MSP360 Backup vs Nutanix Disaster Recovery comparison

"The best feature is that it's very user-friendly to do scheduled backups and version maintenance."

"The most valuable feature for me is that I can see what has has been successfully backed up and what not. I do not mean the file or folder view, because that's problematic with GDPR, but I mean which machines have successfully backed up. It's very valuable because you don't have to check the machines. The second feature is that you can change backup settings in the portal."

"The UI is pretty good. It's very simple. That is one thing that we like about this. It's very user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of MSP360 Backup is its reliability."

"The solution is simple to use and easy to configure."

"I was mainly concerned with cloud backups, OneDrive backups, consumer OneDrive, business OneDrive, Google backups, and SharePoint backups. The solution did a good job of the backup."

"Client-side encryption minimizes worries about data being captured on the back-end."

"Technical support is very good."

"The initial setup of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is straightforward and easy."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the reliability and scalability of being able to swing our workloads across the country."

"For the last five years, we have had zero downtime."

"The product is very simple and very easy to use."

"The main benefits I've seen from using Nutanix Disaster Recovery include its single platform, which is significantly better than VMware, offering improved security, scalability, and multiple communication options."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery can be used for snapshots, backup, and disaster recovery."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the local storage solution, which significantly boosts performance, especially when transitioning from traditional architecture."

"Maybe implement an easier interface for basic users. For example, a set-up wizard with all the commonly used features as default."

"The graphics are looking a bit old and should be updated."

"They can add some production backup capabilities and the ability to do single instance back up. At the moment, it doesn't do deduplication on the standard backup. So, the issue is backing up PSG files for customers who have limited bandwidth. The other issue is that I don't like the implementation of the SQL backup. We do use SQL ourselves using a PowerShell script with the VDA tools as a module. That's how we back up. The rotation feature would be nice to have, but I know that they've got it on their dashboard or on their list to look at. They can also do a few tweaks to the dashboard. I would like the reporting capabilities on the portal to be much more granular. Normally, I export it to a text file, and then I run it through a pivot table in order to look at it from a cost-recovery point of view and to see when the backup last ran and if it was successful when it ran two or three days ago. Such a feature would work really well for my market. They can also add a cost-effective backup for Android and Apple cellphones. I've had one or two customers who were looking for this feature. I haven't found this functionality at the moment. I've been looking for a product that does that."

"As for what can be improved, some reports could be simplified so that you know how much backup you have done and what your backup details are. That report is available but it is very tough to get. I would like to know "today I have just uploaded 35 MB, tomorrow I have loaded 10 MB so my trend of backup is increasing.""

"The solution's pricing is very high."

"The Linux GUI leaves a lot to be desired. It lacks many of the features of the Windows version and is buggy, but it is still usable."

"The product could be more user-friendly."

"The solution needs a better graphical user interface. It's a graphical user interface that is very old-school right now. They could give it a little more modern feel."

"The major issue with Nutanix is its appliance-based model, which can lead to vendor lock-in."

"The solution should include a standard license for the object level and file level."

"Nowadays we find that Nutanix support is degraded. They started reducing their support."

"The solution's bandwidth utilization can be improved further."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."

"The dashboard could be a bit refreshed, and some configuration parts could be less confusing."

"The product must allow users to create a production domain on the main site in one hypervisor and a backup site on another."

"It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup."

"Its pricing needs improvement."

"It includes a standard licensing fee. Once a year, there is a rebranding fee. The licensing costs are available on the internet for MSP360 Backup. There is a discount structure where if you have over 50 devices, you get a 50% discount. So, my cost is $2 a license per month."

"We have a very good return on investment."

"MSP360 is vastly cheaper than its competitors and has almost all the same features."

"I rate the price of MSP360 Backup a seven out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"Pricing is reasonable although can be quite a large upfront cost."

"Nutanix Disaster Recovery is a cheap solution."

"The solution’s pricing is good."