LogicMonitor vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE comparison

LogicMonitor and Nutanix are both solutions in the Container Monitoring category. LogicMonitor is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nutanix is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.4. LogicMonitor holds a 2.2% mindshare in DCM, compared to Nutanix’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogicMonitor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

LogicMonitor

Read 26 LogicMonitor reviews

458 Views
5 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Read 12 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE reviews

59 Views
7 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogicMonitor

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

LogicMonitor and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are competitive in the IT monitoring and Kubernetes deployment sectors respectively, with each possessing strengths tailored to specific operational needs. Based on the comparison, LogicMonitor holds an edge in feature flexibility and user support, while NKE is more cost-effective for cluster setup.

Features: LogicMonitor offers robust dashboards providing real-time data access, enhancing troubleshooting and performance optimization. Its customizable logic modules enable significant flexibility and detailed alert tuning, ideal for diverse monitoring needs. NKE simplifies cluster setup with user-friendly features designed for swift deployments, making it accessible for those with limited Kubernetes experience. Additionally, NKE emphasizes efficient management of Kubernetes clusters, streamlining operational tasks.

Room for Improvement: LogicMonitor could improve parent/child device mapping and refine its reporting interface to enhance graphical data presentation. It would benefit from simplified monitor customization and improved alert integration. NKE, meanwhile, might enhance management capabilities and the user interface to ease advanced replication and recovery tasks. Improving support for complex Kubernetes functions and comprehensive documentation updates would be advantageous for NKE users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogicMonitor allows for flexible deployment across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments, accompanied by commendable technical support. This flexibility gives it an advantage in diverse IT settings. NKE is primarily on-premises and integrates seamlessly within the Nutanix ecosystem, supported by reliable customer service. LogicMonitor's compatibility across environments and real-time chat support provide distinct operational benefits, complementing NKE's ease of integration in Nutanix setups.

Pricing and ROI: LogicMonitor, as a premium solution, is justified by its comprehensive features and robust ROI by minimizing false alerts and operational time. Although costly for larger deployments, its value is recognized for its functionality. NKE is competitively priced within the Nutanix suite, offering cost-efficient Kubernetes deployment without additional fees. LogicMonitor reduces costs significantly over alternatives like Prognosis, while NKE's integration with existing infrastructure represents a more economical Kubernetes solution.

To learn more, read our detailed LogicMonitor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogicMonitor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogicMonitor

Ranking in Container Monitoring

7th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (26th), Network Monitoring Software (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (22nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (18th), AIOps (12th)

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Ranking in Container Monitoring

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Container Management (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Container Monitoring category, the mindshare of LogicMonitor is 2.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Manish Bansod

Assistant Manager at a construction company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A feature-packed solution with excellent stability and a notification system

LogicMonitor has good features, but the ease of use is a little bit confusing. Additionally, we are looking for workflow automation, which is a little bit tricky for LogicMonitor. But we are still exploring more and do not have detailed training in LogicMonitor. Moreover, the deployment process needs improvement. The thing is the deployment or whatever the standard deployment should be implemented here. That is not fine-tuning. In my personal opinion, for workflow automation and other stuff, we have Python or scripting knowledge, and that part is very tricky. Whenever we try to call the service or the LogicMonitor team, and we open a ticket, it is chargeable. In future releases, we would like to see a configuration backup manager. A feature that automatically backups the device configuration will help us. So, instead of going with another third-party tool, this will be good.

Read full review

Prasanthraj PN

Sales Director at InnovationTQ

Offers efficient deployment and management with easy resource allocation, yet faces challenges in integration and compatibility

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE ( /products/nutanix-kubernetes-engine-nke-reviews ) offers easy and fast deployment, management, stability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. The resource allocation is very simple. If we need to expand the memory, storage space, or processor core, it is very easy to manage through our central control. These features are what stand out the most.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution’s overall reporting capabilities are pretty powerful compared to ones that I have used previously. It seems like it has a lot of customizations that you can put in, but some of the out-of-the-box reports are useful too, like user logon duration and website latency. Those type of things have been helpful and don't require a lot of, if any, changes to get useful content out of them. They have also been pretty easy to implement and use."

"The most valuable feature is the visualization of the data that it is collecting. I have used many products in the past and they tend to roll up the data. So, if you're looking at data over long periods of time, they start averaging the data, which can skew the figures that you're looking at. With LogicMonitor, they have the raw data there for two years, if you are an enterprise customer. If you are looking at that long duration of data, you're seeing exactly what happened during that time."

