Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Loom vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Loom
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
18th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Enterprise Social Software
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
169
Ranking in other categories
Virtual Meetings (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Enterprise Social Software category, the mindshare of Loom is 1.3%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 12.5%, down from 15.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Social Software
 

Featured Reviews

Gerald Chioke - PeerSpot reviewer
An easy-to-deploy solution that allows users to record videos seamlessly for presentation and collaboration
I use Loom to record my screen for issues and bugs. I can also record my voice The product has helped me to present the recording of my work. I can easily record my screen and show what I did. It is like a walk-through of the work I do. The solution allows me to do it seamlessly. The ability to…
Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce ( /vendors/salesforce ), which is currently limited.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The ability to scale videos is a valuable feature of the product."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that it is integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem."
"The solution's most valuable feature is connecting calls to concerned people anytime. It works much faster."
"I like the tool's screen share feature."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that it is easy to use."
"The tool is available on cell phones. It can be used in calls and meetings."
"I like the whiteboard feature as well. I'm able to scribble some stuff if I need to explain a couple of items."
"It is a stable solution."
"Setting up Teams was not difficult."
 

Cons

"The solution must allow users to record videos for a longer time."
"It would be better if Microsoft Teams can link us to the internet on the screen sharing mode during the meeting."
"To Do tasks’ ease of use should be improved."
"They could enhance the product's stability and integration features."
"What I'd like to improve in Microsoft Teams are the calendar management and task management tools, because they're not easy to use. They're not user-friendly."
"The solution's login process could be more straightforward."
"There could be performance spikes and better reliability. We saw a lot of stability issues."
"The way we test the audio devices must be improved."
"We occasionally have issues with synchronization between different dates. This aspect of stability needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its pricing."
"The solution's cost is high."
"It is moderately expensive than other Microsoft products."
"If you have content that requires more security and you want to use it in a more secure manner, with more protection, then it will come at a higher cost."
"Microsoft Teams is priced less than other solutions, such as Bridge."
"It is affordable because it also includes the licenses on Microsoft Word, Microsoft Office and SharePoint."
"Microsoft Teams is expensive compared to other solutions."
"Microsoft Teams' pricing is fine."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Social Software solutions are best for your needs.
864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Computer Software Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Loom?
The ability to scale videos is a valuable feature of the product.
What needs improvement with Loom?
The solution must allow users to record videos for a longer time. I cannot use the product on my phone. The product must provide a mobile version of the product. Sometimes, when we record, it takes...
What is your primary use case for Loom?
I use Loom to record my screen for issues and bugs. I can also record my voice.
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
I have no information about the cost as these are subsidized when procured by companies. Getting a home version cheaper or free would be a better option so students or college-goers can utilize the...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
I am unable to determine which features of Microsoft Teams are the most valuable because we do not have full capabilities due to our Exchange server being on-premise and OneDrive not being authoriz...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

hubspot, airtable, grubhub
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Slack, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Social Software. Updated: July 2025.
864,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.