Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 9, 2024
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum are both prominent endpoint security solutions. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint seems to have the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Kaspersky boasts robust features despite higher costs.
Features: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint provides comprehensive protection capabilities, seamless integration with other Microsoft products, and efficient threat detection. Kaspersky's solution offers advanced threat detection, forensic capabilities, and detailed security insights. Kaspersky’s broader range of advanced features gives it an edge in this category.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint users highlight the need for enhanced reporting tools, greater compatibility with non-Microsoft environments, and improved user interface. Kaspersky users suggest improvements in the solution's complexity, ease of use, and mobile device management. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's compatibility issues are more frequently mentioned.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint benefits from straightforward deployment, especially within Microsoft-centric environments, and strong customer support. Kaspersky's deployment process is more complex but is backed by comprehensive support. Microsoft's easier deployment process within its ecosystem gives it an advantage in this area.
Pricing and ROI: Users find Microsoft Defender for Endpoint cost-effective with rapid ROI, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum is higher priced but seen as valuable due to its extensive security features. Microsoft’s favorable pricing and ROI make it more appealing for budget-conscious users.