"The initial setup is very simple."

"Having a full team at LogicMonitor for support is super helpful as they are available all the time to answer any questions you may have."

"LogicMonitor saves time in terms of its ability to proxy a connection through a device. For example, if you are troubleshooting a device, which you may want to connect to, you can proxy this connection through the platform. As a support resource, I don't need to use multiple platforms to connect to a device to further investigate the issue. It is all consolidated. From that perspective, it saves time because a resource now only needs to use one platform."

"It has improved our organization with its capacity planning. We have a performance environment that we use to benchmark our applications. We use it to say, "Okay, at a certain level of concurrency, we know where our application will fall over." Therefore, we are using LogicMonitor dashboards to tell us that we're good. Our platform can handle X number of clients concurrently hitting us at a time."

"LogicMonitor is good for getting a full view of your topologies. They have LiveMaps, which give you a visual representation of your infrastructure."

"The breadth of its ability to monitor all our environments, putting it in one place, has been helpful. This way, we don't have to manage multiple tools and try to juggle multiple balls to keep our environment monitored. It presents a clear picture to us of what is going on."

More LogicMonitor pros

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."

"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."

"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."

"The solution is easy to manage. You can get everything in a single platform. It is also easy to work with Terraform as a code."

"The solution is embedded in the hypervisor and there are no deployment costs."

"The technical support is excellent."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE pros

Cons

"The dashboards can be improved. They are good, but there is a pain point. To show things to management, to explain pain points to other customers, to show them exactly where we can do better, the dashboarding could be better. Dashboards need to show the key things. Nobody is going to go into the ample details of Excel sheets or HTML."

"LogicMonitor has good features, but the ease of use is a little bit confusing. Additionally, we are looking for workflow automation, which is a little bit tricky for LogicMonitor."

"Role-based permissions could be better and updating modules could be smoother."

"Some more application performance type monitoring would be nice. For example, an APM type solution, which would not necessarily completely replace it, but be able to tie into to what we're seeing on the application performance side so we can correlate what's going on with the application versus the underlying infrastructure."

"The topology mapping is all based on the dynamic discovery of devices that could talk to each other. There is no real manual way that you can set up a join between two devices to say, "This is how this network is actually set up." For example, if you have a device, and you're only pinning that device and not getting any real intelligent information from it, then it can't appear on the map with other devices. Or if it can appear, then it won't show you which devices are actually joined to it."

"One drawback of LogicMonitor is its licensing model, which requires an additional license for each module. For example, if you need to use Azure monitoring, you'll need an additional license on top of the base license."

"One thing that could be really better is the mapping. Auvik is really good at it. They have a really nice way to give you a visual representation of your network, but in LogicMonitor, this functionality is not as powerful and as good as Auvik."

"LogicMonitor should always improve AI because we are always striving for real intelligence. An additional feature we'd like to see in the next release of LogicMonitor is more in the area of identification of when the dominant workload is working. There are certain devices and applications that have cycles of their own. Some are used primarily during prime time, and some are used during the overnight timeframe, and better identification and classification of those workloads would be helpful. For example, we could then do some more planning about, for this particular set of devices, as it has a prime time environment, and we don't want to see a 24-hour average, as we want to see what is the 75th or 90th percentile utilization during the prime time when it is being used, whenever that prime time is."

More LogicMonitor cons

"Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging due to compatibility issues."

"I have issues with the product's interoperability."

"There have been challenges related to software bugs, especially regarding long-term licensing options and issues within our customer network."

"The product lacks some virtualization capabilities, making it an area for improvement where the solution can focus on providing users with more virtualization capabilities related to disk systems."

"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."

"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."

"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."

"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The features were very valuable to us because we could consolidate them into one platform and have a good user experience with the platform, our accounts, and the support team. That was the key driver for us. That was what we were looking for. We looked for a comprehensive solution that could provide advanced features all in one platform, and LogicMonitor was the solution that we chose. It definitely has a premium price. However, you are getting what you pay for in a very effective way. That was important in our decision-making.The features were very valuable to us because we could consolidate them into one platform and have a good user experience with the platform, our accounts, and the support team. That was the key driver for us. That was what we were looking for. We looked for a comprehensive solution that could provide advanced features all in one platform, and LogicMonitor was the solution that we chose. It definitely has a premium price. However, you are getting what you pay for in a very effective way. That was important in our decision-making."

