MSP360 Backup vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery comparison

"It has allowed me to implement a cost effective, highly configurable solution."

"Provides connectivity to a lot of different cloud storage solutions."

"Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is its online backup capacity because you don't have to do an entire backup again and again, it just does whatever you type in, you type a, it goes a, you type b, it goes b. It doesn't take an entire site up again and again. So that incremental and bit by bit backup is important, it is a nice feature here."

"The initial setup is very easy. It's not overly complex."

"The most valuable feature for me is that I can see what has has been successfully backed up and what not. I do not mean the file or folder view, because that's problematic with GDPR, but I mean which machines have successfully backed up. It's very valuable because you don't have to check the machines. The second feature is that you can change backup settings in the portal."

"MSP360 Backup's most valuable feature is its backup interface."

"The most valuable feature of MSP360 Backup is its reliability."

"The initial setup of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is straightforward and easy."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the local storage solution, which significantly boosts performance, especially when transitioning from traditional architecture."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the reliability and scalability of being able to swing our workloads across the country."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."

"The product is very simple and very easy to use."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery can be used for snapshots, backup, and disaster recovery."

"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."

"The product could be more user-friendly."

"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

"Using the solution incurs additional charges for the device storage and backup which are not included in the service."

"The solution's pricing is very high."

"The restore time could improve. When we had an issue the restore time was lengthy."

"We could basically use just a more concise visual dashboard reporting on the status of the various machines."

"The major issue with Nutanix is its appliance-based model, which can lead to vendor lock-in."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."

"The dashboard could be a bit refreshed, and some configuration parts could be less confusing."

"The product must allow users to create a production domain on the main site in one hypervisor and a backup site on another."

"The solution should include a standard license for the object level and file level."

"The solution's bandwidth utilization can be improved further."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"Its pricing needs improvement."

"It includes a standard licensing fee. Once a year, there is a rebranding fee. The licensing costs are available on the internet for MSP360 Backup. There is a discount structure where if you have over 50 devices, you get a 50% discount. So, my cost is $2 a license per month."

"I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"The cost is pretty inexpensive. Around four to five dollars per device, per workstation on each server."

"The solution’s pricing is good."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery is a cheap solution."