Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microgen Aptitude [EOL] vs Windows Server AppFabric comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microgen Aptitude [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Windows Server AppFabric
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (18th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use Microgen Aptitude [EOL]?
Share your opinion
VIJAY RAGAVAN - PeerSpot reviewer
Ensure seamless deployment and networking with a focus on critical uptime
The most important issue I've found is the blue screen errors, particularly when customers use external displays with a P-type cable. I have advised against using external displays for crucial applications and recommended using VGA or laptop adapter screens to mitigate this issue. However, the blue screen error remains a major concern because it causes data loss during reboots.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
861,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Windows Server AppFabric?
The product's deployment phase was very easy.
What needs improvement with Windows Server AppFabric?
The most important issue I've found is the blue screen errors, particularly when customers use external displays with a P-type cable. I have advised against using external displays for crucial appl...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Aptitude
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Online Media Distributor
OSIsoft
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: June 2025.
861,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.