Oracle Application Testing Suite and OpenText Functional Testing for Developers compete in the software testing tools category. Oracle Application Testing Suite seems to have the upper hand due to its strong integration with Oracle products and comprehensive feature set.
Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers automation, load testing, and detailed reporting, making it valuable for Oracle ERP projects. It integrates well with Oracle ecosystem products. OpenText Functional Testing is known for its ease of use and developer-friendly environment, supporting multiple programming languages and IDE integration, which benefits development teams.
Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve its object identification and cross-platform compatibility, and expand support for non-Oracle applications. Users note complex setup. OpenText Functional Testing needs better object recognition and stability in complex scenarios, alongside enhanced flexibility and support for diverse technologies.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite supports on-premises and hybrid cloud deployments, providing responsive customer service and expert assistance. OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers on-premises and public cloud options, with generally positive customer service and effective issue resolution.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is cost-effective, especially when bundled with other Oracle solutions, offering good ROI through reduced licensing costs. OpenText Functional Testing has high licensing costs, often challenging for smaller companies, though it provides competitive options for larger enterprises. Both solutions deliver substantial ROI, maximizing automation and integration benefits in large-scale environments.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| Oracle Application Testing Suite | 1.3% |
| Other | 95.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
