Matillion ETL vs SAP Process Orchestration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Matillion Logo
3,350 views|2,263 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
SAP Logo
3,771 views|1,590 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Matillion ETL and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Matillion ETL vs. SAP Process Orchestration Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has good integrations with Amazon Redshift and other AWS services.""The product's initial setup phase was easy.""It has improved the costs of managing my customer’s data.""The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is its ease of use. If you have had some experience with other solutions, such as Snowflake, the use of this solution will be simple.""It has helped us to get onto the cloud quickly.""The technical support treats us well. They already have a support portal, and they are responsive, which helps.""Matillion ETL has great Git integration that is perfect and convenient to use.""Matillion ETL helps manage data movement, ingestion, and transformation through pipelines."

More Matillion ETL Pros →

"The initial setup was straightforward.""It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business.""The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity.""t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution.""SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary.""The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration.""The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution.""The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros →

Cons
"While the UI is good, it could be improved in its efficiency and made easier to use.""In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases.""To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful.""It can have multi-environment support. We should be able to deploy it in different environments. Its integration with SAP connection is not so nice, which should be improved. It can also support an on-prem database.""The current version is a bit more limited because it's on a virtual machine, and everything executes on that one virtual machine.""There are certain functions that are available in other ETL tools which are still not present in Matillion ETL. It would be good to have more features.""The tool's lineage is very weak.""Performance can be improved for efficiency, and it can be made faster."

More Matillion ETL Cons →

"The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.""The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved.""The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life.""We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters.""The older version of the solution will no longer be supported.""SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously.""It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way.""It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I have heard from my manager and other higher ups, "This product is cheaper than other things on the market," and they have done the research."
  • "It is cost-effective. Based on our use case, it's efficient and cheap. It saves a lot of money and our upfront costs are less."
  • "The prices needs to be lower."
  • "It was very easy to purchase through the AWS Marketplace, but it was also expensive."
  • "Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace is pretty convenient. There is a little bit of back and forth in terms of the licensing based on the machine size, but it seems to have worked out well. it is convenient to have it all as part of our AWS billing."
  • "It is not necessarily a cheap solution. However, it's reasonable priced, especially with the smaller machines that we run it on."
  • "The AWS pricing and licensing are a cost-effective solution for data integration needs."
  • "It was procured through the AWS Marketplace because it keeps things simple. They offer retail-like checkout and bill through your existing Amazon Web Services account."
  • More Matillion ETL Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."
  • "The pricing for this solution is fine."
  • "There are fees in addition to the licensing."
  • "It's not an expensive solution."
  • "Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."
  • "The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."
  • "The price of SAP Process Orchestration was reasonable."
  • "The fee for maintenance is costly."
  • More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is an incredibly user-friendly and intuitive tool, making the learning curve quite smooth
    Top Answer:We pay $5.40 per EC2 running hour, and we can reduce costs by stopping and starting the EC2 instances strategically. For instance, in our production environment, we run it for sixteen hours a day… more »
    Top Answer:There's room for improvement in how it handles data streaming capabilities. Our main challenge currently is that Matillion runs on an EC2 instance, limiting us to running only two processes… more »
    Top Answer: It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.
    Top Answer:We subscribe to annual licenses, and the competitive license cost is reasonable. We find that the cost is even more affordable compared to other options available in the market.
    Top Answer:Implementing changes and introducing new interfaces in Process Orchestration should have been more straightforward. The current system is burdened with a heavy load and has become overly complex… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    3,350
    Comparisons
    2,263
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    701
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    3,771
    Comparisons
    1,590
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Matillion ETL for Redshift, Matillion ETL for Snowflake, Matillion ETL for BigQuery
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
    Learn More
    Overview

    Matillion ETL is a powerful tool for extracting, transforming, and loading large amounts of data from various sources into cloud data warehouses like Snowflake. Its ability to load data dynamically and efficiently using metadata is a standout feature, as is its open-source ETL with good performance and high efficiency. 

    The solution has a graphical interface for jobs, is easily adjustable and extensible, and allows for scheduling and error reporting. Matillion ETL has helped organizations move to a cloud-based solution, bridge the gap between on-premises and on-cloud, and perform complex migration projects.

    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
    Sample Customers
    Thrive Market, MarketBot, PWC, Axtria, Field Nation, GE, Superdry, Quantcast, Lightbox, EDF Energy, Finn Air, IPRO, Twist, Penn National Gaming Inc
    Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company33%
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company30%
    Wholesaler/Distributor17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise35%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Matillion ETL vs. SAP Process Orchestration
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Matillion ETL vs. SAP Process Orchestration and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Matillion ETL is rated 8.6, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator. See our Matillion ETL vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.