Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mule ESB vs SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Mule ESB
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (2nd)
SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI)
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
EDI (4th), Supply Chain Management Software (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Mule ESB and SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Mule ESB is designed for Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) and holds a mindshare of 19.3%, down 22.4% compared to last year.
SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), on the other hand, focuses on EDI, holds 13.3% mindshare, up 10.9% since last year.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
EDI
 

Featured Reviews

Maharsh-Kapadia - PeerSpot reviewer
Transforms enterprise integration with comprehensive platform and excellent support
The best features of this solution are that everything we get into a single platform, whether it's integration, API, or data modeling; everything is available in one platform. It's a hybrid, including cloud and on-premise solutions with good connectivity and good connectors. From the benefits of using Mule ESB, we could reduce the manual tasks to 50% in one to two years. The cost is still something we are trying to make lower because we see some advantages when we move from point-to-point integration to API-led connectivity. We have seen a lot of reusable assets, so the cost is reduced. Ultimately, we want to see how it's transformed into business revenue; that's what we are still looking into.
it_user1546587 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, good support, integrates with ShipStation, and has helped reduce our workload
The ability to integrate with ShipStation has been a highlight. It also integrated directly with our ERP/CRM software seamlessly. SPS is intuitive to use and the interface is easy to navigate. We have multiple team members accessing multiple channel accounts within SPS and it could not be more user-friendly. The filters are a great way to get to the data you need.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Retailer
10%
Wholesaler/Distributor
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
What do you like most about Mule ESB?
The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Fulfillment (EDI), Trading Partner Integration Center
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Pet Supplies Plus, Royce Leather, J.R. Watkins Co., Zumba, Deva Concepts, River of Goods, Brooks Sports Inc., Crocs Inc., Redcat Racing, THOS. BAKER, Rugs Direct, WMH Tool Group
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Salesforce, Oracle and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: July 2025.
862,543 professionals have used our research since 2012.