No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamViewer ONE
Ranking in Patch Management
19th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (22nd), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 3.8%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus3.8%
TeamViewer ONE1.0%
Other95.2%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

ManojNair2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Centralized patching has unified multi‑OS management and delivers detailed security reporting
Based on my experience, a better function would be to address the problem that the product only scans a machine once a day. It has a central scanning activity that scans every laptop for changes in assets, meaning both hardware and software, as well as installed software for patches. However, this activity works only once per day and does not work on local time. If you are a global organization with the UK office and a colleague in the US, for example, and you set the task at 11:00 AM UK time, that translates to 6:00 AM in the US East Coast. If that colleague's laptop is on, the task completes; otherwise, it fails. This represents a major drawback because the task does not run on the local time of the system. Regarding the ability to create multiple tasks, you cannot create them, which is another significant issue. Only one task exists for these two activities. That one task performs both the hardware and software scanning for any changes and also conducts a patch scan. Both activities occur through the same task, but the problem is that if you have a global user base, this becomes a bottleneck.
Nitesh Ranjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to deploy patches seamlessly is the solution's most valuable aspect, as it allows us to not only deploy patches but to monitor the deployment, eases the process of patch deployment, lets us easily know what patches are available, helps us manage our patch cycles properly to know which systems require a reboot, and even handles patching for third-party applications like Apache Server and SQL Server so it's not just OS packages but application packages as well, making it very robust."
"The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is reasonable."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"For anybody researching this type of solution, if you need one product for Windows, Mac, and Linux, then this is the best choice."
"The tool's most valuable feature is performance."
"The solution's technical support is top-notch. Whenever I have a question, they get back to me immediately, which is probably one of the best features of the solution's technical support."
"At this point, this product satisfies our requirements."
"The initial setup was easy."
"The most recent enhancements are quite remarkable."
"Almost all the features are valuable to me, like the scalable feature and its highly interactive software."
"The stability seems to be pretty good so far."
"We are able to connect to clients who are currently not connected to the VPN, and we are also able to do direct file transfers between the technician and the client."
"Even if I've had three computers connected it has been fairly stable."
"The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple."
"There are some great features."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use, and using this solution enables us to get support easily."
 

Cons

"Patching over the Internet should be improved."
"The commercial aspect of ManageEngine is challenging due to their lack of presence in Brazil, which makes obtaining proposals difficult."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus needs to improve speed."
"The ability to do out of network patching needs to be added to the solution."
"With the integration with the SIEM solution, there are some glitches, and if we need to integrate with multiple vulnerability management systems, it does not provide such support."
"There are limitations to this solution when we are working with iOS, Apple laptops or desktops such as the Mac and iMac."
"The only area for improvement in ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, which I noticed, is the reporting."
"The agent can be a bit more intelligent."
"I prefer to use AnyDesk. I actually uninstalled TeamViewer."
"Using the solution’s remote connection causes some lagging issues."
"If you have one version, like if you have version 14, and the client has version 15, you can't access his computer. If the client is on 14 and the technician is on 15, he can't access the end user who's at home. So there's a disparity in versioning."
"The solution is a little expensive."
"It could be more secure."
"In the last 12 months we actually made a decision to go away from TeamViewer. Part of it has to do with the fact that TeamViewer is very expensive."
"The solution is a bit expensive. It could be cheaper."
"If there were a way for users to do access reporting, that would be an ideal addition to the product."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of this product is reasonable."
"Patch Manager is cost-effective."
"I rate the product price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"The solution cost is around $5,000 per year."
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and the charge for support is extra."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a little bit cheaper."
"Its price needs improvement."
"The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is on the moderate side."
"Users need to pay a yearly license for TeamViewer Remote Management."
"It is a licensed product."
"The solution's license is expensive."
"Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."
"Addition services could be lower priced."
"There are no charges to be paid for the solution since I use it for personal use."
"I have used the free version of the solution."
"My company uses the free version of TeamViewer Remote Management."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is pretty reasonable. Currently, I am paying around three dollars per agent per month.
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Based on my experience, a better function would be to address the problem that the product only scans a machine once a day. It has a central scanning activity that scans every laptop for changes in...
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus was the first solution on the cloud six years ago when I started using this product. Although other competitors existed in the market, they were either behind in ter...
What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?
Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...
What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to...
What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?
I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.
 

Also Known As

No data available
TeamViewer IoT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
Carey Paul Honda
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.