Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Veritas eDiscovery Platform vs kCura Relativity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

kCura Relativity
Ranking in eDiscovery
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Veritas eDiscovery Platform
Ranking in eDiscovery
23rd
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
1.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the eDiscovery category, the mindshare of kCura Relativity is 5.8%, up from 5.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas eDiscovery Platform is 1.7%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eDiscovery Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
kCura Relativity5.8%
Veritas eDiscovery Platform1.7%
Other92.5%
eDiscovery
 

Featured Reviews

HR
Legal Associate at Elevate
Easy to categorize documents and offers transparent view of documents
I found Relativity very useful because it's easy to categorize documents. If you get more complex litigation, like around 500,000 or 1,000,000 documents, it's easier to categorize them in Relativity. So, it's a more powerful tool for reviewing documents. I haven't faced any problems using Relativity yet. I found it very useful.
IB
Sales Manager at Beta Information Technology
Provides solid compatibility and integration with multiple solutions while having room for improvement in marketing and promotions
I must clarify that I can only speak to pricing aspects, not technical features or functionality. I am primarily involved in the commercial and management side. I cannot make judgments about backup solutions including Veritas eDiscovery Platform, Commvault, Rubrik, or Veeam. I can only discuss list prices, not discounted prices. I have not received full promotional or marketing information about the product. My review rating for this solution is 8 out of 10.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is easy for a beginner to learn to use Relativity."
"kCura Relativity is easy to use, and it is reliable."
"Caplets are a very good technical feature."
"The ease of navigation from dock to dock, and that kind of usability, is quite helpful."
"I like Relativity's blackout feature, as well as the Case Dynamics function."
"The initial setup was relatively straightforward."
"There are a lot of ways to QC your work and save your searches, and we had really good case support from the Relativity team."
"The compatibility with other solutions is a key feature; the solution can be configured and integrated with multiple solutions seamlessly."
 

Cons

"What I dislike about Relativity is that we have to go through the host in order to do productions and loads. It is not a do-it-yourself tool."
"There are a lot of bugs on the development side."
"They require more built-in support for some third-party applications."
"The price per user could be improved. We'd like for it to be more affordable."
"I would definitely not recommended it unless you have someone who has had experience with it and knows how to work the program."
"I haven't seen anything on AI merging with Relativity."
"The platform's integration of advanced AI features could further enhance its capabilities."
"I must clarify that I can only speak to pricing aspects, not technical features or functionality."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Users are typically charged a fee per user account and a separate fee based on the amount of data processed and hosted."
"The pricing is extremely complicated."
"It's worth the money."
"They are maintaining the per gigabyte pricing, and it's based on tiers of how much data you host with them."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eDiscovery solutions are best for your needs.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Legal Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise2
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for kCura Relativity?
It's expensive for an individual, but for a company, it's not expensive. And for an individual, I believe it's of no use.
What needs improvement with kCura Relativity?
I haven't seen anything on AI merging with Relativity.
What is your primary use case for kCura Relativity?
We use Relativity to code documents for their responsiveness, privilege, private information, confidentiality, and so on. We use it to categorize our documents into different categories depending o...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas eDiscovery Platform?
The solution is positioned in the mid-range pricing tier. There are both cheaper and more expensive solutions available in the market.
What needs improvement with Veritas eDiscovery Platform?
As a reseller, I am not familiar with specific features or details of the solution. Therefore, I cannot provide accurate information regarding areas for improvement.
What is your primary use case for Veritas eDiscovery Platform?
The solution is used by different types of organizations including a bank, a commercial organization, and an enterprise.
 

Also Known As

Relativity
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Webb & Tyler
Eversheds Sutherland, Bluesource, Transatlantic Reinsurance, NBC Universal, CMS Derks Star Busmann
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Commvault and others in eDiscovery. Updated: November 2025.
879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.