Klocwork and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are prominent solutions in static code analysis. Klocwork offers enhanced integration with development environments, while OpenText excels in language support and feature breadth.
Features: Klocwork offers efficient integration with CI systems, customizable checker creation, and a low false-positive rate for higher software quality. OpenText supports a wide range of languages and provides centralized security management, making it ideal for diverse environments.
Room for Improvement: Klocwork should improve detection of global variables, extend language support, and provide more flexible licensing. OpenText could reduce false positives, streamline configuration, and add more frequent updates and language support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork allows on-premises and private cloud deployments with robust global support, while OpenText offers on-premises and hybrid cloud options, recognized for good customer service, though documentation could improve.
Pricing and ROI: Klocwork is competitively priced with flexible licensing, yielding good ROI through defect reduction. OpenText, despite higher costs, is valued for feature richness and comprehensive security, offering satisfactory ROI especially in regulated environments.
The main ROI factors include efficiency and how we meet compliance standards for various automotive requirements.
The issue is not about the knowledge of the support but about the prioritization of the tickets they handle.
The customer support team is very responsive, proactive, and engages in conversations to ensure our needs are met.
During the initial phase when I did interact with the vendor, the support was satisfactory.
The technical support has been good because we always received answers to our questions.
The customer service and support for Fortify Static Code Analyzer are better than those for LoadRunner.
Klocwork supports our scalability needs without issues, even as project volumes increase.
The program-to-program enablement is scalable.
Fortify Static Code Analyzer integrates well and is scalable.
Installation is easy, and the solution is stable.
The stability of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is generally good.
I would rate the product stability as an eight.
We would like Klocwork to connect to Git and notify developers of issues tied to specific commits.
Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage.
There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them.
We are not ready to transfer our code without control to AI instruments.
It would be really helpful to include trending vulnerabilities and how to manage them.
It should be easier to install, perhaps through a container-based approach where everything is combined into one image or pack of containers.
It is less expensive than Coverity.
Klocwork was competitively priced, making it a cost-effective solution for us.
Klocwork's pricing seems attractive, as it uses a per-user license model that does not have a lot of overhead.
The pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is good, with a flexible model that allows customers to choose a setup that suits their needs.
My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good.
The most valuable feature of Klocwork is the static analysis tools, which help identify potential security threats and errors.
Its integration with the CI/CD pipeline has helped streamline the software development process.
It takes just half a day to set up.
Fortify Static Code Analyzer has the capability of giving fewer false positives compared to other tools.
The most impactful feature of Fortify Static Code Analyzer in identifying vulnerabilities is the ratio of total number of vulnerabilities to false positives.
The most valuable feature of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is its extensive language support, covering many languages from legacy ones to the newest.
Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.
OpenText Static Application Security Testing empowers teams with efficient vulnerability detection and streamlined secure coding practices, offering comprehensive language support and seamless integration with development tools.
OpenText Static Application Security Testing enhances software security during development by accurately identifying vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. It integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, making it highly efficient for early detection of security issues. Users benefit from its easy setup, clear documentation, and centralized portal for managing security findings. Despite facing challenges like high costs and complex configurations for certain languages, its role in facilitating compliance and streamlining secure coding processes is indispensable. Improvements are needed in areas such as outdated design, language support, and integration capabilities to meet evolving user expectations.
What features does OpenText Static Application Security Testing offer?Organizations across diverse sectors implement OpenText Static Application Security Testing primarily to secure applications during development phases. Its integration with tools like GitLab, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps ensures a robust security pipeline. By combining with Sonatype Nexus, secure code, and library management is achieved effectively.
We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.