"It is pretty expensive, but we now need one less full-time engineer. With on-prem, we used to have one more engineer in our department. That engineer has now moved to another department. Our capacity is better with this product than the previous one. It is easy for us to manage the sites. You have to choose between the standard account and the premium account. With the premium account, you get a lot more than the standard one, and you can also buy some extra features. It is a good thing to look at them because you would probably want to buy them. You should take your time and negotiate the price. They are easy. Like all cloud providers, they are able to discuss the price and if necessary, change the price."

"The solution is not expensive."

"It definitely pays for itself in the amount of time we're not spending with false errors or things that we haven't quite dealt with monitoring. It has been good cost-wise."

"The pricing can be a little aggressive. Right now, it's a bit much for smaller organizations to adopt it. But comparatively, it also provides good features."

"The licensing side of things with LogicMonitor, is quite simple. It is one license per device. Recently, you have additional licenses with things, like LM Cloud, which does confuse things a bit. Because it's very hard to estimate how many licenses you're going to need until you're monitoring it, so it's quite hard through that process to give a customer price to say, "This is how much this services will cost.""

"The tool's pricing falls into the middle range."

"LogicMonitor is competitively priced at the same level as other vendors, like Datadog."

More LogicMonitor pricing and cost advice

"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."

"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."

"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

What do you like most about LogicMonitor?

LogicMonitor helps us prevent potential downtime. It's pretty good. It generates low-level warnings that aren't necessarily preemptive but can still alert us to issues we should investigate. These ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogicMonitor?

The pricing can vary yearly or monthly, depending on the clients we're working with and their size and scale. For example, the pricing for a customer with ten thousand licenses versus a hundred lic...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging du...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?

We are using Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE ( /products/nutanix-kubernetes-engine-nke-reviews ) in our organization. It is implemented on Cisco M7 ( /products/oracle-supercluster-reviews ) Series ( ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs LogicMonitor

Compared 8% of the time

OpsRamp vs LogicMonitor

Compared 8% of the time

SCOM vs LogicMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LogicMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

ScienceLogic vs LogicMonitor

Compared 6% of the time

More LogicMonitor Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 36% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 21% of the time

Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 12% of the time

Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 10% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Compared 6% of the time

More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogicMonitor

June 2025

Download LogicMonitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

June 2025

Download Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nutanix Karbon

Overview

LogicMonitor provides infrastructure and network monitoring, alerting, and reporting across environments like AWS, Azure, and on-premises.

LogicMonitor aids businesses and managed service providers in maintaining system health, performance, and availability. It supports various technologies including Citrix, Cisco Voice systems, operating systems, virtual machines, and network devices. Businesses benefit from dashboards and data insights for proactive management, customizable data sources, and integration with third-party applications like Slack or ServiceNow. AI technology enhances monitoring capabilities by recognizing normal behavior and updating monitored elements, while multiple monitoring features consolidate data sources into one interface.

What are LogicMonitor's key features?

Dashboards: Instant, interactive access to data for easy monitoring.
Customizable Data Sources: Robust, adaptable monitoring with logic modules.
Granular Alert Tuning: Enhances issue identification and resolution.
Reporting Capabilities: Detailed oversight and forecasting.
Third-Party Integration: Expands functionality with applications like Slack and ServiceNow.
AI Technology: Recognizes normal behavior and updates monitored elements.
Consolidated Monitoring: Combines diverse data sources into a single interface.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

System Health: Ensures optimal system performance and availability.
Data Insights: Facilitates proactive management with comprehensive data.
Scalability: Adapts to different environments and technologies.
Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring with a single, efficient interface.
Predictive Analysis: Provides detailed oversight and accurate forecasting.

LogicMonitor is utilized across diverse industries by managed service providers to ensure seamless monitoring and management of clients' systems. This includes application performance monitoring, manual topology mapping, SLA calculations, and improvement of role-based permissions. Companies also seek enhanced resources view, better collector upgrade processes, and streamlined customization for monitoring from the repository.

LogicMonitor

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) is an enterprise Kubernetes management solution that simplifies provisioning, operations, and lifecycle management of Kubernetes.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

Kayak, Zendesk, Ted Baker, Trulia, Sophos, iVision, TekLinks, Siemens

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen

Buyer's Guide

LogicMonitor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

June 2025

Free Report: LogicMonitor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE

Find out what your peers are saying about LogicMonitor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogicMonitor vs. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE report.

See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.