We performed a comparison between ManageEngine IT360 and Meraki Dashboard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."
"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."
"The technical support is good."
"We've been spending a lot less time on tickets and deployments, so we have more time to do other things."
"Meraki Dashboard does not require a lot of maintenance. Cisco tells communicates through the Meraki Dashboard web client, it will automatically send updates to the equipment. They will send you an email on what day the updates will take place. If you want to proceed, you can click on accept, or you can decline them and schedule the updates at another time."
"Scalability is one of Meraki Dashboard's strongest features. We have thousands of users if we're counting the end-users on our clients' network, but we have hundreds of clients."
"An excellent dashboard that is currently unique in covering both SD-WAN and SD-LAN with built-in security."
"Meraki Dashboard centralizes control of all our equipment into one cloud-based console, so we can manage it from anywhere. We can resolve problems remotely outside of business hours because it is on the cloud. You can use the dashboard to change security settings or configure routers and switches."
"I would say the ease of use is the most valuable feature. It's very easy to set up and get up and running."
"The most valuable feature is the single pane of glass that gives you multisite visibility."
"There are some whitelist blacklist capabilities in the MX dashboard, which is very helpful."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."
"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."
"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."
"The initial setup is complex and can be made more straightforward."
"You can't really clone or replicate a device, that sort of feature would be useful. You can clone the site but you cannot clone the device."
"We would like to be able to test the health of WAN connections."
"It would be nicer if the dashboard was lighter."
"The one issue that we have had is that the VPN tunnel would go down unless you worked out with the ISP that you would be using a static IP address on the WAN interface."
"Meraki Dashboard could improve integration with non-Cisco platforms."
"The tool needs to incorporate more integration platforms. Integrating technical support features directly into the dashboard would be highly beneficial. This would allow technicians to troubleshoot issues more efficiently."
"There needs to be more improvement on the device-connected interface."
Earn 20 points
ManageEngine IT360 is ranked 89th in Network Monitoring Software while Meraki Dashboard is ranked 9th in Network Monitoring Software with 51 reviews. ManageEngine IT360 is rated 8.4, while Meraki Dashboard is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine IT360 writes "Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Meraki Dashboard writes "Incredibly easy to use, great troubleshooting and prevention of malicious events". ManageEngine IT360 is most compared with StackPath Monitoring and eG Enterprise, whereas Meraki Dashboard is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds NPM, ThousandEyes, Mist AI and Cloud and Zabbix. See our ManageEngine IT360 vs. Meraki Dashboard report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.