OpenText UFT Developer and LambdaTest are key competitors in the software testing tools market, with OpenText UFT Developer having an edge due to its extensive features and customization, whereas LambdaTest excels with its geolocation testing and cloud-based solutions.
Features: OpenText UFT Developer offers support for complex algorithms, integration with various development environments, and high customization, making it ideal for developers using familiar IDEs. It supports numerous technologies such as Java and .NET. Conversely, LambdaTest stands out with geolocation testing and extensive browser support, offering cloud-based solutions that integrate with CI/CD tools like Jenkins and GitLab, making it highly effective for testing diverse OS and browser combinations.
Room for Improvement: OpenText UFT Developer could enhance stability and performance, and improve integration with modern technologies like IoT and ALM. Its Windows dependency and reliance on Visual Basic for scripting are notable drawbacks. LambdaTest users suggest improvements in mobile app testing and real device availability, citing current simulation limitations. Enhanced analytics and support for a broader range of testing scenarios are also desired enhancements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT Developer primarily relies on on-premises deployment, which can restrict flexibility but offers control and customization for enterprises. Customer service feedback is mixed, with some users experiencing delays and inadequate support. LambdaTest, with its public cloud deployment, offers easier setup and flexible environments. It generally receives positive support feedback, though quicker response times could improve user experience.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT Developer is considered costly, with licensing fees reaching up to $10,000 per user license, making it more suitable for large organizations seeking high ROI when used by multiple users. LambdaTest is more affordable, with plans starting at $19 per month, seen as cost-effective for smaller businesses. Its free tier allows users to test before committing financially, providing a budget-friendly alternative to pricier solutions.
LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).
**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.
**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).
**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
