No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

KODAK Info Input Solution vs Nanonets comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere
Sponsored
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
642
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (2nd), Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (2nd), Process Mining (1st), Agentic Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (2nd), AI Legal & Compliance (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (1st), AI Procurement & Supply Chain (1st)
KODAK Info Input Solution
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nanonets
Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Automation Anywhere is 3.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of KODAK Info Input Solution is 1.2%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nanonets is 1.7%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Automation Anywhere3.4%
KODAK Info Input Solution1.2%
Nanonets1.7%
Other93.7%
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)
 

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash - PeerSpot reviewer
Management Consultant at Accenture
Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions
Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.
DA
Information Technology Manager at Benchmac Safety Services Ugand
Automated document extraction has reduced manual paperwork and improves inspection accuracy
One area of KODAK Info Input Solution that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future is support, especially sales support. Technical support is adequate. For example, when we were negotiating about the pricing of the solution, the sales support was interested more in us buying the plan, but they were not explaining what the benefits of this solution are or how it is going to help us. The focus was specifically on buying the plan, which I saw was not good. Another thing is about the interface. The interface should be improved. It looks a little bit outdated compared to other modern SaaS platforms. If they can improve on the UI and interface, that would be helpful. To be honest, what we purchased KODAK Info Input Solution for is executing our plan. I don't think I'm not aware about that. Maybe other features should be included, but the features we currently have in KODAK Info Input Solution help execute our plan. If they can improve on analytics, that would be great. The AI summary can tell you what you have, but analytics are not adequate. As I mentioned before, we have to export our data to another third-party tool, Tableau, to analyze our data.
AK
Senior Rga Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Automation has transformed complex sales order tables into accurate data for our ERP
I have observed that while training Nanonets, we must provide a larger number of examples or documents. When I trained the model, it usually requested around 50 documents as a dataset to train the model. I found this very difficult because business users are not very helpful in providing such a large number of documents; we usually have around two, three, or five. It would be helpful if we could start training the model with limited datasets and then have an option to always improve the model by providing more datasets as we progress through the journey, but it should not be a blocker at the first stage where you need to provide at least 50 samples for a model to train.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In Automation Anywhere we liked the drag-and-drop and easily stitching the recording of mouse control and keyboard controls."
"Automation Anywhere has impacted our efficiency and productivity in a very positive way since we are shutting down a very manual process."
"It can be easily learned by anyone who spends a bit of time with it."
"In particular, with our requirements, we have seen reduced dependency on the workforce and we had proper execution of our business process."
"It frees individuals up from mundane tasks so they can concentrate on being more active and creative other things that they need to do."
"It's very easy for business users to learn Automation Anywhere."
"It is a great solution."
"The solution has removed humans making errors while increasing our time savings, and we now have a lot more efficiencies in our process."
"The most valuable feature of KODAK Info Input Solution is the open intelligence piece, the ability to consume five different OCR engines."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution collects data automatically, which saves time, unlike when someone has to enter data manually."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution's customer support is the best."
"I rate KODAK Info Input Solution a ten out of ten."
"The return on investment with KODAK Info Input Solution is excellent because it has helped us so much and, although we pay $4,800 annually, in return it saves a lot of our time."
"What makes KODAK Info Input Solution perfect is that it has comprehensive capabilities, features, and tools including its own printers and scanners that can easily connect and share information."
"By using KODAK Info Input Solution, we can scan the document, which automatically enters all details, allowing us to avoid mistakes in this way."
"I find the pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution to be friendly and affordable because before implementing the software in our company, our system manager discussed it with us and we found the pricing to be reasonable, which is why we recommended it."
"The best features Nanonets offers include their workflow and OCR detection capabilities, which have positively impacted my organization by helping detect edge cases in OCR that require some post-processing or pre-processing and have improved efficiency and reduced errors."
"Nanonets has positively impacted my organization by providing a solution that works for us as developers."
 

