Mezmo vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

Mezmo and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Mezmo is ranked #89, while SolarWinds is ranked #57. Mezmo holds a 0.1% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Mezmo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

494 Views
237 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

603 Views
555 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Mezmo

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Mezmo and SolarWinds Pingdom based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Mezmo vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mezmo vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mezmo

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

89th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (54th), Observability Pipeline Software (7th)

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

57th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Mezmo is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities

Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."

"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"

"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."

"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."

Cons

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."

"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."

"Technical support could use some improvement."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"While I wouldn't describe it as excessively expensive, if you require specific and reliable monitoring, SolarWinds can be a suitable option. The advantage is that SolarWinds offers a free version as well. If you don't heavily rely on its monitoring capabilities and are content with its basic features, the free version could suffice for your needs."

"The license was paid yearly and included technical support."

"This price of this solution is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

23%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 49% of the time

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 28% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Mezmo

Compared 23% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 29% of the time

Grafana vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 21% of the time

Catchpoint vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 18% of the time

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 17% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 14% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Mezmo

June 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

July 2025

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Also Known As

LogDNA

No data available

Overview

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

Mezmo vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

July 2025

Free Report: Mezmo vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about Mezmo vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mezmo vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.