Loadbalancer.org vs NGINX Plus comparison

Loadbalancer.org and F5 are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. Loadbalancer.org is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.5, while F5 is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.3. Loadbalancer.org holds a 3.7% mindshare in ADC, compared to F5’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Loadbalancer.org users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of F5 users who would recommend it.

Loadbalancer.org

Read 23 Loadbalancer.org reviews

1,142 Views
1,106 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NGINX Plus

Read 31 NGINX Plus reviews

3,038 Views
2,561 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Loadbalancer.org

NGINX Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

NGINX Plus and Loadbalancer.org are competitive solutions in the load balancing industry. NGINX Plus appears to have an edge in scalability and feature set, whereas Loadbalancer.org is preferred for ease of use and cost-effectiveness.

Features: NGINX Plus offers high connection rates, reverse proxy routing, and the ability to manipulate requests and responses, making it suitable for diverse configurations. Its efficiency in connection rate to CPU cycles and bandwidth management is highly regarded. On the other hand, Loadbalancer.org provides strong application delivery, ease of management, and a user-friendly interface that supports varied workforce capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NGINX Plus could benefit from improved graphical management interfaces, better pricing models, and enhanced module management. Loadbalancer.org should focus on maximizing scalability, simplifying setup processes for larger environments, and increasing integration capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NGINX Plus is adaptable across public cloud, hybrid, and on-premises setups, providing flexibility for various environments. It enjoys robust community support. Loadbalancer.org primarily serves on-premises but offers straightforward setup and strong customer service feedback, ensuring effective support when required.

Pricing and ROI: NGINX Plus provides options between its free and paid versions, aligning with diverse organizational needs, although the pricing for the paid version can be considered high. Loadbalancer.org is noted for good value through flexible pricing models and high customer satisfaction regarding cost-effectiveness. Both solutions contribute to improved ROI by increasing reliability and reducing operational workload.

To learn more, read our detailed Loadbalancer.org vs. NGINX Plus Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Loadbalancer.org vs. NGINX Plus

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Loadbalancer.org

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

12th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NGINX Plus

Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Infrastructure (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of Loadbalancer.org is 3.7%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NGINX Plus is 7.7%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)

Featured Reviews

Roger Seelaender

UCaaS Engineering Manager at EarthLink

Great WAF - low-maintenance solution that performs as advertised

The solution can be improved with the development of a SIP engine because it is difficult to manage SBCs. All SBCs are really tough to write rules for. If we could put this in front of an SBC to have the right rules to possibly block the traffic, that would be very helpful. The solution can also improve the relationship between Loadbalancer.org and Metaswitch, or now, Microsoft because Metaswitch was purchased by Microsoft. They both position themselves as certified but don't always talk to each other. I wish there would be closer integration between the solution and the vendors when either release new upgrades to their product line. Often we find issues on either end post upgrades.

Read full review

Michael Olayemi

Senior Software Engineer at Checkit

Enables public access and secure configurations through reverse proxy

The primary valuable feature of NGINX for me is its ability to provide a reverse proxy. I have found that this feature supports our local server, and I am able to connect through our DNS system, making it accessible publicly. Additionally, the integration with SSL certificates and the configuration capabilities make it a valuable solution for my use case. Without NGINX, users would not be able to access our application, which means there is positive ROI from using NGINX as it is crucial for the functioning of my organization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It does what it’s supposed to do which is balancing an important intranet site we are using, so if one server dies, the second becomes active straight away."

"Load balancing helps us distribute both incoming and outgoing data loads evenly among the servers, preventing overload on a single server."

"The connection that this solution helps our servers maintain has been most useful."

"Most important for us that it makes sure that the load is distributed and that we always have access to the end servers."

"We can more easily set up a test environment, because you can easily configure your forms. It makes it more flexible for us, to convert our test environment to a production environment, without having to change DNSs on the outside. You just configure the forms on the inside. So without changing the actual endpoint for the end user, we can create completely different networks in the background."

"Loadbalancer.org is less complex than Citrix."

"The features I find valuable in this solution are the ease of managing the logs on the WAFs, the ease to identify break-in attempts into the network, the front-end firewall, and a more specific firewall."

"The user interface precludes need to be well versed with Linux IPVS command line. This make it easy for junior team members to participate in managing load balancing needs."

More Loadbalancer.org pros

"The product is resilient."

"With NGINX, I appreciate its ability to route traffic geographically."

