No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Veritas eDiscovery Platform vs kCura Relativity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

kCura Relativity
Ranking in eDiscovery
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veritas eDiscovery Platform
Ranking in eDiscovery
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
1.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of kCura Relativity is 5.5%, up from 5.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas eDiscovery Platform is 2.5%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
kCura Relativity5.5%
Veritas eDiscovery Platform2.5%
Other92.0%
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

HR
Legal Associate at Elevate
Easy to categorize documents and offers transparent view of documents
I found Relativity very useful because it's easy to categorize documents. If you get more complex litigation, like around 500,000 or 1,000,000 documents, it's easier to categorize them in Relativity. So, it's a more powerful tool for reviewing documents. I haven't faced any problems using Relativity yet. I found it very useful.
IB
Sales Manager at Beta Information Technology
Provides solid compatibility and integration with multiple solutions while having room for improvement in marketing and promotions
I must clarify that I can only speak to pricing aspects, not technical features or functionality. I am primarily involved in the commercial and management side. I cannot make judgments about backup solutions including Veritas eDiscovery Platform, Commvault, Rubrik, or Veeam. I can only discuss list prices, not discounted prices. I have not received full promotional or marketing information about the product. My review rating for this solution is 8 out of 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like Relativity's blackout feature, as well as the Case Dynamics function."
"The searching capability of the product is definitely very valuable to our organization."
"Unquestionably, kCura Relativity is a scalable solution."
"There are a lot of ways to QC your work and save your searches, and we had really good case support from the Relativity team."
"kCura Relativity is easy to use, and it is reliable."
"It is easy for a beginner to learn to use Relativity."
"The ease of navigation from dock to dock, and that kind of usability, is quite helpful."
"The most valuable feature from my perspective are the Kepler; it's a component that is more technical and directly related to the development companies that will be using it, allowing you to create custom APIs and gather most of the information that is not available in the standard API that they offer."
"The compatibility with other solutions is a key feature; the solution can be configured and integrated with multiple solutions seamlessly."
 

Cons

"There are a lot of bugs on the development side."
"The price per user could be improved. We'd like for it to be more affordable."
"I think there is a lot of room for improvement because we have encountered a lot of bugs especially on the development side."
"They require more built-in support for some third-party applications."
"I haven't seen anything on AI merging with Relativity."
"I think RelativityOne, because it is so powerful, can be very difficult to use and there's a lot that can go wrong if you don't know how to use it."
"What I dislike about Relativity is that we have to go through the host in order to do productions and loads. It is not a do-it-yourself tool."
"You are charged per user. It can get pretty expensive if you have a lot of users in your organization."
"I must clarify that I can only speak to pricing aspects, not technical features or functionality."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They are maintaining the per gigabyte pricing, and it's based on tiers of how much data you host with them."
"The pricing is extremely complicated."
"It's worth the money."
"Users are typically charged a fee per user account and a separate fee based on the amount of data processed and hosted."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
12%
Legal Firm
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Construction Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise2
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas eDiscovery Platform?
The solution is positioned in the mid-range pricing tier. There are both cheaper and more expensive solutions available in the market.
What needs improvement with Veritas eDiscovery Platform?
As a reseller, I am not familiar with specific features or details of the solution. Therefore, I cannot provide accurate information regarding areas for improvement.
What is your primary use case for Veritas eDiscovery Platform?
The solution is used by different types of organizations including a bank, a commercial organization, and an enterprise.
 

Also Known As

Relativity
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Webb & Tyler
Eversheds Sutherland, Bluesource, Transatlantic Reinsurance, NBC Universal, CMS Derks Star Busmann
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Commvault, Google and others in eDiscovery. Updated: August 2026.
909,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.