We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Workplace by Facebook based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its video calling feature which makes it easier to work on the solution."
"I am part of the pre-sales team. The solution helps me to pass collected information to customers through meetings."
"The solution has improved internal collaboration. We can seamlessly interact on a number of documents by projecting them on the screen. This experience is not with internal teams but with clients as well."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The feature I like most in Microsoft Teams is the ability to work on the same file with other people, for example, on Microsoft PowerPoint, or Microsoft Excel, without needing to share the file via email."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the ease of use. It is very good for a small virtual office for meetings and calendars which sync well together."
"Our company is moving from their Skype for Business to Teams. So I've seen it, I've looked at it, I've used it somewhat enjoyed the UI."
"It is a stable solution."
"The solution is used as a knowledge platform for sharing knowledge and information that everybody can easily access."
"The product was easy to use."
"Storage is the best thing about the solution."
"A full-featured collaboration tool that is as easy to use as Facebook."
"The solution needs to integrate ChatGPT so that the solution can summarize the meetings. The solution needs integration with AI. Copilot is already in the pipeline."
"Teams doesn't always sync to show as Do Not Disturb during Outlook meetings."
"It is challenging to navigate the setting for the screen-sharing feature."
"The software could be optimized for Mac systems because sometimes it is slow and consumes a lot of memory."
"Microsoft Teams could log in faster."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Inability to see large numbers of participants."
"There are a lot of creative people out there who can put some more UI capabilities in Microsoft Teams."
"There needs to be a restriction on who can download content."
"The conferencing feature does not work well with multiple parties or locations."
"The implementation could be made easier."
"The product should allow users to assign tasks and automate processes."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews while Workplace by Facebook is ranked 9th in Enterprise Social Software with 4 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Workplace by Facebook is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Workplace by Facebook writes "A scalable and easy-to-use solution that can be used for internal communication and storage". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Workplace by Facebook is most compared with Yammer and SharePoint. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Workplace by Facebook report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
