ManageEngine OpManager vs Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] comparison

ManageEngine and Tenable are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Additionally, 81% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine OpManager

Read 52 ManageEngine OpManager reviews

2,800 Views
2,632 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Read 4 Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

ManageEngine OpManager

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine OpManager

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (9th)

Tenable SecurityCenter Cont...

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Charles A

Deputy Director at Access Healthcare Services Pvt Ltd

Reporting features improve operational efficiency while weekend support needs enhancement

Support is moderate and needs improvement, especially during weekends when technicians perform upgrades. During weekends, they need to provide more support to ensure a smooth transition. There is a call for ManageEngine OpManager to scale better in automation and AI functionality. Although the product stability is good, support enhancement is necessary to enable better planning for upgrades and maintenance activities.

Read full review

SATYAVRAT MISHRA

AVP - Corporate IT at Godrej

A stable security solution with a useful visibility feature

We use it to scan all of our servers and network devices on a monthly basis. Then based on the outcome, we do the patching depending on high availability, and so on Through porting, we can see how the improvement is happening over a period of time. We can see the overall scenario from the last…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Some of the most valuable features are the accessibility of the solution and the fact that it is simpler than other products. For example, discovering devices in the network is very simple, making it user-friendly."

"The integration with the firewall monitoring, the security monitoring, is great."

"I am satisfied with ManageEngine OpManager's monitoring features."

"We don't have to keep an eye on it; it has a good automation option, which keeps us informed. It gives very less false positives. Overall, a really great product."

"The uptime and monitoring are valuable to us because we need to monitor the uptime of our services, the memory, and the CPUs."

"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."

"I like being able to push configurations to multiple devices. If you have the same configurations for all the branches, it's easier to use ManageEngine OpManager and push configurations at once rather than individually pushing them to each device."

"Some of the useful features are NetFlow and analytics."

More ManageEngine OpManager pros

"The scanning itself is really the core of the tool, and it's what we're most interested in."

"The first of the valuable features is how easy it is to access all of the information that's gathered from the assessments... With a lot of other technologies, like Rapid7, if you're using Nexpose you effectively have to be a DBA to get some of the lower-level results from the scans. And Qualys wasn't very intuitive."

"Through porting, we can see how the improvement is happening over a period of time. We can see the overall scenario from the last year, where were we were and where we currently stand."

"The next big one is supportability. In a large enterprise, we have many types of technologies. The technology we previously had didn't even support authentication to a lot of those technologies."

"We can manage everything with only a single console on the Tenable SecurityCenter. We can pull and define the policy. We can perform every task on the Tenable SecurityCenter."

Cons

"WMI and SNMP integration with the domain controller should be seamless"

"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."

"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."

"The two views into the system are very good but could be extended to further customization to fit the need of end users in a variety of roles."

"For the implementation part, I am facing issues when configuring the business view."

"The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now."

"The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs."

"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."

More ManageEngine OpManager cons

"In terms of what could be improved, some customers have a problem with SecurityCenter's ticket system. If I want them to assign one of the issues, they may want to assign someone to it or to assign it somewhere else and I may want to break up the ticket."

"There are certain circumstances where they may have found a vulnerable service and they just removed the service completely from the device because nobody was using it. There's no way to go into SecurityCenter and mark it, to say, "This is no longer an issue. It doesn't exist anymore." Or, "The risk was accepted for one year, so let's not report it as 'high' until that one year period is done." The handling of operational flow around vulnerability management could be improved."

"One area which is missing is cloud security because there are a lot of configurations. Rapid7 has a product called a DV cloud. I would like to have a similar kind of solution and feature."

"When it comes to... dynamic application scanning, I think they are lagging behind the curve. They have a lackluster solution, to the point where I think they need to determine, as a company, whether or not that's a space they even want to play in."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not worth the money."

"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance."

"We had perpetual licenses. The cost was around 36,000 for OPManager, and then you'd have the yearly maintenance fee of 2,000 or 3,000."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis and the pricing is on the cheaper side."

"The price of ManageEngine OpManager is reasonable. We have an annual license and the cost comes from how many devices are being monitored. There is not anything extra cost for maintenance and support."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The solution is highly affordable"

"The price for ManageEngine OpManager is average."

More ManageEngine OpManager pricing and cost advice

"Pricing-wise, it's fine. It's not an expensive product. That's not an issue."

"We did a three-year deal where the cost is amortized over the three years. The Elite Support was an additional cost to the standard licensing fees... If you use Security Center, most of the time it is on-premise, so you're going to have some sort of infrastructure to build out and there's going to be a cost associated with that."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ManageEngine OpManager?

The product provides intensive reports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine OpManager?

The pricing was okay. However, it has been increasing a lot lately. The product is not worth the money.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine OpManager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SolarWinds NPM vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 22% of the time

Zabbix vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 16% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 13% of the time

Nagios XI vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ManageEngine OpManager

Compared 7% of the time

More ManageEngine OpManager Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine OpManager

June 2025

Download ManageEngine OpManager product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL]

June 2025

Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] report

Download Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View [EOL] product report

Also Known As

OpManager

SecurityCenter Continuous View, SecurityCenter CV

Overview

ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation.

ManageEngine

SecurityCenter Continuous View is the market-leading continuous network monitoring platform. It integrates SecurityCenter along with multiple Nessus Network Monitor sensors and Log Correlation Engine (LCE) to provide comprehensive continuous network monitoring.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC

Methodist Healthcare Ministries

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

July 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Auvik, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.