KerioConnect vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security comparison

GFI and Mimecast are both solutions in the Email Archiving category. GFI is ranked #7 with an average rating of 10.0, while Mimecast is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. GFI holds a 2.8% mindshare in EA, compared to Mimecast’s 14.5% mindshare. Additionally, 62% of GFI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Mimecast users who would recommend it.

KerioConnect

Read 11 KerioConnect reviews

2,026 Views
324 Comparison Views

62% willing to recommend

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Read 40 Mimecast Advanced Email Security reviews

8,859 Views
1,595 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

KerioConnect

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 2, 2026

KerioConnect and Mimecast Advanced Email Security compete in the email security domain. While KerioConnect stands out for its affordability and customer support, Mimecast Advanced Email Security has the upper hand due to its comprehensive features and superior threat intelligence.

Features: KerioConnect provides integrated email, calendaring, and contacts for small and medium-sized businesses. It supports ActiveSync, has excellent spam and antivirus filtering, and allows log file analysis and shared folders. Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers comprehensive threat protection, advanced filtering, and email continuity. Its features include threat remediation, URL protection, and secure messaging.

Room for Improvement: KerioConnect could enhance scalability and offer more cloud-based features. Optimization of its mobile interface and extension of third-party app integration could improve user experience. Mimecast Advanced Email Security might simplify deployment, streamline its complex features, and enhance platform integration. Reducing the learning curve for new users would benefit user adoption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: KerioConnect offers a straightforward deployment process and reliable customer service, providing a hassle-free setup. Mimecast Advanced Email Security, more complex to deploy due to its extensive features, excels in customer service and support documentation, offering a detailed support infrastructure.

Pricing and ROI: KerioConnect has a lower initial setup cost, making it attractive for budget-conscious businesses and providing a quick ROI. Mimecast Advanced Email Security, although more expensive, justifies the investment with long-term security benefits crucial for larger organizations requiring comprehensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 899,052 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KerioConnect

Ranking in Email Archiving

7th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Applications (9th)

Mimecast Advanced Email Sec...

Ranking in Email Archiving

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (15th), Office 365 Protection (2nd), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Email Archiving category, the mindshare of KerioConnect is 2.8%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Advanced Email Security is 14.5%, down from 23.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Archiving Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection	14.5%
KerioConnect	2.8%
Other	82.7%

Email Archiving

Featured Reviews

Marcelino Mongcal

Senior Systems Tech/Admin at Samco Software Inc.

A seamless setup ensures smooth communication with comprehensive support

We remain a partner with Sophos and use XG S Firewalls without AWS implementation. We only use Sophos endpoint and Sophos Central. We host some clients on-premise while others we host remotely. The VPN connection is easy and proprietary, so it's not open to any other VPN clients. Communication with other mail servers is seamless. It can communicate with Gmail and Outlook without issues, provided the DNS settings are correct. We monitor our servers and security logs, implementing GeoIP blocking. We frequently block China and India IPs due to brute force attacks on our servers. We have extensive experience with KerioConnect. Backing up and maintaining it is straightforward compared to Microsoft Exchange, making it administrator-friendly. On a scale of 1-10, this solution rates an 8.

Read full review

Ravishankar KumarPatel

Solution Architect Cybersecurity at Microland Limited

Email defenses have reduced phishing risk and support strong compliance and user awareness

The improvement needed is not necessarily in the product itself, but rather around how other organizations have evolved. The DLP discussion is no longer limited to email; it has gone to border level with companies like Zscaler, Netskope, and Palo Alto giving the complete full-stack SASE setup. When somebody has a SASE setup, then Mimecast Advanced Email Security DLP might not even be needed at a point in time. Mimecast Advanced Email Security needs to improve in this area because they are only focusing on a particular set of problems which is on email and human risk, whereas companies that need a slightly bigger picture will look elsewhere. The second thing is when you buy an XDR provider, they give you a complete holistic story around it, showing what has happened, which email somebody has clicked on, whether there have been any changes, and whether there is any network activity. You get a holistic picture. When pushing Mimecast Advanced Email Security to end customers, people are more often saying that they would rather buy XDR from another provider because the story when an analyst sees is complete in terms of what they see, whereas they only get an email story from Mimecast Advanced Email Security. Mimecast Advanced Email Security has to improve there. Companies like Abnormal AI cover more on UEBA and user behavior, and there are many things for Mimecast Advanced Email Security to improve in this area as well. It is less of a technology issue; they are doing very well on email. The conversation for them to have is on how to get into a broader level or how to get a tie-up to become a broader supplier. At least from a service provider landscape, I can say that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is good."

