Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Ox Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Aqua Cloud Security Platform
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (11th), Container Security (9th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (11th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (9th), DevSecOps (5th)
Ox Security
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Aqua Cloud Security Platform is 13.6%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ox Security is 25.0%, up from 6.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Supply Chain Security
Unique Categories:
Container Security
8.0%
 

Featured Reviews

LF
Aug 2, 2023
Provides workload protection and helps identify security misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and risks
I'm using it for workload protection. So, in most cases, for protecting containers, verifying Kubernetes configurations, cloud configurations, and identifying security misconfigurations, vulnerabilities, and risks I use it to demonstrate to customers because I'm a sales engineer. Many customers…
Use Ox Security?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Dealing with licensing costs isn't my responsibility, but I know that the licenses don't depend on the number of users, but instead are priced according to your workload."
"Aqua Security is not cheap, and it's not very expensive, such as Splunk, they are in the middle."
"The pricing of this solution could be improved."
"They were reasonable with their pricing. They were pretty down-to-earth about the way they pitched their product and the way they tried to close the deal. They were one of the rare companies that approached the whole valuation in a way that made sense for our company, for our needs, and for their own requirements as well... They will accommodate your needs if they are able to understand them and they're stated clearly."
"It comes at a reasonable cost."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.
792,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
23%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
6%
Hospitality Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Pharma/Biotech Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you think of Aqua Security vs Prisma Cloud?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
What do you like most about Aqua Security?
Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar to a sandbox environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aqua Security?
It comes at a reasonable cost. When compared to Prisma Cloud, it is more budget-friendly.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Aqua Security Platform, CloudSploit, Argon
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

HPE Salesforce Telstra Ellie Mae Cathay Pacific HomeAway
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Mend.io, Sonatype, JFrog and others in Software Supply Chain Security. Updated: July 2024.
792,694 professionals have used our research since 2012.