KerioConnect vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

GFI and Mimecast are both solutions in the Email Archiving category. GFI is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0, while Mimecast is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5. GFI holds a 3.3% mindshare in EA, compared to Mimecast’s 13.6% mindshare. Additionally, 62% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Mimecast users who would recommend it.

KerioConnect

Read 11 KerioConnect reviews

2,176 Views
457 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Read 44 Mimecast Advanced Email Security reviews

10,030 Views
1,805 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

KerioConnect

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

KerioConnect and Mimecast Advanced Email Security compete in the email security domain. While KerioConnect stands out for its affordability and customer support, Mimecast Advanced Email Security has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and superior threat intelligence.

Features: KerioConnect provides integrated email, calendaring, and contacts for small and medium-sized businesses. It supports ActiveSync, has excellent spam and antivirus filtering, and allows log file analysis and shared folders. Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers comprehensive threat protection, advanced filtering, and email continuity. Its features include threat remediation, URL protection, and secure messaging.

Room for Improvement: KerioConnect could enhance scalability and offer more cloud-based features. Optimization of its mobile interface and extension of third-party app integration could improve user experience. Mimecast Advanced Email Security might simplify deployment, streamline its complex features, and enhance platform integration. Reducing the learning curve for new users would benefit user adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KerioConnect offers a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service, providing a hassle-free setup. Mimecast Advanced Email Security, more complex to deploy due to its extensive features, excels in customer service and support documentation, offering a detailed support infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: KerioConnect has a lower initial setup cost, making it attractive for budget-conscious businesses and providing a quick ROI. Mimecast Advanced Email Security, although more expensive, justifies the investment with long-term security benefits crucial for larger organizations requiring comprehensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,436 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KerioConnect

Ranking in Email Archiving

7th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Applications (8th)

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Ranking in Email Archiving

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (4th), Office 365 Protection (2nd), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Email Archiving category, the mindshare of KerioConnect is 3.3%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Advanced Email Security is 13.6%, down from 22.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Archiving Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Advanced Email Security	13.6%
KerioConnect	3.3%
Other	83.1%

Email Archiving

Featured Reviews

Marcelino Mongcal

Senior Systems Tech/Admin at Samco Software Inc.

A seamless setup ensures smooth communication with comprehensive support

We remain a partner with Sophos and use XG S Firewalls without AWS implementation. We only use Sophos endpoint and Sophos Central. We host some clients on-premise while others we host remotely. The VPN connection is easy and proprietary, so it's not open to any other VPN clients. Communication with other mail servers is seamless. It can communicate with Gmail and Outlook without issues, provided the DNS settings are correct. We monitor our servers and security logs, implementing GeoIP blocking. We frequently block China and India IPs due to brute force attacks on our servers. We have extensive experience with KerioConnect. Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly. On a scale of 1-10, this solution rates an 8.

Read full review

Avinash Mishra

Manager - EUC at Finthrive

Advanced email filtering has blocked massive spam volumes and prevents unauthorized data leaks

Improvements for Mimecast Advanced Email Security include enhancing the user interface and accessibility, particularly regarding admin capabilities to add or modify user accounts. Streamlining this could improve overall usability and security management for users. Reporting is another area needing improvement in Mimecast Advanced Email Security, as the reports provided are not very easy to decipher. With artificial intelligence being integrated into various tools including Mimecast Advanced Email Security, I believe there is potential to enhance functionality, enabling users to ask specific questions and retrieve concise answers instead of overwhelming data. I choose a nine for Mimecast Advanced Email Security because improvements such as better user interface and artificial intelligence integration features would greatly enhance its usability. While no tool is perfect, these adjustments could greatly elevate Mimecast Advanced Email Security's capabilities.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is our SMB alternative to Exchange, installed for more than forty SMB customers in a Linux environment with all of the collaboration features."

"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."

"As long as the operating is stable, the Kerio connect will be very stable as well, so we don't have any problem with it."

"The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic."

"The solution is easy to maintain, unlike Exchange. It's easy to create multiple domains and back up and restore if needed. It also has good security features like anti-spam and antivirus."

"The user interface is good."

"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface."

"We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance."

More KerioConnect pros

"The security on offer is very good."

"We like Mimecast's spam filtering. The email signature feature is also a big plus for our users."

"Based on overall experience, Mimecast Email Security is the best solution for traditional gateways."

"The product's most valuable features are impersonation protection and phishing countermeasures."

"The setup was easy."

"The most valuable feature is the DMARC Analyzer."

"If I had to mention one or two things that bring the biggest benefit, I would say the security of the emails and dealing with everything."

"I recommend Mimecast based on customer requirements and budget."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security pros

Cons

"KerioConnect continues to improve with regular updates throughout the year. They must be added to the roadmap, which requires approval."

"I would like to see better support from their support team."

"We cannot compete with them because they're fully integrated with their applications."

"I don't particularly like this solution. I would not recommend this solution to others."

"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."

"Having a native Outlook map integration would make Kerio Connect better."

"It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case."

"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"

More KerioConnect cons

"I don't think it's ideally suited for maybe a smaller business environment, like, for example, for companies with less than 100 seats."

"Certainly, the primary area needing improvement is Mimecast's customer support. Our experience as Mimecast customers has been less than satisfactory. Even when raising a priority ticket, the response time is unacceptably long, often taking around five to six hours. This level of service is disappointing. Additionally, there have been recurring service disruptions in the UK region, leading to extended email delays due to various service issues. This year alone, we've encountered such problems on approximately four occasions."

"The system is not user-friendly because you have to create policies that are mapped in a dictionary."