"This solution is our SMB alternative to Exchange, installed for more than forty SMB customers in a Linux environment with all of the collaboration features."

"Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface."

"The solution is easy to maintain, unlike Exchange. It's easy to create multiple domains and back up and restore if needed. It also has good security features like anti-spam and antivirus."

"The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud."

"KerioConnect has integration with 365. We can use Outlook, which has its client and can be used with Apple devices. It integrates with the App Store and Microsoft Office. It has a smart router. The spam filtering and antivirus are good."

"We use the solution as a mail server. It connects with Outlook and is used for calendaring and similar tasks."

"What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."

More KerioConnect pros

"We're now certain business-critical mail is perfectly protected in multiple ways."

"If you want the ease of use, then Mimecast, or at least a cloud solution, is the way to go."

"Mimecast is pretty good, even if you're on Office 365."

"The most valuable feature of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is real-time alerts."

"I would rate Mimecast Email Security a nine out of ten."

"URL inspection works pretty well."

"Its administration console is very easy to use. The administration console is absolutely important because you interact with the platform through it."

"The solution is pretty straightforward to use and easy to set up."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security pros

Cons

"You cannot integrate with other services like Google Docs, Google Assistant, Google Calendar, etc."

"I would like to see better support from their support team."

"The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger."

"The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"

"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow."

"We are considering switching to Microsoft Exchange. One reason is that it doesn't improve our workflow and doesn't integrate well with Microsoft 365 applications."

"Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason."

"It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case."

More KerioConnect cons

"Its pricing can be improved. It is a bit expensive."

"Their support should be improved. They are notorious for sending you to knowledge-based articles rather than actually talking to you about the problem you're reporting."

"I did have a problem with Mimecast. That is why I was looking for an alternative solution because their sender IP address gets poorly rated by Microsoft."

"Mimecast Advanced Email Security needs to improve in this area because they are only focusing on a particular set of problems which is on email and human risk, whereas companies that need a slightly bigger picture will look elsewhere."

"The price of the solution is expensive. It can improve by reducing the price."

"External security features need improvement."

"The price could be better, it should be reduced."

"While it's quick and easy, the initial setup could be more user-friendly."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."

"KerioConnect has a first-time cost and yearly subscription. It is not expensive."

"The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."

"The solution's pricing depends on how long you plan to keep it because you pay on a per-year basis. You might have a one-time setup cost for something like Microsoft Exchange or a Linux mail server. I'd say this solution is expensive on a per-year basis, almost 2000-3000 dollars annually. It doesn't seem to pay off yet, so we're considering switching to another product."

"The product price is moderate. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing a ten."

"Compared to the other products in the market, it is neither cheap but nor very expensive. I would rate it somewhere in the middle, 5 out of 10."

"The customers can select the license packages as per their requirements."

"The solution is expensive."

"For what it is, the product is overpriced."

"The product has good pricing in terms of return on investment."

"The price of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is expensive."

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

899,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KerioConnect?

The pricing is very easy to understand. As a partner, we have a monitoring system that informs us when subscriptions expire, allowing us to handle renewals. The pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KerioConnect?

Since KerioConnect is a setup and go solution, everything works on its own. The only administrative tasks required are keeping it up to date, monitoring security logs, and ensuring protection from ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for KerioConnect?

Small medium-sized businesses are our primary focus, particularly in warehouse distribution and retail sectors. We are a reseller and purchase directly from Sophos.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

Do you know anything about the pricing and cost of the Mimecast Email Security?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be worthwhile. Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection?

