Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

McKesson Paragon [EOL] vs MediNous comparison

McKesson and MediNous are both solutions in the Hospital Information System category.
MediNous
  • 60 Views
  • 60 Comparison Views

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

McKesson Paragon [EOL]
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MediNous
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Hospital Information System (7th)
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Paragon
No data available
 

Overview

Provides uninterrupted access to critical data and systems.

McKesson

Medinous Hospital Information System (HIS) has a multi-tier architecture that is divided into User Interface, Application and (DB) Database. Medinous product architecture is an excellent fit for a distributed environment as it helps get all the related operational information under control-within one system. Distinguished application advantages: Client-Side Execution Capability & Reliability, Engaging Rich Graphical User Interface (RGUI)Robustness and Security of WCF Architecture and Ideal for Distributed Architecture

MediNous
 

Sample Customers

Illinois Valley Community Hospital
Sharjah's Oldest & Highly Reputed Hospital, Medium Sized Hospital in Mauritius, The Largest Private Hospital in Oman, A Leading Multi-Specialty Medical Centre in Bahrain, One of the Biggest Government Teaching Hospitals in India, A Modern Polyclinic in Kuwait, A Large Polyclinic in Kuala Lumpur
See our list of best Hospital Information System vendors.

We monitor all Hospital Information System reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.