Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Keeper vs N-able Passportal comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Keeper
Ranking in Enterprise Password Managers
10th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
N-able Passportal
Ranking in Enterprise Password Managers
27th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (28th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Enterprise Password Managers category, the mindshare of Keeper is 4.0%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able Passportal is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Password Managers
 

Featured Reviews

Parwiz ElmJo - PeerSpot reviewer
It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security
We use Keeper to store passwords We previously kept our passwords in an Excel file. Using Keeper makes us more secure.  Keeper has strong security features.  The password rotation feature could be improved. I have used Keeper for three years. I rate Keeper eight out of 10 for stability.  I…
Yazan Albaw - PeerSpot reviewer
Passportal centralizes and securely manages client credentials and sensitive information, enhancing both security and efficiency.
Passportal offers the capability to automatically rotate passwords, allowing users to set customizable policies for expiration dates and password strength. You can define requirements for the number of letters, symbols, numbers, and case sensitivity, and the system will generate passwords accordingly. Policies can be updated as needed to maintain security. As a comprehensive password and information management solution, Passportal supports the addition of assets, licensing details, SSL certificates, domains, articles, and documents. When referring to adding assets, this means documenting relevant information, not monitoring them. For example, when we onboard a new engineer responsible for managing clients, we create a user profile for them in Passportal and grant access to the pertinent client information. This centralized access ensures they have all necessary details in one place, streamlining their workflow.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Available for Windows platforms and also Mac OS and Linux systems."
"I can access my passwords from any Internet connected device."
"The ability to share credentials easily and securely was a big improvement."
"The ability to autofill the login credentials has saved me a lot of time in my day to day computing."
"It is very easy to use, intuitive, and cost effective."
"I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO."
"It keeps my passwords organized and safe."
"The chat support is quick. I have never encountered any problems. On the contrary, they have been very helpful and kind."
"Passportal also helps manage assets. You can add information about your infrastructure, like routers, including model numbers, operating systems, expiration dates, and licensing."
"The most valuable feature of the N-able Passportal is its functionality. You can store your passwords safely, and not just anyone can gain access to them. If you have an onsite system, it can change the password for you on a daily basis. This is a great benefit because you don't have to worry about if the account's breached tomorrow, your pass is going to be changed. It's perfect."
"The most valuable features of the N-able Passportal are the password rotations, and the ability to be able to store passwords. You can have it on your phone or your desktop. You're not required to have it only on your desktop computer."
 

Cons

"I would love it if you didn't have to re-authenticate when you start up a new browser."
"The stability of the solution can be improved."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
"Possible offline access to passwords. Therefore, when internet access is unavailable, I can still access my vault."
"Room for improvement in my eyes would be being able to share my credit cards and other types of information. The only thing they really share is passwords, and you can only do it with one password at a time. When you're trying to share it out or trying to remove it from being shared, you can't do multiple selections."
"The password rotation feature could be improved."
"Rearranging folders via drag/drop functionality would be very helpful."
"The organization of items needs improvement. For example, when I log onto the cloud version as well, everything is shown on my folder. It is hard to differentiate between files and documents in my list of items I have stored inside."
"I'd like to see the ability to provide both credential management and documentation management for clients. Currently, they only get access to credential management."
"N-able Passportal can improve the stability because sometimes I can't log in. I had some issues a couple of months ago where I couldn't log in and that was problematic."
"Sometimes accessing the solution is a bit slow, but that could be due to conditions at many different points. However, some issues that do arise are outside of our control."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its cost is relative to the value of the information stored in Keeper."
"Pricing might be a little less, but with promo codes and family plan - best offer"
"Free works unless the paid is absolutely necessary."
"The more users, the better the price. Always opt for the live support."
"It's definitely worth it and affordable. Their sales team can definitely help scale your needs on licensing and provide pricing options."
"ROI is hard to know, but it has to be several times the expense of the product."
"Its price is reasonable."
"We chose their optional annual subscription; I believe we paid monthly — I thought it was a good deal."
"The price of N-able Passportal is approximately $15 for the license."
"For its value, Passportal's price is affordable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Password Managers solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Keeper?
I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Keeper?
The solution was more expensive than the competition, but considering our business needs, it was perfectly aligned with the price-performance aspect.
What needs improvement with Keeper?
There is no improvement needed. Everything was good, and it was perfect for my needs.
What is your primary use case for N-able Passportal?
Passportal is designed to manage and securely store passwords in the cloud using encrypted storage, addressing the vulnerabilities of storing passwords on local devices. Local storage risks exposur...
What advice do you have for others considering N-able Passportal?
For managing credentials and documents, Passportal provides a comprehensive solution that meets all our needs. I would rate it a ten out of ten. It also offers mobile access for both Android and iO...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Keeper Security
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

At&t, Wells Fargo, Disney, GM, Chase, Honeywell, Samsung, Dow
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Keeper vs. N-able Passportal and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.