No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Patch Manager ...
Ranking in Patch Management
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamViewer ONE
Ranking in Patch Management
19th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (22nd), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Patch Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is 3.8%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Patch Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus3.8%
TeamViewer ONE1.0%
Other95.2%
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

ManojNair2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Centralized patching has unified multi‑OS management and delivers detailed security reporting
Based on my experience, a better function would be to address the problem that the product only scans a machine once a day. It has a central scanning activity that scans every laptop for changes in assets, meaning both hardware and software, as well as installed software for patches. However, this activity works only once per day and does not work on local time. If you are a global organization with the UK office and a colleague in the US, for example, and you set the task at 11:00 AM UK time, that translates to 6:00 AM in the US East Coast. If that colleague's laptop is on, the task completes; otherwise, it fails. This represents a major drawback because the task does not run on the local time of the system. Regarding the ability to create multiple tasks, you cannot create them, which is another significant issue. Only one task exists for these two activities. That one task performs both the hardware and software scanning for any changes and also conducts a patch scan. Both activities occur through the same task, but the problem is that if you have a global user base, this becomes a bottleneck.
Nitesh Ranjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It does not restart unexpectedly, allowing automation anytime, even during weekends."
"The automated patch deployment feature is really helpful. I can schedule it anytime, even on weekends, without needing to restart systems. The centralized management and unified console are great. It shows me which PCs are out of date or which users are breaching our policies. I can test patches before deploying them."
"The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is reasonable."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is lightweight and has a remote push feature that helps me manage several main sites and subsites."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus covers almost all my end devices, and I can easily look over my device's hardware status."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is centralized management."
"The ability to deploy patches seamlessly is the solution's most valuable aspect. It allows us to not only deploy patches but to monitor the deployment of those patches."
"The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management is very simple."
"We did call technical support once and they were very helpful and responsive."
"What I like about TeamViewer Remote Management is the chat feature on the dashboard, which is very useful. The solution also has a meeting feature, but I don't use that. The remote feature and other features of TeamViewer Remote Management also work fine, so it's a good solution."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management was very simple."
"It's considered a trusted application."
"It is great for remote support; it works well, we can transfer files, or we can share the system with more than one person at the same time, it is easy to set up, the solution is stable and secure, and we haven't had an issue with the pricing."
"The remote access is most valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the remote management capabilities."
 

Cons

"I think ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus could improve its testing capabilities. If they could test different SQL versions and server versions in their sandbox, it would be better. For example, it didn't work well with Server 2012, but it works fine with 2016 and up."
"There are limitations to this solution when we are working with iOS, Apple laptops or desktops such as the Mac and iMac."
"There is one area that confuses me and can use a lot of improvement in ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus."
"The only area for improvement in ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, which I noticed, is the reporting."
"I find the user interface a little bit intimidating and not very appealing."
"With the integration with the SIEM solution, there are some glitches, and if we need to integrate with multiple vulnerability management systems, it does not provide such support."
"The solution should have a customer label where we can label those servers or include those servers for specific customers."
"The solution's UI is an area that requires improvement."
"The connectivity could improve."
"Using the solution’s remote connection causes some lagging issues."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The main issue with the solution is the stability problem arising from network issues."
"When a user is engaged in a chat on a system with a remote user present, copying the chat content isn't easy."
"Integration with other tools would be great. That would always be a bonus."
"I want TeamViewer Remote Management to incorporate more integrations."
"The licensing model is restrictive. Even if you have a license, it's hard to use it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price needs improvement."
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and the charge for support is extra."
"I rate the price of the product a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The solution cost is around $5,000 per year."
"ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is a little bit cheaper."
"Patch Manager is cost-effective."
"The pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is on the moderate side."
"I rate the product price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"I have used the free version of the solution."
"Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."
"Users need to pay a yearly license for TeamViewer Remote Management."
"It is a licensed product."
"My company needs to pay towards the solution's annual licensing subscription costs. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard license fees of the product."
"There are no charges to be paid for the solution since I use it for personal use."
"Our licenses for TeamViewer Remote Management are being managed directly by our procurement team. If we need more licenses they handle it."
"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Healthcare Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise3
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Pricing for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is pretty reasonable. Currently, I am paying around three dollars per agent per month.
What needs improvement with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
Based on my experience, a better function would be to address the problem that the product only scans a machine once a day. It has a central scanning activity that scans every laptop for changes in...
What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus?
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus was the first solution on the cloud six years ago when I started using this product. Although other competitors existed in the market, they were either behind in ter...
What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?
Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...
What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to...
What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?
I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.
 

Also Known As

No data available
TeamViewer IoT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IKEA Honda UNICEF The University of Georgia Evander
Carey Paul Honda
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.