Loom Systems vs ManageEngine Site24x7 comparison

ServiceNow and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ServiceNow is ranked #61, while ManageEngine is ranked #48 with an average rating of 8.0. ServiceNow holds a 0.5% mindshare in IM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of ServiceNow users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Loom Systems

Read 4 Loom Systems reviews

897 Views
718 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Site24x7

Read 2 ManageEngine Site24x7 reviews

1,099 Views
648 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Loom Systems

ManageEngine Site24x7

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Loom Systems and ManageEngine Site24x7 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Loom Systems

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

61st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anomaly Detection Tools (5th)

ManageEngine Site24x7

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

48th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (59th), Server Monitoring (21st), Cloud Monitoring Software (35th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Loom Systems is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Site24x7 is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ManageEngine Site24x7	0.5%
Loom Systems	0.5%
Other	99.0%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Keerthi Kumar Sangaraju

Technology Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Stable, easy to set up, flexible, and has multiple functionalities, but needs to define priority levels for each incident

What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority.

Read full review

Prashanth Magadi

Principal Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Struggled with complex licensing and limited support but have gained unified cloud monitoring

We face certain challenges with monitoring website uptime for our business operations because we don't have that 24/7 monitoring, so that's what we are working with ManageEngine on, regarding how effectively we can use that. I may not be able to give that information on how ManageEngine Site24x7 can be improved, but I felt that the monitoring or the licensing terms, such as the advanced monitors or monitors, are not very user-friendly. I feel that because I don't know how exactly we can check what devices use which license and how we can control those things; that's not user-friendly. For example, if I have to look at what all devices are utilizing my advanced monitor license or what all devices are using my basic monitor license, then if I want to pull a report or validate them, I don't have an easy option; it's too complicated.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring and that it's a flexible solution."

"The RFS portion of the solution is the product's most valuable feature."

"You can develop your own apps within Loom, and they can be configured very simply."

"The solution is absolutely scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out they definitely can."

"What I like best about Loom Systems is that you can use it for infrastructure monitoring. I also like that it's a flexible solution."

"The solution is very scalable; a company wouldn't have any issues expanding it if they needed to, and we have a few thousand users on the solution."

"The solution is absolutely scalable."

"Bringing Loom in ensures that the incident process, request process, change, all of these processes are improved."

"Site24x7 stands out. It is truly amazing."

"The deployment was not a challenge for us, because we are just trying to connect to the cloud instance; it's SaaS-based, so we just had to route all our traffic to that particular device."

"One of the valuable features of this site is that it operates 24/7, monitoring my entire infrastructure, uptime, and related error issues."

Cons

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident."

"What's lacking in Loom Systems is the level of priority for each incident. For example, after implementation and there was a huge impact on the client, and the client comes back to you and says that there's an incident, that there needs to be an immediate resolution for it, you'll see severity one, severity two, etc., in Loom Systems, rather than priority levels. It would be better if the incidents can be defined as low priority, medium priority, or high priority."

"The change management within the solution needs to be improved. There needs to be more process automation."

"The reporting is a bit weak. They should work to improve this aspect of the product."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy, especially in the initial setup which can take six months of work, especially when you have a large estate that you're dealing with."

"The reporting is a bit weak."

"The discovery and mapping still takes a lot of human intervention, it's quite resource heavy,"

"The product is not difficult to use. That said, it is technical. The engineer must be familiar with it."

"The only complaint I would state about the technical support by ManageEngine is we don't get them on call; it's only email support that we get."

"It is technical. The engineer must be familiar with it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

22%

University

13%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Site24x7?

This tool can handle 40 basic monitors. I can set the pole and frequency from 130 locations, configuring the IPs to provide three advanced monitors.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Site24x7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Site24x7?

The primary use case is for the monitoring of our critical resources. We have probably not fully utilized the product, as we are still using the basic functionality of monitoring our servers and a ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Loom Systems

Compared 19% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Loom Systems

Compared 13% of the time

DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs Loom Systems

Compared 13% of the time

OpsRamp vs Loom Systems

Compared 13% of the time

BigPanda vs Loom Systems

Compared 11% of the time

More Loom Systems Competitors

Kentik vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 19% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 12% of the time

Netdata vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 10% of the time

eG Enterprise vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 7% of the time

New Relic vs ManageEngine Site24x7

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Site24x7 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Loom Systems product report

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

March 2026

Download ManageEngine Site24x7 product report

Overview

Loom Systems delivers an advanced AI-powered operational analytics platform to predict and prevent problems in the digital business. DevOps & IT teams use Loom for real-time detection and resolution for any type of application, including home-grown. Loom analyzes logs and metrics in all formats, performs smart correlations and root cause analysis to help organizations gain immediate into their environments. Loom stands alone in the industry as an AI platform requiring no prior math knowledge from its operators, leveraging your existing staff to succeed in the digital era. Getting started is easy - zero configuration and data pre-processing needed, so you can stream your data in its raw format.

ServiceNow

ManageEngine Site24x7 is a comprehensive monitoring platform that aids businesses in tracking application and website performance, network activity, and server health, ensuring seamless IT operations.

Known for delivering deep insights, ManageEngine Site24x7 provides businesses with the tools necessary to maintain robust digital infrastructure. It supports monitoring of application performance, uptime, server health, and network traffic. Its cloud-based solution is suitable for IT departments seeking continuous visibility and control over their digital assets. Offering detailed analytics, it enhances decision-making by rapidly identifying potential issues before they affect business operations.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Site24x7?

Application Performance Monitoring: Tracks and optimizes application services for improved functionality.
Website Monitoring: Monitors uptime and response time to ensure web presence is uninterrupted.
Network Monitoring: Provides insights into network traffic and performance for comprehensive oversight.
Server Monitoring: Analyzes server status and resource consumption, promoting optimal performance.
Cloud Monitoring: Supports multiple cloud providers, offering a unified view of cloud services.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from ManageEngine Site24x7?

Improved Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring to reduce downtime and enhance productivity.
Cost Savings: Detects issues early to minimize repair costs and resource wastage.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides thorough insights into IT infrastructure for proactive management.
Scalability: Adapts to dynamic IT environments, making it suitable for growing businesses.

ManageEngine Site24x7 is implemented across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. It provides solutions tailored to specific needs, ensuring critical IT systems perform reliably. Organizations benefit from its ability to monitor and report on industry-specific applications and regulatory compliance requirements.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Citrix, Amdocs, Sysaid, Hexaware, Effibar, Revtrak, Taptica

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.