Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jit.io vs Ox Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jit.io
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
51st
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
40th
Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
API Security (26th)
Ox Security
Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
38th
Ranking in Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
24th
Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
6th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Software Supply Chain Security (12th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Jit.io is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ox Security is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Hospitality Company
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Static Application Security Testing (SAST). Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.