KerioConnect vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection comparison

KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Download the complete report

Helped 892,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KerioConnect

Ranking in Email Archiving

7th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Applications (9th)

Mimecast Email and Collabor...

Ranking in Email Archiving

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (17th), Office 365 Protection (2nd), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Email Archiving category, the mindshare of KerioConnect is 2.6%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection is 16.7%, down from 24.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Archiving Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection	16.7%
KerioConnect	2.6%
Other	80.7%

Email Archiving

Featured Reviews

Marcelino Mongcal

Senior Systems Tech/Admin at Samco Software Inc.

A seamless setup ensures smooth communication with comprehensive support

We remain a partner with Sophos and use XG S Firewalls without AWS implementation. We only use Sophos endpoint and Sophos Central. We host some clients on-premise while others we host remotely. The VPN connection is easy and proprietary, so it's not open to any other VPN clients. Communication with other mail servers is seamless. It can communicate with Gmail and Outlook without issues, provided the DNS settings are correct. We monitor our servers and security logs, implementing GeoIP blocking. We frequently block China and India IPs due to brute force attacks on our servers. We have extensive experience with KerioConnect. Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly. On a scale of 1-10, this solution rates an 8.

Read full review

Test Logix

Email Security Engineer at Logic Infosecurity

Experience high detection and user-friendly policies with reliable email security implementation

The system is not user-friendly because you have to create policies that are mapped in a dictionary. As an IT engineer, I understand how it works, but explaining it to another IT person can be difficult. Having more user-friendly dashboards would improve the work experience. In Mimecast Email Security, checking policies in the dictionary or gateway is very complicated, and not everyone understands this process. If you examine the Check Point portal, it's user-friendly with easily accessible tabs that anyone can explore. With Mimecast Email Security, making changes might impact existing mailboxes. The portal is complicated compared to Check Point's user-friendly interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface. It has many security features able to be controlled from one place, such as anti-spam. I have found it very convenient. Additionally, you can analyze log files and share folders which is helpful."

"The user interface is good."

"It's relatively simple to use."

"KerioConnect has integration with 365. We can use Outlook, which has its client and can be used with Apple devices. It integrates with the App Store and Microsoft Office. It has a smart router. The spam filtering and antivirus are good."

"Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly."

"As long as the operating is stable, the Kerio connect will be very stable as well, so we don't have any problem with it."

"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface."

"We use the solution as a mail server. It connects with Outlook and is used for calendaring and similar tasks."

More KerioConnect pros

"Mimecast is a brilliant product; it works very well, I have very seldomly, if ever, had any problems with it, and it does exactly what it promises to do."

"What I like about the integration is that it is directly into Microsoft 365, users can use their Microsoft 365 credentials to log into the portal and access their mail."

"In terms of technical superiority and the product itself, there are no complaints."

"Email security is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"It's good, it keeps the spam out."

"The initial setup is very straightforward."

"URL inspection works pretty well."

"My advice to those considering this product would be to go for it."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection pros

Cons

"I don't particularly like this solution. I would not recommend this solution to others."

"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason."

"KerioConnect is stable as long as you use a strong password."

"It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case."

"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."

"I would like to see better support from their support team."

"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow."

"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware."

More KerioConnect cons

"Their support should be improved. They are notorious for sending you to knowledge-based articles rather than actually talking to you, but that is, unfortunately, kind of becoming a trend with everything. In terms of features, I haven't had any complaints. However, I don't like the fact they moved to a paid training subscription model. They used to have a lot of free webinars for training, but they have started to charge for them in the past year."

"The feature that should be included is to remove the block on the encrypted files."

"The differentiation between bulk spam mail and campaign-related mail could be improved."

"As for areas for improvement within Mimecast Web Security, I believe there is quite a lot that can be improved."

"The price could be better, it should be reduced."

"We have subscribed to an archival service, and yet, when we have to get our data out, we have to pay a fee to get our own data."

"The solution is very expensive."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."

"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."

"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."

"The licensing costs are per-user for the product that you get with them."

"The solution is expensive."

"It's an expensive solution."

"The product price is moderate. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"Its price is in the middle range. It is a structured licensing model where there are various components that you can add or choose to add or not."

"Two subscription options are currently offered: monthly and yearly. My suggestion is to opt for the yearly subscription as it can give some discount. The pricing isn't high as other cloud solutions are pricier than Microsoft's offerings."

"The product has good pricing in terms of return on investment."

