Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] vs OpenText Identity Manager comparison

The compared Microsoft and OpenText solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #9 in UP , with an average rating of 7.7, and holds a 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
OpenText Identity Manager
Read 18 OpenText Identity Manager reviews
  • 1,316 Views
  • 619 Comparison Views
87% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] and OpenText Identity Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, CrowdStrike, Trend Micro and others in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) Report (Updated: October 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
October 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra Permissions...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Identity Manager
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
User Provisioning Software (9th), Identity Management (IM) (17th)
 

Featured Reviews

Sameer Bhat - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem
Entra ID is the core of the identity management that we have. This is the key product that we are using. I am currently also looking into Entra Private Access because we are planning to deploy about 50,000 desktops into Azure and use Azure Virtual Desktop. We would like to give access to the users from the desktop to on-premises applications. I learned that Entra Private Access is a good solution. That is not yet GA, but that is what we are looking for. Entra provides a single pane of glass for managing user access, but because our company also integrates with Nebula API, only administrators use Entra's pane. A normal person who wants to get onboarded can do self-service using Nebula. The features for whitelisting and other things are definitely there. That is what we use specifically. Application IDs, enterprise applications, and all those things are already there, so we have more efficiency. There is also security because we usually do not allow user identities to get direct access to Azure resources. Usually, we use the service principles from Entra ID, so this way, it increases security. Entra has helped to save time for our IT administrators. We tend to automate a lot of things. We can do automation using Graph APIs and save time. It is hard to quantify the time savings, but there has been a medium amount of time savings. Entra has helped to save our organization money. We care about security and risk more than money, but it also saves money. We are premium customers, and because we have a commit-to-consume contract with Microsoft of multi-million dollars, the money does not come into it because we have to consume those resources.
Read full review
SYAMSUL SALAM - PeerSpot reviewer
The product is affordable and easy to use, but the technical support must be improved
The solution is used to manage SSO and login for internal applications The product enables detailed user management. The product is easy to use. Our users found it easier than Microsoft Identity Manager. The solution must add more configurations. There are different types of user identity in…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"The solution integrates well with our infrastructure and other systems without any issues."
"NetIQ does not have a limit on the number of users."
"The most valuable feature of NetIQ Identity Manager for identity synchronization is the ability to provide users with all necessary access on day one through automated provisioning, facilitated by approval workflows."
"The product is easy to use."
"The access request management has improved significantly in terms of its user interface. What sets it apart from competitors like SailPoint is that it's an event-based solution rather than schedule-based. That's a key differentiator."
"I like the eDirectory feature."
"The main value lies in the simplicity of implementation, as well as its customized look and feel."
"The most valuable features of NetIQ Identity Manager are the synchronization of different directories, such as Active Directory. We have many Active Directory systems, not only one."
"The most valuable feature of this solution has been the ability for us to integrate a lot of external systems, and the automatic transfer of a lot of identity information. Additionally, the customization is very good."
More OpenText Identity Manager pros
 

Cons

"The solution's pricing and support services need improvement."
"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
"We have another system that is using the SAML system, and we also integrate with Active Directory only. If NetIQ Identity Manager can integrate directly, we would not need to use the Active Directory directory."
"The interface is old and outdated, and the design software seems archaic."
"The vendor must provide an easier console for configuring things for smaller customers."
"If it could be operated in such a way that anybody could use it, with just the user interface, and there's no need for programming, then that would be a great improvement."
"NetIQ Identity Manager could improve by updating the user portal, it is out of date."
"The integrations must be made easier."
"The solution architecture is somewhat complex. For some components, the necessary resilience is not inherent."
"It needs some modern features. They should improve and modernize their management interface. It has been created over years and by different persons. You can see different applications, different management consoles for different things. There should be an integrated interface."
More OpenText Identity Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product cost is in the mid to high range."
"We are a Fortune 500 company, so we always negotiate with Microsoft."
"Micro Focus is flexible when it comes to price. The cost varies from customer to customer. There are no additional costs, though. Everything is included."
"The price of the solution is a bit high and could be reduced."
"I would rate the pricing a two out of ten, with one being low price and ten being high price. It is significantly more cost-effective than the major players in the market."
"It would easily help them in getting more market and more customers if more consultants knew about their software. If they could keep it free for schools for teaching purposes, it would be good. I had to pay myself to get it and use it for training. Their competitors are giving it for free. I had to pay for it myself. They are losing market to their competitors."
"You just need to be aware that the more systems you connect, the more license fees you have to pay."
"The solution is quite affordable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Transportation Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
Multifactor authentication is valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
The product cost is in the mid to high range. You need to have a good budget to implement it, so it is considered fairly expensive for our market. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Permissions Management?
The solution's pricing and support services need improvement.
See all answers
What do you like most about NetIQ Identity Manager?
The most valuable feature of NetIQ Identity Manager for identity synchronization is the ability to provide users with all necessary access on day one through automated provisioning, facilitated by ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetIQ Identity Manager?
The pricing depends on whether we buy the solution as a service or a license. The license is expensive. If we buy it as a service for a large number of users, it is the cheapest tool we can get. Th...
See all answers
What needs improvement with NetIQ Identity Manager?
The tool is used mostly in big systems to understand what is happening. There are not many technicians who know how to use the product. The vendor must provide an easier console for configuring thi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 27% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 21% of the time
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Microsoft Intune vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 19% of the time
VMware Aria Automation vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
VMware Aria Automation vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 18% of the time
Saviynt vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Logo
Saviynt vs Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]
Compared 15% of the time
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] Competitors
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OpenText Identity Manager Logo
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs OpenText Identity Manager
Compared 21% of the time
Microsoft Entra ID vs OpenText Identity Manager Logo
Microsoft Entra ID vs OpenText Identity Manager
Compared 16% of the time
One Identity Manager vs OpenText Identity Manager Logo
One Identity Manager vs OpenText Identity Manager
Compared 10% of the time
EVOLVEUM midPoint vs OpenText Identity Manager Logo
EVOLVEUM midPoint vs OpenText Identity Manager
Compared 7% of the time
SAP Identity Management vs OpenText Identity Manager Logo
SAP Identity Management vs OpenText Identity Manager
Compared 7% of the time
More OpenText Identity Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
October 2025
Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] reportDownload Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Identity Manager
September 2025
OpenText Identity Manager reportDownload OpenText Identity Manager product report
 