"Their support should be improved. They are notorious for sending you to knowledge-based articles rather than actually talking to you, but that is, unfortunately, kind of becoming a trend with everything. In terms of features, I haven't had any complaints. However, I don't like the fact they moved to a paid training subscription model. They used to have a lot of free webinars for training, but they have started to charge for them in the past year."

"We discussed the phishing aspect, the DNS system, and the key rotation."

"While it's quick and easy, the initial setup could be more user-friendly."

"The price could be better, it should be reduced."

"We have subscribed to an archival service, and yet, when we have to get our data out, we have to pay a fee to get our own data. They charge an extraction fee."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."

"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."

"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."

"Two subscription options are currently offered: monthly and yearly. My suggestion is to opt for the yearly subscription as it can give some discount. The pricing isn't high as other cloud solutions are pricier than Microsoft's offerings."

"Compared to the other solutions in the market, Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection's pricing is fine."

"The solution is expensive."

"Its price is in the middle range. It is a structured licensing model where there are various components that you can add or choose to add or not."

"Compared to the other products in the market, it is neither cheap but nor very expensive. I would rate it somewhere in the middle, 5 out of 10."

"For what it is, the product is overpriced."

"I'm always going to say the price needs to be lower, but it's reasonable."

"The customers can select the license packages as per their requirements."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,436 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?

The pricing is very easy to understand. As a partner, we have a monitoring system that informs us when subscriptions expire, allowing us to handle renewals. The pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioConnect?

Since KerioConnect is a setup and go solution, everything works on its own. The only administrative tasks required are keeping it up to date, monitoring security logs, and ensuring protection from ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for KerioConnect?

Small medium-sized businesses are our primary focus, particularly in warehouse distribution and retail sectors. We are a reseller and purchase directly from Sophos.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

Do you know anything about the pricing and cost of the Mimecast Email Security?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be worthwhile. Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

I have been working with Mimecast Email Security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 15% of the time

Zimbra Collaboration vs KerioConnect

Compared 11% of the time

Open-Xchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 9% of the time

IceWarp vs KerioConnect

Compared 9% of the time

Superhuman vs KerioConnect

Compared 5% of the time

More KerioConnect Competitors

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 14% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 6% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 5% of the time

Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect

August 2026

Download KerioConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Advanced Email Security

August 2026

Download Mimecast Advanced Email Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, Mimecast Web Security, Mimecast Mailbox Continuity, Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Overview

KerioConnect delivers easy-to-use and secure email, calendar, and collaboration tools compatible with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync. Cost-effective and flexible, it suits on-premise installations, especially for SMBs seeking privacy and security.

KerioConnect offers a comprehensive email server experience with minimal resource needs and effective spam filtering. Compatible across platforms, it supports Outlook, enabling organizations to manage corporate communications efficiently. Its ability to host multiple domains makes it suitable for sectors like warehouse distribution and retail, with installation options that enhance security and privacy. However, faster Outlook integration, improved MS Teams and CRM system integration, and AI functionalities are sought after by users. Some demand a cloud version, Linux support, and better documentation. Still, KerioConnect remains a reliable choice for those needing on-premise capabilities.

What are KerioConnect's Key Features?

Ease of Use: Simplified interface for seamless navigation.
Robust Security: Advanced protection measures to safeguard data.
Spam Filtering: Efficiently reduces unwanted emails.
Platform Compatibility: Integrates with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync.
Log Analysis: Offers detailed insights for server management.
Multiple Domain Support: Manages diverse domains with ease.

What Benefits Should Users Expect?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs compared to alternatives.
Resource Minimization: Requires minimal system resources.
Deployment Flexibility: Allows tailored on-premise installations.
Enhanced Security: Provides privacy through internal hosting options.
Reliable Support: Access to reseller services from Sophos.

KerioConnect is widely utilized in SMBs across sectors like retail and warehouse distribution for its capability to handle multiple domains and integrate with Outlook for communication management. Resellers offer it as a dependable on-site email management solution, letting businesses maintain oversight and security control.

GFI

Mimecast Email Security protects organizations against phishing, malware, business email compromise, and impersonation attacks, with detection built on 20 years of experience and over 1.3 billion emails inspected daily. It's available as a secure email gateway (MX-based) for full control over complex, multi-region environments, or via API integration with Microsoft 365, which deploys in hours with no MX changes. Administrators get a single console for policy management, monitoring external communications, and customizing configurations, and can pair it with Mimecast Cloud Archive for long-term email retention and compliance.

What key features should users explore?

Sandboxing: Full emulation sandboxing and AI-driven static analysis detect threats in attachments before delivery.
Spam and Phishing Protection: Multi-layered detection catches both payload-based attacks and payloadless, socially-engineered BEC attempts.
URL Inspection: Computer Vision AI analyzes destination pages to catch phishing and brand impersonation.
API Deployment Option: Deploys in hours without MX or mail flow changes, with 30-day historical scanning to show threats your current defenses missed.
Email Archiving (via Cloud Archive): Secure long-term storage supporting compliance needs.

What benefits can impact ROI?

Regulatory Compliance: Supports adherence to standards like HIPAA through retention and monitoring.
Integration: Deep integration with Microsoft 365, deployable as a gateway or via API depending on your environment.
Rapid Time to Value: API deployment proves protection value in hours, before any infrastructure commitment.
Threat Prevention: Detection engines refined daily against 1.3 billion emails, trusted by 42,000 customers globally.

Industries and use cases

Mimecast Email Security is used across industries, including healthcare and finance, to secure inbound and outbound communications and support compliance requirements. Enterprises use it as a gateway, an API-based layer on top of Microsoft 365, or both, depending on how much control versus deployment speed they need.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery

Hewlett-Packard Company (HP), Cushman and Wakefield, PIB Group, Swissport

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

August 2026

Free Report: KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Find out what your peers are saying about KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,436 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security report.

See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.

We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.