We performed a comparison between Loom and Microsoft Teams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Slack and others in Enterprise Social Software."The ability to scale videos is a valuable feature of the product."
"The conversation capabilities and document management are the solution's most valuable features."
"We didn't face any problems with the product's scalability. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to collaborate."
"The feature I like most in Microsoft Teams is the ability to work on the same file with other people, for example, on Microsoft PowerPoint, or Microsoft Excel, without needing to share the file via email."
"It allows us to invite members to attend the meeting efficiently."
"You can ping, chat, and call someone, and at the same time, on the next tab, you can see all the documents related to what someone is referring to."
"The solution's most valuable feature is connecting calls to concerned people anytime. It works much faster."
"The solution must allow users to record videos for a longer time."
"The mobile application needs improvement. There are a lot of features on the web and desktop versions that aren't implemented yet on mobile."
"The solution needs to integrate ChatGPT so that the solution can summarize the meetings. The solution needs integration with AI. Copilot is already in the pipeline."
"The way we test the audio devices must be improved."
"The UI can be further improved upon. When I used to use Skype, Skype was a small window that opened on your desktop. With Teams, when you use it, it occupies your full screen just like if you were in Word or Excel. Skype worked more like an app, which I preferred. I liked being able to use it in a minimized screen. If Teams could emulate that a bit, it would be a better user experience."
"The product needs to improve its stability."
"There could be performance spikes and better reliability. We saw a lot of stability issues."
"What I'd like to improve in Microsoft Teams are the calendar management and task management tools, because they're not easy to use. They're not user-friendly."
"Lacking in more complex hierarchies for files and teams."
Loom is ranked 13th in Enterprise Social Software with 1 review while Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews. Loom is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Loom writes "An easy-to-deploy solution that allows users to record videos seamlessly for presentation and collaboration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". Loom is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Chatter and Huddle.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
