We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."Enabled MFA to access federated applications as well as increased user satisfaction through improved provisioning times and more reliable processes."
"This solution has a lot of capabilities and features."
"The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."
"Okta Workforce Identity is easy to use and has a lot of components."
"A solution that's easy to use, stable, and reliable."
"Workforce Identity's best features include its user-friendliness and easy setup."
"The initial setup is easy."
"It is flexible and easy to install."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The product is expensive compared to other tools."
"It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup."
"They should focus on improving them to provide top-notch team access management while still offering those typical features."
"The guest user access could be improved."
"Support could be a bit faster."
"We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito."
"It can have more API integrations."
"A room for improvement in Okta Workforce Identity is its price. It could be cheaper. The biggest benefit of the solution is that everything works securely without extra steps, so you're saving on your workforce's time and effort because your applications work smoothly and securely, but you'd need to pay some amount of money for that. Another area that could be improved, though not necessarily regarding Okta Workforce Identity, is the SSO applications because so many of the source applications charge extra money to put the SSO to work, which means you have to buy a more expensive license. Nowadays, SSO is a mainstream functionality and it should be out-of-the-box in those applications because it's so easy to set up."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Single Sign-On (SSO). Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Auth0 and SailPoint IdentityIQ.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.