"The most valuable features are the gateway and the ability to publish to sites."

"I find the solution’s community support and documentation most valuable. Compared to HAProxy, have found a lot of documentation and community support on Quora. If you would be asking me as a developer whether to choose this product, I would recommend this since it has good community support, documentation, and signature updates. The configuration of HAProxy is also very tedious. However, NGINX’s configuration is very simple."

"I think installation only took a couple of minutes — no more than 10 minutes."

"The overall product rating is ten out of ten."

"Nginx is simple to configure, very stable in a highly utilized environment and very modular, allowing DevOps to create it's own modules for interactive use with Nginx."

"NGINX provides a cost advantage, value addition, and effective support."

More NGINX Plus pros

Cons

"It doesn't have the bonding capability feature."

"You can run into an issue when one engineer passes the case over to another engineer after their shift and they don't know what the first engineer worked on up to that point."

"There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience."

"There is room for improvement in Loadbalancer.org in certain areas."

"They're mostly designed to balance a particular type of traffic. I wanted to load balance DNS, and they just don't do it the way that we wanted to. So they're not used as DNS load balancers."

"Originally we had some stability issues with it, so they replaced it with a new box and it's fine."

"We could enhance the security aspects of the load balancer."

"An area for improvement in Loadbalancer.org is that sometimes it works fine, but sometimes, it has issues. The setup for Loadbalancer.org is also complex, so that's another area for improvement."

More Loadbalancer.org cons

"The user interface could be improved."

"Initially, I experienced hiccups whenever I installed the application. As with any application, there were initial issues, however, after receiving support, everything was rectified."

"NGINX is a very basic load balancer and cannot do as many customizations as F5."

"I would like it to have a more user-friendly graphical interface."

"The center management system could be improved."

"Lack of a feature to print data on the terminal for verification of network traffic during debugging and testing."

"The scalability could be improved."

"The KPI should be more focused on load balancing and the latency in application calling from the end system."

More NGINX Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It filled a requirement for our project, and it did so at lesser cost than their competitors."

"For now, it's stable."

"I love that they do not price on some arbitrary throughput rating where you are guessing at what the load balancer is going to handle."

"It was easy to upgrade the license for unlimited clusters and servers. Pricing is fair."

"The solution requires an annual support license of $2,780 for four systems or $695 a year per unit for support not including the units."

"We've got an unlimited license, which doesn't costs that much compared to other vendors, and we don't have to buy it again."

"The costs associated with Loadbalancer.org depends on the technology. For some, we need to pay, but others are open, so they're free."

"Licensing fees are paid annually."

More Loadbalancer.org pricing and cost advice

"NGINX is a free tool in Brazil. There are some companies which do support it."

"HAProxy is cheaper than NGINX."

"It's an open source solution, so it's free."

"The price is the cost to contract support with a specialized company, usually during consulting hours."

"NGINX Plus is worth it, if you need it. If you do not need the features or support, the free and open source package is more than capable. "

"The cost is reasonable."

"Nginx is free. I don't have experience with the Plus version."

"Compared to other similar solutions on the market, I think it's over-priced."

More NGINX Plus pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

University

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Do you recommend Loadbalancer.org?

Since Loadbalancer.org is an open-source solution, I would recommend this solution for smaller businesses that don’t have major scaling requirements and don’t have the budget for a commercial solut...

See all answers

What do you like most about Loadbalancer.org?

Existing customers are trying to migrate from the physical F5 load balancer to the AVI load balancer because it is scalable and easily managed.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Loadbalancer.org?

Pricing of Loadbalancer.org is something to consider.

See all answers

Which is better - IIS or NGINX Plus?

IIS is a flexible, secure, and manageable web server to host anything on the web. IIS’s scalable and open architecture can handle the most demanding tasks. From media streaming to web applications,...

See all answers

What do you like most about NGINX Plus?

It performs very well. That's one of the primary reasons we use NGINX.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX Plus?

My use case involves using the free and open-source version of NGINX, making it cost-effective as I haven't incurred any costs.

