Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

LifeSize vs Microsoft Teams comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

LifeSize
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
36th
Average Rating
5.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft Teams
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
166
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Social Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of LifeSize is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Teams is 3.3%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1320285 - PeerSpot reviewer
Good video conferencing but it needs to support third-party hardware
We are using Lifesize for video conferencing and virtual meetings The most valuable feature is video conferencing. This solution needs better platform integration with third-parties such as Microsoft and Cisco. It needs support for third-party hardware as opposed to only Lifesize-branded…
Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless presentation and collaboration enhance organizational productivity
There are three main areas for improvement: Firstly, AI capabilities should be integrated into Microsoft Teams to provide better transcript services and offer multiple language support. Secondly, it should allow participants to remain visible during presentations, enhancing interaction. Lastly, it needs broader integration capabilities with other products, like Salesforce ( /vendors/salesforce ), which is currently limited.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature is video conferencing."
"This is a stable solution, I have not faced any problems using the video conferencing."
"It is a stable solution."
"The product is more convenient than taking a plane to Australia. Going to Australia can take around two days. The tool is much quicker. The video conferencing feature has improved our productivity."
"I think it is stable when I use it for meetings with my customers...The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is easy."
"It is simple to schedule meetings in Teams. There are also plugins available from the Microsoft store that can be integrated with the solution. You can edit documents in the tool itself."
"We didn't face any problems with the product's scalability. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup process is straightforward for technical executives."
"We use Microsoft Teams for group communications."
 

Cons

"This solution needs better platform integration with third-parties such as Microsoft and Cisco."
"The product's performance has certain shortcomings that require improvement."
"The solution needs to improve the APIs."
"The future scalability can include the integration of planners, project management tools, SharePoint, and more applications that are used."
"The solution's feature for scheduling meetings could be faster for Android phones. It should work okay like its desktop version."
"In the next release, I would like to have the interface modernized and brought more up to date."
"The tool lacks AI. We will require AI in the solution to be able to integrate with all other tools."
"They should add an integration API for the solution."
"The whiteboarding area in the tool has certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Microsoft Teams’s pricing is low."
"The solution's pricing is fair enough and not expensive. Teams' licensing costs are yearly. However, Zoom is less expensive."
"If you have clients who do not have a computer and are joining with their phones it's an additional fee of $5.00 per user."
"It is a bit more than moderately expensive."
"We need to pay for Microsoft Teams' licenses on a yearly basis."
"We get the solution on a corporate plan, where everything is included."
"The product is expensive, and I rate its pricing a ten out of ten."
"I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its pricing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
41%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Microsoft Teams?
The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams comes with Office 365 ( /products/office-365-reviews ) licenses like E3, but there are options for those who prefer not to pay for Teams by using alternative products like Slack ( /...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Teams?
The biggest issue with Microsoft Teams is switching identities, especially when communicating with external organizations. Users often don't know they have messages from another company unless they...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

LifeSize
MS Teams
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Barrow County School System, ActiVision, BBVA, BWB, Bateman, eBay, Epson, Gevers, FannieMae, GlaxoSmithKline, Jones & Walker, KKR, RAF Museum Cosford
Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: June 2025.
859,579 professionals have used our research since 2012.