Cons

"Had we had access to the RPA bots in advance, we would have practiced before fully implementing."
"Automation Anywhere could enhance its services by establishing a local office in our region to provide better support."
"Another feature that would be cool to see in Automation Anywhere is more use of artificial intelligence. Right now, RPA is basically limited to a bot which is simply following the instructions that it was given. However, what would be really useful is if a bot was able to more flexibly respond to issues. For example, sometimes there are erroneous errors and pop ups. With good code, you can certainly build your bots to be able to handle that. However, it does take time and a bit of technical know-how to be able to do that."
"The initial cost of Automation Anywhere, including license fees and integration costs, is high. It is challenging for business users to operationalize the tool independently."
"There should be more available Data Analytics and more AI Front and Deep Learn concepts."
"It should be easier to use."
"I could personally use automated testing, which we currently do not have in Automation Anywhere."
"The website can be buggy at times, and I would like to see improvements in latency and slow response times."
"Integrating KODAK Info Input Solution with other software, such as Laserfiche, presents challenges due to inadequate documentation and an unintuitive web services interface."
"The main challenge concerns the mobile application."
"The only area I think KODAK Info Input Solution could improve on is making their user interface more user-friendly and offering full customer customization of features."
"Sometimes there is an accuracy problem with KODAK Info Input Solution. Sometimes while connecting to the database, it shows errors, such as SQL login failed, your port is blocked, or not reachable."
"One area of KODAK Info Input Solution that I would like to see improved or enhanced in the future is support, especially sales support."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution can improve its connection with scanners. It connects most effectively with Kodak's own scanners, specifically the S S S SMAX Scanners, while connections with other brands, such as Epson or HP, can take more time."
"The most significant area for improvement in the KODAK Info Input Solution is its ability to support custom definitions and auto-learn."
"I think Nanonets can be improved as the pricing seems to be a bit high, which is one of the things they should improve."
"I have observed that while training Nanonets, we must provide a larger number of examples or documents."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing costs range from $50,000 to $200,000."
"Automation Anywhere is cheaper than UiPath and Blue Prism. From a market point of view, Automation Anywhere is reasonable. Any organization can adopt Automation Anywhere."
"I think the pricing is reasonable, but clients often perceive it as expensive."
"It is expensive. Automation Anywhere has reduced the price slightly, as we have grown. However, the price is still excessive enough that we are engaged in PoCs on other tools."
"The price of this product is good."
"Approximately, for a developer, it is around $750 for a license a year. For Bot Runners, it is about $550."
"Cost is the biggest area in need of improvement for Automation Anywhere. Annually it's $250,000. That's what deterred us right away."
"We purchase on a bot basis. Our costs are approximately $5,000."
"Although KODAK Info Input Solution's pricing is competitive within the industry's consumption-based model, its approach is overly complex."
"The pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution in Mexico is very expensive, and the government's purchasing process requires convincing many stakeholders."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Construction Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
7%
Media Company
26%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business154
Midsize Enterprise82
Large Enterprise536
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...
How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?
It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KODAK Info Input Solution?
I find the pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution to be friendly and affordable because before implementing the softwar...
What needs improvement with KODAK Info Input Solution?
Sometimes there is an accuracy problem with KODAK Info Input Solution. When the document is not scanned properly, the...
What is your primary use case for KODAK Info Input Solution?
I will use KODAK Info Input Solution in our college for admissions processing. When many people come for admissions, ...
What needs improvement with Nanonets?
I have observed that while training Nanonets, we must provide a larger number of examples or documents. When I traine...
What is your primary use case for Nanonets?
Nanonets is primarily used for table extraction from native and scanned PDFs. I have implemented Nanonets for sales o...
What advice do you have for others considering Nanonets?
I cannot speak to the exact cost, but I can say Nanonets saved around six hours per day for a business user for a sin...
 

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)
No data available
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics
Information Not Available
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Automation Anywhere, UiPath, ABBYY and others in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP). Updated: May 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.