No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Juniper MX Series Routers vs NFWare Virtual CGNAT comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Juniper MX Series Routers
Ranking in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT)
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
35
Ranking in other categories
Routers (5th)
NFWare Virtual CGNAT
Ranking in Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT)
7th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Atul Torne - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Backbone Architect at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
Routing has supported carrier-grade services and has needed more affordable security options
The features of Juniper MX Series Routers that I find most useful are its nice scalability, redundant power supply, and routing engines. Redundancy is maintained in the router itself, including power redundancy and routing engine redundancy. The routers run mostly all the protocols required for the managed service provider, and security-wise, they also have good features, allowing us to provide IPSec VPN services from the routers. These are the basic, mostly used features that we are utilizing. For Deep Packet Inspection, Juniper MX Series Routers have firewall filters and commands related to routing engine protection, and then packet inspection features are configured. In traffic management with Juniper MX Series Routers, I leverage the policer, shapers, and quality of service parameters for traffic management. I also use OSPF traffic engineering features and MPLS-TE; these are a few features that I employ for traffic management.
Use NFWare Virtual CGNAT?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) solutions are best for your needs.
885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper MX Series Routers?
In terms of pricing, I would rate it comparatively affordable; compared to Cisco, it is quite affordable, and I believe we get a good discount.
What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?
In my opinion, to improve Juniper MX Series Routers, Juniper should make the MS-MIC card required for IPSec support more affordable, as it is currently costly. The renewal support charges are also ...
What is your primary use case for Juniper MX Series Routers?
My use case for Juniper MX Series Routers primarily involves using it as a provider edge router, P router, provider router, and a provider edge router. We call it P router and PE router, where we t...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series, Junos Address Aware
No data available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box
Information Not Available