See all answers

Comparisons

NetScaler vs Loadbalancer.org

Compared 24% of the time

HAProxy vs Loadbalancer.org

Compared 20% of the time

Fortinet FortiADC vs Loadbalancer.org

Compared 16% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Loadbalancer.org

Compared 13% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Loadbalancer.org

Compared 3% of the time

More Loadbalancer.org Competitors

IIS vs NGINX Plus

Compared 17% of the time

HAProxy vs NGINX Plus

Compared 14% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs NGINX Plus

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Web Server vs NGINX Plus

Compared 11% of the time

IBM WebSphere Application Server vs NGINX Plus

Compared 1% of the time

More NGINX Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Loadbalancer.org

June 2025

Download Loadbalancer.org product report

Buyer's Guide

NGINX Plus

May 2025

Download NGINX Plus product report

Also Known As

No data available

NGINX

Overview

Loadbalancer.org is a versatile solution that offers load balancing for small businesses, multiple instances of applications, web application firewall, publishing Windows and SQL applications, and security for telephone service systems. It is easy to use, cost-effective, and performs well with low latency.

The connection maintenance and security features are valuable, including managing logs on WAFs, identifying break-in attempts writing rules to block them and using HAProxy to control what is allowed. Loadbalancer.org has helped organizations reduce the impact of connection issues, provide security, and ensure no downtime or impact on productivity.

Top Industries that use Loadbalancer.org:

Healthcare: Loadbalancer.org is widely considered the top load balancer provider in the healthcare IT industry. Loadbalancer.org sees that healthcare IT personnel can ensure their organizations are moving seamlessly toward interoperability and are able to easily scale to meet today’s continually growing data demands with no compromise in performance.

Storage solutions: Loadbalancer.org has significant offerings and partnerships with object-based storage providers to ensure they are always ready for today's ever-changing dynamic storage needs. The comprehensive integration offers high-performance scalable solutions which can provide always available next-gen storage solutions.

Security: Loadbalancer.org solutions provide an extra layer of security to protect against the latest risk and threats. Loadbalancer.org will provide a close integration to ensure the organization is always secure.

Print: Loadbalancer.org can work with organizations to ensure their print environments keep working smoothly and is the only organization that fully supports Microsoft Print load balancing. Loadbalancer.org minimizes the complexities of print environments to ensure that all systems are consistently available.

Loadbalancer.org is certified as an OEM provider for all of Microsoft's most popular key applications and solutions. Loadbalancer.org has created and developed streamlined deployments to facilitate improved scalability, performance, and uptime. They offer a tailored GUI to make every process super easy. Loadbalancer.org offers several flexible licensing plans to ensure cost-effectiveness, improved margins, revenue opportunities, and optimized TCO. The numerous robust solutions Loadbalancer.org offers can ensure that any enterprise organization is able to satisfy the growing demands of today’s dynamic marketplace while maintaining an excellent user experience.

Reviews from Real Users

“Loadbalancer.org is less complex than Citrix. In some cases, our customers do not have an engineer on staff who can support this device. These customers have a large number of Linux engineers but don't have the money. We suggested using Loadbalancer.org and other open-source tools. Many customers are of different sizes and have different budgets. Loadbalancer.org has everything that is needed.” - Artem M., System Engineer at CROC

“We use Loadbalancer for balancing loads in our main application. Loadbalancer is easy to use. It performs well, with low latency.” - Walid M., Network and Security Engineer at a logistics company

Loadbalancer.org

NGINX Plus is a versatile solution that offers load balancing, caching, proxying, and API deployment capabilities. It can be deployed on private or public clouds and is ideal for building CDN solutions. The solution can also be used to secure web applications and replace web services like Apache.

NGINX has helped organizations improve functioning, reduce downtimes, and offer a DevOps-friendly solution. Its community support and documentation are highly regarded, and its configuration is more straightforward, making it a recommended choice over HAProxy.

Sample Customers

Vodafone, NASA, Mercedes, NBC, Siemens, AT&T, Barclays, Zurich, Penn State University, Fiserv, Canon, Toyota, University of Cambridge, US Army, US Navy, Ocean Spray, ASOS, Pfizer, BBC, Bacardi, Monsoon, River Island, U.S Air Force, King's College London, NHS, Ricoh, Philips, Santander, TATA Communications, Ericcson, Ross Video, Evertz, TalkTalk TV, Giacom, Rapid Host.

Locaweb, AppNexus, Wix, Reliam, Montana Interactive, MuleSoft, Warpwire, Discovery Education, InkaBinka, WordPress.com, Gogo, GOV.UK, NASA

Buyer's Guide

Loadbalancer.org vs. NGINX Plus

June 2025

Free Report: Loadbalancer.org vs. NGINX Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about Loadbalancer.org vs. NGINX Plus and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Loadbalancer.org vs. NGINX Plus report.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.