"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."
"The clustering is very good. It allows us to have high availability."
"MongoDB is fast and efficient."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to Text Search can be used anywhere and anytime."
"One of the first things I noticed when I had my first experience with MongoDB was how easy it was to use. I was expecting more difficulties or at least some challenges, but it was very, very easy to use. It's great technology, performs well, and is very convenient."
"The most valuable feature is that you can store unstructured data, which is helpful when you don't know what the best structure should be and you cannot use a relational database because of that."
"We've found the product to be scalable."
"The solution's most important aspect is its seamless database."
"The initial setup isn't really that complex."
"The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative."
"MongoDB should better support small and medium companies. There are a lot of clients out there that are interested, however, they need something lighter and less complex and something not so expensive upfront."
"Its security features can be better. Sometimes, my higher authority says that we are not going to use MongoDB because it doesn't provide that much security for the RDBMS or relational data that we use for transactions. Instead of MongoDB, we will use Oracle Database because for a transactional service, you have to rely on RDBMS ACID properties. I would love to work on MongoDB by using my mobile phone. When I am working remotely or traveling and have some instances deployed on my server, I should be able to check through my mobile whether all the data is being pulled. GitHub has a similar feature, where it lets you read from the laptop, and you can also pull and push with your mobile phone. I would request MongoDB to provide such a feature. Basically, I want a mobile version for both iOS and Android versions."
"MongoDB is a very useful and convenient choice, but sometimes for more complex projects, there are certain niche requirements that appear, so using a different tool could be beneficial. It raises the complexity of the architecture, but it could be beneficial to the world, the features, the ease of the features which are being implemented."
"The performance can be improved."
"MongoDB can improve large-size video or media frame operations. There are a lot of customers who want to upload media frames and video games but there is some difficulty. In MongoDB, we are looking out for solutions that are for large-size media files that can be saved and navigated efficiently."
"I suppose it could be a little more secure."
"I feel that most people don't know a lot about MongoDB, so maybe they could add some more documentation and tutorials."
"We'd like technical support to respond faster to queries."
Earn 20 points
InfluxDB is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 1 review while MongoDB is ranked 1st in NoSQL Databases with 31 reviews. InfluxDB is rated 8.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of InfluxDB writes "Good log aggregation features and integration with Grafana". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Quite scalable, easy to deploy, and affordable". InfluxDB is most compared with Cassandra, Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, Oracle NoSQL, SingleStore and Couchbase, whereas MongoDB is most compared with Couchbase, Cassandra, Oracle NoSQL, Neo4j and Scylla.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