Also Known As

CloudKnox Permissions Management
Novell Identity Manager
 

Overview

Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] provides robust access control and identity management, enhancing security by optimizing permissions and reducing risk.

This advanced platform offers comprehensive capabilities designed to streamline identity management. It empowers organizations to manage permissions efficiently, enhancing security frameworks while addressing compliance needs. By focusing on visibility and control, it optimizes access to ensure the right resources are available to the right users, reducing excessive permission grants and potential security vulnerabilities.

What are the main features of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?
  • Advanced Visibility: Gain insights into permissions to identify and address security risks.
  • Access Optimization: Align permissions with actual usage to prevent over-privileged access.
  • Compliance Integration: Streamline compliance processes with built-in reporting tools.
What benefits should you consider when evaluating Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL]?
  • Improved Security Posture: Reduces risk by eliminating excessive permissions.
  • Enhanced Compliance: Eases regulatory compliance with robust auditing features.
  • Operational Efficiency: Saves time and resources by automating permission management.

In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Microsoft Entra Permissions Management [EOL] plays a crucial role in maintaining data integrity and regulatory compliance. Its implementation allows organizations to seamlessly integrate permission management into existing security infrastructures, providing tailored solutions that address sector-specific requirements and challenges.

Microsoft

OpenText Identity Manager provides event-driven capabilities with real-time synchronization and integration across multiple systems. Known for its flexibility, it offers features like password sync, access management, and directory synchronization.

OpenText Identity Manager is a comprehensive identity management platform, designed to support role-based provisioning and seamless integration of external systems. Its notable features include the Designer and Analyzer tools and robust self-service password management, enhancing its usability. Organizations leverage its event-driven architecture for real-time synchronization and detailed tracing, facilitating efficient identity management across different data sources. However, enhancements in Windows OS compatibility, user interface modernization, and cloud support are needed. Training remains crucial, given the system's complexity and unique language.

What are the Key Features of OpenText Identity Manager?
  • Real-time Synchronization: Event-driven architecture enables instant updates across systems.
  • Role Based Provisioning: Streamlines managing roles and permissions within organizations.
  • Flexible Integration: Connects with multiple data sources, enhancing system interoperability.
  • Password Synchronization: Simplifies password management across platforms.
  • Access Management: Offers tools to manage permissions and security with ease.
Why Consider OpenText Identity Manager in Reviews?
  • Comprehensive Support: Offers identity lifecycle management, enhancing user experience.
  • Security Enhancements: Improves compliance management and access control.
  • Scalability: Efficiently supports large-scale enterprise environments.
  • Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with existing infrastructure.

In industries ranging from large corporations to local banks, OpenText Identity Manager supports account provisioning and access management, primarily through Active Directory integration. By connecting with applications like Oracle, PeopleSoft, and Office 365, it facilitates lifecycle and compliance management. Its deployment aids training and real-world application with single sign-on options for internal applications, providing a comprehensive identity management solution for diverse environments.

OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Sheetz
Buyer's Guide
Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM)
October 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SailPoint, CrowdStrike, Trend Micro and others in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM). Updated: October 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.