MySQL and MongoDB compete in the database management systems category. MySQL has an upper hand in integration with popular tech stacks and established community support, while MongoDB offers remarkable flexibility and scalability.
Features: MySQL offers advantages such as robust SQL compatibility, open-source extensibility, and strong performance in small to medium applications. Its integration with LAMP/WAMP tech stacks enhances its applicability in web applications. MongoDB excels in storing unstructured data, JSON-based storage, and high flexibility, making it ideal for applications needing rapid development and scalability.
Room for Improvement: MySQL faces InnoDB complexity, lacking advanced features, and integration issues with certain modern requirements. MongoDB requires improvements in transaction support, enterprise-level features, and enhanced security and integration for more robust operations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers versatile deployment options across on-premises and cloud, but often relies on community support, which might limit non-commercial users. Conversely, MongoDB performs well in cloud environments, especially public clouds, providing structured cloud-centric support options.
Pricing and ROI: MySQL is open-source, offering cost-effective deployments and optional enterprise support, which makes it affordable for a variety of projects. MongoDB also provides a free community version but incurs higher costs with enterprise services, especially in large-scale projects. Both solutions significantly impact operational efficiency and ROI, with costs typically linked to commercial support and deployment scale.
Actually, with MongoDB, it's difficult to calculate the return on investment; it's too expensive for our use.
We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.
In CosmoDB, the scalability is much better than with the MongoDB ReplicaSet models.
Overall, on a scale of one to ten, I would rate MongoDB an eight; it's mostly because we're still running a monolithic environment on old hardware, so there are some limitations with read-write access.
MongoDB is highly scalable.
Meeting scalability requirements through cloud computing is an expensive affair.
We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.
We have not contracted the security options in our contract because they're too expensive; thus, we implement just encrypted databases and not the security pack.
While solutions for other databases like SQL or PostgreSQL already exist, MongoDB requires additional integrations for developing AI solutions.
It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.
Oracle could improve on scalability.
We use the free version of MongoDB, so there are no licensing costs.
We have to pay approximately 2,000 euros per month for MongoDB.
MongoDB has advantages over Cosmos DB, perhaps in metrics, as you can create some dashboards with database metrics.
MongoDB has definitely helped us improve our network monitoring and reporting dashboard.
It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and add new data points.
With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.
It allows programming, writing stored procedures, creating views, constraints, and triggers easily.
MongoDB is a flexible and scalable NoSQL database solution that efficiently handles both structured and unstructured data. It is known for its ease of use, JSON capabilities, and efficient data handling, making it ideal for developer-friendly environments.
MongoDB stands out with features like sharding, geospatial indexing, and its open-source nature. Users find it fast and appreciate its seamless integration into different applications. Despite being powerful, it remains straightforward to set up and use, bolstered by a clustering and aggregation framework that enhances its functionality. While generally appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and broad application compatibility, there is room for improvement in security, enterprise integration, and the creation of more robust training and documentation resources. Enhancing performance and adding support for traditional relational database concepts could also prove beneficial.
What are MongoDB's most important features?MongoDB finds widespread application across industries like healthcare, logistics, and telecommunications. It efficiently powers IoT platforms, data analytics, and document management systems. Its schema flexibility and JSON storage capabilities make it ideal for real-time processing and multi-server databases, essential for handling large-scale data volumes in modern applications.
MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.
MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.
What are the most important features of MySQL?In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
