McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention comparison

McAfee and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. McAfee is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.5, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. McAfee holds a 0.9% mindshare in DLP, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

McAfee Total Protection for...

Read 31 McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention reviews

1,812 Views
616 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention reviews

2,019 Views
2,019 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

McAfee Total Protection for...

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention are competing in the data security category. Palo Alto Networks seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive suite of features, whereas McAfee is more favored for its affordability and support.

Features: McAfee focuses on robust encryption, endpoint coverage, and offers extensive control policies. It seamlessly integrates into existing infrastructures. Palo Alto Networks features sophisticated machine learning analytics and context-based data protection, which provide deeper insights. It surpasses McAfee's broader security measures with these advanced technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee provides a straightforward deployment backed by detailed documentation and responsive technical help. Its process is accessible for organizations with limited IT resources. Palo Alto Networks' deployment is more intricate due to advanced functionalities, but it is supported by a knowledgeable support team offering specialized assistance.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee presents an attractive entry price, focusing on minimizing initial investment and delivering a quick return, making it financially feasible. Palo Alto Networks requires a higher initial investment, which is justified by its enriched feature set and may lead to a longer-term ROI for businesses prioritizing advanced security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,928 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Total Protection for...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

23rd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention	2.1%
McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention	0.9%
Other	97.0%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Kalidas Mangle

Sr. System Engineer at Zensar Technologies

Data protection has improved as we restrict uploads to third-party sites and control devices

We are using customizable policies in the product. Everything is fine regarding alerting and reporting features; we got a notification as well as we received the required events, and it is working well. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is different; whatever the logs are there, they are available on the ePO, so we cannot directly integrate DLP to any third-party tool. We need to actually integrate the ePO itself to enable integration. We are just restricting data to be uploaded, which is the best option that allows us to control organizational data, making it the biggest benefit for us in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention. We are protecting data to be uploaded on third party URLs, which helps us meet our needs.

Read full review

Jamie A Larkin

Senior Solutions Specials at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Comprehensive security solution enhances data classification and protection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox. Compared to competitors, these are often additional add-ons, whereas Palo Alto Networks provides a complete solution. The artificial intelligence integration in the product also helps immensely by classifying data, identifying data, and monitoring user access and behavior, thus improving data security strategies.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I am impressed with the tool's firewalls and web protection."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices."

"The most valuable feature of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is data loss prevention."

"The whitelisting works well."

"The overall features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are very good."

"Everything in this DLP is great. It"

"The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly."

"The product is largely stable."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pros

"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."

"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."

"It is a stable solution with good support."

"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox."

"The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

Cons

"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."

"The product uses a lot of resources and because of this it is not always a good solution for every situation."

"Our client is not very happy with the lack of support, the skills, and the effectiveness of the tool."

"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating."

"The UI needs to be simplified."

"There are a lot of vulnerabilities and viruses and malware can proliferate."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention needs to improve the resources it uses for CPU and RAM."

"When this solution is used it requires a lot of administration because the users can have difficulties using it and require assistance. The administrators are continuously modifying the policies for the users. Technical support will be used frequently."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention cons

"The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved."

"Pricing is expensive."

"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."

"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."

"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."

"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."

"There are mostly performance issues."

"The configuration for Palo Alto Networks firewalls requires specifying many details, such as protocols and services."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."

"I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."

"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"It's not a cheap option."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

"The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."

"The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."

"It's expensive."

"Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

I rate the pricing for McAfee as competitive compared to other companies; they are in the same range, not a cheap product and not an expensive product.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues. Sometim...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

We are working with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Trellix products in our environment, but not all the products; we are using only the DLP product. We are using DLP and devic...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks' pricing can be complex. Their catalog is extensive. They have a licensing model based on credits for virtual machine firewalls or containers, which simplifies the process, while...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved. Simplifying the initial setup procedure could also be beneficial as it currently requ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The primary use case is a part of a complete package for Government of Canada. It helps in comparing data loss prevention against Fortinet, making it a cost-effective solution. It is used in the co...

See all answers

Comparisons

HP Wolf Security vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 58% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Trellix DLP vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Digital Guardian vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Cyera vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 32% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 14% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 7% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

January 2026

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report

Download McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data

No data available

Overview

McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

McAfee

Cloud-Delivered Data Protection: The industry’s first cloud-delivered Enterprise DLP that consistently protects sensitive data across all networks, clouds and users.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Kleberg Bank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

February 2026

Free Report: McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,928 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.