I have been working with Mimecast Email Security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Exchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 19% of the time

Zimbra Collaboration vs KerioConnect

Compared 13% of the time

IceWarp vs KerioConnect

Compared 10% of the time

Open-Xchange vs KerioConnect

Compared 9% of the time

Superhuman vs KerioConnect

Compared 5% of the time

More KerioConnect Competitors

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 17% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 8% of the time

Barracuda Email Protection vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 6% of the time

Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Compared 4% of the time

More Mimecast Advanced Email Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect

May 2026

Download KerioConnect product report

Buyer's Guide

Mimecast Advanced Email Security

May 2026

Download Mimecast Advanced Email Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

Mimecast Email Security with Targeted Threat Protection, Mimecast Web Security, Mimecast Mailbox Continuity, Email and Collaboration Threat Protection

Overview

KerioConnect delivers easy-to-use and secure email, calendar, and collaboration tools compatible with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync. Cost-effective and flexible, it suits on-premise installations, especially for SMBs seeking privacy and security.

KerioConnect offers a comprehensive email server experience with minimal resource needs and effective spam filtering. Compatible across platforms, it supports Outlook, enabling organizations to manage corporate communications efficiently. Its ability to host multiple domains makes it suitable for sectors like warehouse distribution and retail, with installation options that enhance security and privacy. However, faster Outlook integration, improved MS Teams and CRM system integration, and AI functionalities are sought after by users. Some demand a cloud version, Linux support, and better documentation. Still, KerioConnect remains a reliable choice for those needing on-premise capabilities.

What are KerioConnect's Key Features?

Ease of Use: Simplified interface for seamless navigation.
Robust Security: Advanced protection measures to safeguard data.
Spam Filtering: Efficiently reduces unwanted emails.
Platform Compatibility: Integrates with Office, Apple, and ActiveSync.
Log Analysis: Offers detailed insights for server management.
Multiple Domain Support: Manages diverse domains with ease.

What Benefits Should Users Expect?

Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs compared to alternatives.
Resource Minimization: Requires minimal system resources.
Deployment Flexibility: Allows tailored on-premise installations.
Enhanced Security: Provides privacy through internal hosting options.
Reliable Support: Access to reseller services from Sophos.

KerioConnect is widely utilized in SMBs across sectors like retail and warehouse distribution for its capability to handle multiple domains and integrate with Outlook for communication management. Resellers offer it as a dependable on-site email management solution, letting businesses maintain oversight and security control.

GFI

Mimecast Advanced Email Security offers advanced features like sandboxing, email archiving, and phishing protection. It's known for integration with Microsoft 365 and user-friendly admin management, making it a robust choice for secure communications.

Focused on safeguarding emails, Mimecast Advanced Email Security integrates seamlessly with Microsoft 365, providing features such as sandboxing, spam filtering, and email archiving. It delivers comprehensive protection against phishing, identity threats, and impersonation attempts. Administrators benefit from the ability to monitor external communications and customize configurations, enhancing email security. Users appreciate the intuitive admin console and responsive support team. Although it faces challenges in threat detection rates and administration complexity, its capabilities in email monitoring, spam filtering, and URL inspection remain valued by enterprises seeking reliable email security that supports compliance needs.

What key features should users explore?

Sandboxing: Analyzes attachments in a secure environment to detect threats.
Email Archiving: Provides secure long-term storage of emails for compliance.
Spam Filtering: Prevents unsolicited emails from clogging the inbox.
URL Inspection: Checks links in emails for malicious content.
Phishing Protection: Guards against deceptive tactics to protect sensitive data.

What benefits can impact ROI?

Regulatory Compliance: Facilitates adherence to standards such as HIPAA.
Integration: Enhances existing systems with seamless Microsoft 365 integration.
Support: Offers a responsive support team to resolve issues promptly.
Email Security: Improves threat prevention with effective spam and phishing protections.

Mimecast Advanced Email Security is implemented across industries to protect against email threats like phishing, spam, and malicious attachments. It serves as both a gateway and an archiving tool, supporting compliance in healthcare and finance by offering features like URL protection and data loss prevention. Enterprises leverage its capabilities to secure inbound and outbound communications effectively.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery

Azizi Developments, Affinity Credit Union, Aftercare, Al Abbar Group

Buyer's Guide

KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

June 2026

Free Report: KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security

Find out what your peers are saying about KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

899,052 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our KerioConnect vs. Mimecast Advanced Email Security report.

See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.

We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.