be bett...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAS Data Integration Server?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAS Data Integration Server?

I am involved in the ETR job. My role is focused on executing the ETR job.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering SAS Data Integration Server?

I use it without further details. For example, if I use SAS to connect to a NetEazt database or purchase a shared asset to ODBC, I can connect to any database with ODBC connection support. The over...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 13% of the time

Workato vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 11% of the time

Celigo Integration Platform vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 8% of the time

PortX vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs MuleSoft Composer

Compared 6% of the time

More MuleSoft Composer Competitors

SSIS vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 20% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 8% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs SAS Data Integration Server

Compared 8% of the time

More SAS Data Integration Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download SAS Data Integration Server product report

Also Known As

MuleSoft Composer for Salesforce

SAS Enterprise Data Integration Server, Enterprise Data Integration Server

Overview

Connect apps and data to Salesforce quickly and easily with clicks, not code — all inside of the Salesforce UI.

Enrich your 360-degree customer view by empowering your Salesforce admins with a no-code solution for quickly unlocking data, connecting apps, and automating integrations to boost productivity.

- Build integrations easily with clicks, not code — all inside Salesforce
- Hit the ground running with a growing library of prebuilt connectors
- Preview as you build connections and design with real data
- Monitor any errors with automatic alerts

Salesforce

SAS Data Integration Server is a powerful, configurable and comprehensive solution that can meet a wide variety of data integration requirements, from small tactical projects to strategic business initiatives. It can access virtually all data sources, support data warehousing, migration, synchronization, federation and provisioning initiatives. It can support both batch-oriented and real-time master data management solutions. It can create reusable data integration services in support of service-oriented architectures and data governance and extract, cleanse, transform, conform, aggregate, load and manage data.

SAS

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Credit Guarantee Corporation, Cr_dito y Cauci‹n, Delaware State Police, Deutsche Lufthansa, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, DSM, Livzon Pharmaceutical Group, Los Angeles County, Miami Herald Media Company, Netherlands Enterprise Agency, New Zealand Ministry of Health, Nippon Paper, West Midlands Police, XS Inc., Zenith Insurance

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Composer vs. SAS Data Integration Server

January 2026

Free Report: MuleSoft Composer vs. SAS Data Integration Server

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft Composer vs. SAS Data Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MuleSoft Composer vs. SAS Data Integration Server report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.