No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Mobius Content Services Platform vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Mobius Content Services Pla...
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
16th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Content Manager
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
13th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
File Archiving (3rd), Document Management Software (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Mobius Content Services Platform is 1.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 3.4%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Content Manager3.4%
Mobius Content Services Platform1.9%
Other94.7%
Enterprise Content Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2597169 - PeerSpot reviewer
manager at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees
Improving data accessibility and security through enhanced interface design
In my current role, we use Mobius to capture data. We are partnered with the government, and the Mobius app is used to ensure accurate data capture. We use it alongside Salesforce to document our clients' entire process as they go through programs, capturing details of their work journey Mobius…
Maurice Riverso - PeerSpot reviewer
Records Management Officer at ANZPAA
Our our official repository and it has disposal management and retention management
The security architecture is the only problem as it's a little bit complex and too torturous at times. So it could be improved a little bit, but it is regarded as a very good system in Australia. It's probably overly subscribed. Also, what's missing is what people would like, which is basically online collaboration. That's a problem. But it has so many other things to offer that SharePoint, I'm sure, will not have. So, that will be an interesting issue to come up. It's not very good at providing stable and robust add-ins to Microsoft. That's a bit of a problem with Content Manager. They're kind of very volatile. So, that's been definitely something that could be improved.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Mobius Content Management Services platform has greatly improved our productivity, taking our time from creation to access from, at times, minutes to expose, to milliseconds to expose, with reports immediately accessible at generation."
"It provides a single pane of glass for delivering content from multiple repositories. It is also highly recommended because of the ease of use when it comes to searching and retrieving from multiple repositories simultaneously."
"Mobius excels in ensuring data security for captured content, which is crucial."
"This solution has improved our organization by providing a central repository for business data with control over sensitive data."
"Archiving is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"For a records management system, Content Manager is a really good system."
"Sharing of documents, reduction of duplication, and the ability to manage retention, disposition and overall records management have been significant benefits for our organization."
"This is a wonderful product with many options."
"An advantage is integration with your IP directory."
"HPE Content Manager provides organizations with a reliable system for managing massive amounts of information, in a structured, compliant and secure way, with a level of functionality and reliability that I have not seen matched by custom-built or other systems."
"We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan."
"Eliminated the need for paper records."
"Go for it."
 

Cons

"When the new version is available, the vendor should make it easier for upgrading this product."
"If it were up to me, I wouldn't use Mobius due to its lack of accessibility and outdated interface."
"The setup and the support could be improved when it comes to populating the reports from a mainframe environment."
"The primary area for improvement is the platform's accessibility."
"Sales and service need to be more consistent."
"The product could improve its scalability."
"This web client requires more refinement to be viable as a desktop client replacement."
"It has extensive configuration restrictions for administrators and file extension limitations. Clunky in look and feel."
"Many projects I've worked on encounter issues in production relating to load balancing and throttling where systems cannot cope with the volumes and capacity of transactional processing."
"The ease of use should be addressed."
"The stability of the solution is an area of concern where improvements can be made."
"Functionality gets removed as new versions are released."
"The system is difficult to navigate and understand the full scope of functionality available for end users to appreciate the value."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are commensurate with other solutions in the market that handle a distributed system environment."
"The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."
"The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."
"I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."
"I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
14%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mobius Content Services Platform?
We don't incur direct costs as the government pays for Mobius, and we use Salesforce for data capturing ourselves.
What needs improvement with Mobius Content Services Platform?
The primary area for improvement is the platform's accessibility. Enhancing the user interface by simplifying it, improving color contrast, and adhering to proper coding standards for assistive...
What is your primary use case for Mobius Content Services Platform?
In my current role, we use Mobius to capture data. We are partnered with the government, and the Mobius app is used to ensure accurate data capture. We use it alongside Salesforce to document our c...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

ASG Mobius, ASG ViewDirect
Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Liberty Mutual
Missouri State Courts
Find out what your peers are saying about Mobius Content Services Platform vs. OpenText Content Manager and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.