"For what it is, the product is overpriced."

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KerioConnect?

The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?

The pricing is very easy to understand. As a partner, we have a monitoring system that informs us when subscriptions expire, allowing us to handle renewals. The pricing is very competitive.

What needs improvement with KerioConnect?

Since KerioConnect is a setup and go solution, everything works on its own. The only administrative tasks required are keeping it up to date, monitoring security logs, and ensuring protection from ...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

Do you know anything about the pricing and cost of the Mimecast Email Security?

What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be worthwhile. Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competi...

What is your primary use case for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

I have been working with Mimecast Email Security.

Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect

Comparisons

Compared 26% of the time

Zimbra Collaboration vs KerioConnect

Compared 15% of the time

IceWarp vs KerioConnect

Compared 11% of the time

Open-Xchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 8% of the time

Barracuda Message Archiver vs KerioConnect

Compared 3% of the time

More KerioConnect Competitors

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 18% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 9% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 6% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection Competitors

Product Reports

KerioConnect

Download KerioConnect product report

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Download Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection product report

Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection report

Also Known As

No data available

Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, Mimecast Web Security, Mimecast Mailbox Continuity, Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Overview

KerioConnect delivers easy-to-use and secure email, calendar, and collaboration tools compatible with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync. Cost-effective and flexible, it suits on-premise installations, especially for SMBs seeking privacy and security.

KerioConnect offers a comprehensive email server experience with minimal resource needs and effective spam filtering. Compatible across platforms, it supports Outlook, enabling organizations to manage corporate communications efficiently. Its ability to host multiple domains makes it suitable for sectors like warehouse distribution and retail, with installation options that enhance security and privacy. However, faster Outlook integration, improved MS Teams and CRM system integration, and AI functionalities are sought after by users. Some demand a cloud version, Linux support, and better documentation. Still, KerioConnect remains a reliable choice for those needing on-premise capabilities.

What are KerioConnect's Key Features?

Ease of Use: Simplified interface for seamless navigation.
Robust Security: Advanced protection measures to safeguard data.
Spam Filtering: Efficiently reduces unwanted emails.
Platform Compatibility: Integrates with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync.
Log Analysis: Offers detailed insights for server management.
Multiple Domain Support: Manages diverse domains with ease.

What Benefits Should Users Expect?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs compared to alternatives.
Resource Minimization: Requires minimal system resources.
Deployment Flexibility: Allows tailored on-premise installations.
Enhanced Security: Provides privacy through internal hosting options.
Reliable Support: Access to reseller services from Sophos.

KerioConnect is widely utilized in SMBs across sectors like retail and warehouse distribution for its capability to handle multiple domains and integrate with Outlook for communication management. Resellers offer it as a dependable on-site email management solution, letting businesses maintain oversight and security control.

GFI

Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers advanced features like sandboxing, email archiving, and phishing protection. It's known for integration with Microsoft 365 and user-friendly admin management, making it a robust choice for secure communications.

Focused on safeguarding emails, Mimecast Advanced Email Security integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, providing features such as sandboxing, spam filtering, and email archiving. It delivers comprehensive protection against phishing, identity threats, and impersonation attempts. Administrators benefit from the ability to monitor external communications and customize configurations, enhancing email security. Users appreciate the intuitive admin console and responsive support team. Although it faces challenges in threat detection rates and administration complexity, its capabilities in email monitoring, spam filtering, and URL inspection remain valued by enterprises seeking reliable email security that supports compliance needs.

What key features should users explore?

Sandboxing: Analyzes attachments in a secure environment to detect threats.
Email Archiving: Provides secure long-term storage of emails for compliance.
Spam Filtering: Prevents unsolicited emails from clogging the inbox.
URL Inspection: Checks links in emails for malicious content.
Phishing Protection: Guards against deceptive tactics to protect sensitive data.

What benefits can impact ROI?

Regulatory Compliance: Facilitates adherence to standards such as HIPAA.
Integration: Enhances existing systems with seamless Microsoft 365 integration.
Support: Offers a responsive support team to resolve issues promptly.
Email Security: Improves threat prevention with effective spam and phishing protections.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security is implemented across industries to protect against email threats like phishing, spam, and malicious attachments. It serves as both a gateway and an archiving tool, supporting compliance in healthcare and finance by offering features like URL protection and data loss prevention. Enterprises leverage its capabilities to secure inbound and outbound communications effectively.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery

Azizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group

KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection