OpenText Functional Testing and Sauce Labs compete in the software testing category, particularly focusing on functional and regression testing capabilities. Sauce Labs may have the upper hand due to its wide support for cross-browser and cross-platform testing with ease of integration into CI/CD pipelines, while OpenText Functional Testing boasts an extensive toolset for detailed scripting and object repository management.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing provides advanced scripting with VBScript, sophisticated object repository management, and integrated test management, making it a comprehensive tool for functional and regression testing. Sauce Labs offers extensive cross-browser and cross-platform testing capabilities using real devices and virtual machines. Its ability to provide detailed video recording and analytics is also appreciated by users.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing could enhance its support for modern programming languages, simplify its licensing and reduce memory usage. Users have also noted performance issues in some scenarios. Sauce Labs could improve debugging and connectivity for different regions, as some users experience latency. Enhancements in speed and intuitive user interface can also be beneficial.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing typically requires an on-premises or private cloud setup, which can be robust but complex, and its customer support is sometimes slow. Conversely, Sauce Labs is primarily cloud-based, which simplifies deployment and scalability. Its customer service is generally more responsive with actionable feedback.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is known for its high upfront licensing fees, making it suitable for enterprises with extensive automation needs. It offers significant ROI through its automation capabilities reducing manual testing. Sauce Labs, though also considered expensive, offers flexible pricing models that scale with usage, yielding cost savings and high return on investment due to enhanced test coverage and quicker market deployment.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Organizations can't wait for this lengthy process, especially when they are under pressure with their timelines.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
I would rate the support for this product a seven on a scale of one to ten.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The ease of being able to create scripts using the AI tools are the differentiating factors.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 7.1% |
| Sauce Labs | 5.0% |
| Other | 87.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 33 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 26 |
| Large Enterprise | 73 |
OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.
OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.
Sauce Labs is a functional testing tool that ensures your apps and websites work flawlessly on every browser, OS, and device. The solution allows you to automate functional testing on multiple operating systems and browsers, emulating the way that a user would use the website. With Sauce Labs, you can also run tests on various operating system and browser combinations in parallel, reducing the amount of time to get results. The Sauce Labs solution provides enterprise-grade security, scalability, and reliability.
Sauce Labs Features
Sauce Labs has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Sauce Labs Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Sauce Labs. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Sauce Labs is a solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. It has valuable features that include error logging, helpful dashboards, and its browser.
Joel A., Product Manager - Data & APIs at a marketing services firm, says, "The error logging is very robust. If we run a test through Sauce Labs and there's some sort of issue, a log will appear on the screen. Log messages are usually heinous and horrible... Sauce Labs is incredibly good at saying things like, 'Hey, here is the exact issue. Fix this and you can run the test.' That helps in getting things up and running and executing the way they should."
Savio D., Sr. IT Architect at a healthcare company, mentions, "Sauce Labs' dashboards contain multiple useful metrics in one place. Everything is represented to us visually on the dashboard, which helps us understand where to focus our attention, what the issues are, and what we need to resolve."
PeerSpot reviewer, Rob L., Director of Quality Assurance - Shared Service at a financial services firm, writes, “The most valuable feature for us is the browser. The most critical thing is that this software aligns with our Agile and DevOps way of doing things. It integrates with kickoff scripts through DevOps.”
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
