McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention comparison

McAfee and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. McAfee is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.7, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.3. McAfee holds a 1.0% mindshare in DLP, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of McAfee users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

McAfee Total Protection for...

Read 29 McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention reviews

489 Views
353 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention reviews

1,743 Views
488 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

McAfee Total Protection for...

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention are competing in the data security category. Palo Alto Networks seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive suite of features, whereas McAfee is more favored for its affordability and support.

Features: McAfee focuses on robust encryption, endpoint coverage, and offers extensive control policies. It seamlessly integrates into existing infrastructures. Palo Alto Networks features sophisticated machine learning analytics and context-based data protection, which provide deeper insights. It surpasses McAfee's broader security measures with these advanced technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee provides a straightforward deployment backed by detailed documentation and responsive technical help. Its process is accessible for organizations with limited IT resources. Palo Alto Networks' deployment is more intricate due to advanced functionalities, but it is supported by a knowledgeable support team offering specialized assistance.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee presents an attractive entry price, focusing on minimizing initial investment and delivering a quick return, making it financially feasible. Palo Alto Networks requires a higher initial investment, which is justified by its enriched feature set and may lead to a longer-term ROI for businesses prioritizing advanced security capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

McAfee Total Protection for...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

27th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

VivekGupta7

DGM at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Versatile with good patching and a straightforward setup

There is some fine-tuning needed, even once you define something. We need to do a lot of configuration. It would be easier if they made the configuration simpler, especially in the beginning. They need to give the user more choices and provide more guidance to help avoid problems later on. We'd like some more built-in predictive analytics so we can be prepared for what might happen in the future. We did have some bandwidth issues during setup. If your update fails, you may have stability issues. We find it difficult to reach higher levels of support when we face larger issues.

Read full review

OusaidAbaz

Security Network Architect at Inmac

Streamlines firewall management and has reliable security features

The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites. Additionally, the security modules like Data Loss Prevention and antivirus are vital as they integrate into the firewall to protect endpoints. These features are automated via cloud connections to Palo Alto Networks, ensuring up-to-date security signatures.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Offers some good protection features."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is a very stable product."

"What I like about McAfee Total Protection is that it's working. I also like that it doesn't require any specific knowledge to set up."

"The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices."

"Enables customization of file types and for different scenarios."

"The pricing of the product is excellent. It's very affordable."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pros

"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."

"It is a stable solution with good support."

"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."

"The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites."

Cons

"There are a lot of vulnerabilities and viruses and malware can proliferate."

"The solution takes up too much CPU and memory."

"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by making the customer aware of the benefits of the solution which would increase the adoption. Additionally, if there were features to suit multi-cloud environments it would be helpful. If the solution can intelligently identify which is important data for the organization and should not be released from the organization without authorization would be a benefit."

"Technical support doesn't really offer fast response times."

"McAfee needs to clarify its rules."

"The interface can be improved, it's too cluttered."

"We need to do a lot of configuration."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention cons

"The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved."

"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."

"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."

"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."

"There are mostly performance issues."

"Pricing is expensive."

"The configuration for Palo Alto Networks firewalls requires specifying many details, such as protocols and services."

"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"The price of the solution could improve."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"The price is high for this type of product."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."

"The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

"Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."

"The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."

"It's expensive."

"The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The product’s pricing could be cheaper.

See all answers

What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data suc...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks' pricing can be complex. Their catalog is extensive. They have a licensing model based on credits for virtual machine firewalls or containers, which simplifies the process, while...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved. Simplifying the initial setup procedure could also be beneficial as it currently requ...

See all answers

Comparisons

HP Wolf Security vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 81% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 3% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 2% of the time

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 40% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 35% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Cyberhaven vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 8% of the time

Digital Guardian vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 6% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

May 2025

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report

Download McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

June 2025

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data

No data available

Overview

McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

McAfee

Cloud-Delivered Data Protection: The industry’s first cloud-delivered Enterprise DLP that consistently protects sensitive data across all networks, clouds and users.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Kleberg Bank

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

June 2025

Free Report: McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.