We performed a comparison between Loadbalancer.org and NGINX Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The performance is good."
"For now, it's stable."
"The connection that this solution helps our servers maintain has been most useful."
"It's pretty much a Swiss Army knife for managing all the load balancing techniques."
"Loadbalancer.org is less complex than Citrix."
"Loadbalancer is easy to use. It performs well, with low latency."
"The load balancing module, which is equivalent to LTM, is the focus of the PSE. So far, the features of both are identical. I believe NGINX has more features for securing these services, but in terms of load balancing, both are massive solutions."
"I think installation only took a couple of minutes — no more than 10 minutes."
"This solution has everything."
"NGINX Plus also has NGINX App Protect. It's a separate module, which is inspired by the F5 apps."
"NGINX Plus' most valuable feature is the ingress controller."
"The web proxy and the database proxy are excellent."
"The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging."
"The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging."
"I would like it if Loadbalancer had the ability to make rules for specific shared bots."
"It doesn't have the bonding capability feature."
"Loadbalancer.org's complexity could be reduced."
"I'd like to see scalability improved; it can be costly."
"The solution can be a bit pricey."
"The drawback is that you must obtain a license for everything."
"The center management system could be improved."
"NGINX Plus is moderately priced, but it could give better value for money."
"The scaling should be built into the software rather than configured from an outside source."
"It would be great if there was even more automation to make it even easier to maintain."
"NGINX is a very basic load balancer and cannot do as many customizations as F5."
Loadbalancer.org is ranked 9th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 6 reviews while NGINX Plus is ranked 5th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 6 reviews. Loadbalancer.org is rated 7.6, while NGINX Plus is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Loadbalancer.org writes "Reliable, very complete, and suitable for sizeable organizations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NGINX Plus writes "Quick installation and very easy to manage while doing orchestration or automation". Loadbalancer.org is most compared with HAProxy, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix ADC, Kemp LoadMaster and A10 Networks Thunder ADC, whereas NGINX Plus is most compared with IIS, HAProxy, Kemp LoadMaster, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform. See our Loadbalancer.org vs. NGINX Plus report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
