OpenText Functional Testing and Telerik Test Studio are automated testing solutions. OpenText stands out in reliability and system integration, while Telerik provides a user-friendly interface and advanced testing tools.
Features: OpenText offers strong integration with enterprise IT systems, versatile testing environments, and support for various applications. Telerik excels in advanced test creation, execution, and cross-browser testing capabilities with intuitive dashboards.
Room for Improvement: OpenText could improve its deployment complexity and initial setup costs and enhance its cross-platform testing features. Telerik can enhance its support for larger IT landscapes, improve long-term maintenance benefits, and add enterprise-level integration features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik offers a simple deployment process and extensive support resources for quick adoption. OpenText, while more complex to deploy, provides comprehensive support that addresses implementation challenges.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves higher initial costs but promises long-term ROI through reduced maintenance and robust integration. Telerik is cost-effective upfront, offering quicker ROI, particularly appealing to small and medium enterprises.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.8% |
| Telerik Test Studio | 1.1% |
| Other | 90.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
