Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Joget vs Mendix comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Joget
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
36th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mendix
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (2nd), Rapid Application Development Software (5th), Agentic Automation (5th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (10th), AI Software Development (11th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Joget is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mendix is 4.7%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Mendix4.7%
Joget0.6%
Other94.7%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Use Joget?
Leave a review
Mitchel Mol BGS - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Blue Green Solutions
Has improved development quality and speed but has introduced persistent IDE slowdowns
In recent years, the IDE has been more buggy and slower, and although there have been more features added, I would like to see more stability, as some areas that used to work for a fairly long time are now slower in my development, which feels like a step back. I choose a seven mainly due to the issues we've faced with slowdowns and bugs during development, while runtime has been very stable, and the overall output on Mendix platform is still good; there is definitely some room for improvement, and I would probably have given it an eight or even a nine if those issues weren't hurting my developer output for the past few years. Overall, Mendix platform is stable, but the IDE could be better.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise25
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Mendix?
We also use Mendix Enterprise Integration for complex business logic. It's a low-code platform, so we run Mendix in the Mendix Cloud.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mendix?
I do not have much experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because the sales or business team usually handles that, and as a developer, I don't have a clear idea.
What needs improvement with Mendix?
Mendix can be improved in that, while it is good at pricing, it lacks a small business budget project for startups wanting to build their portfolio. The company can improve in that perspective, and...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Atlassian 2. Bank of America 3. Coca-Cola 4. Dell Technologies 5. Equinix 6. FedEx 7. General Motors 8. Google 9. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 10. IBM 11. Intel 12. Johnson & Johnson 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kroger 15. L'Oréal 16. Mastercard 17. Merck 18. Microsoft 19. Nike 20. Oracle 21. PepsiCo 22. Procter & Gamble 23. SAP 24. Siemens 25. Sony 26. Toyota 27. Visa 28. Walmart 29. World Bank
Genzyme, TNT, Yahoo, Capgemini, Roche, D&B, Aegon, kpn, AZL, Sky, Arch, Penn State Univeristy, BancABC
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: November 2025.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.