Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs Ox Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Aqua Cloud Security Platform
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (12th), Container Security (11th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (13th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (11th), DevSecOps (5th)
Ox Security
Ranking in Software Supply Chain Security
13th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2024, in the Software Supply Chain Security category, the mindshare of Aqua Cloud Security Platform is 8.3%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ox Security is 20.0%, up from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Supply Chain Security
 

Featured Reviews

Venugopal Potumudi - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 7, 2022
Reliable with good container scanning and a straightforward setup
The solution is used mainly to scan public clouds or containers. It can be used on demand. For example, when we go through the DevOps lifecycle, containers can be brought in based on demand for some use cases. We often need application onboarding and application changes. The containers do pop up…
Use Ox Security?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of this solution could be improved."
"Aqua Security is not cheap, and it's not very expensive, such as Splunk, they are in the middle."
"They were reasonable with their pricing. They were pretty down-to-earth about the way they pitched their product and the way they tried to close the deal. They were one of the rare companies that approached the whole valuation in a way that made sense for our company, for our needs, and for their own requirements as well... They will accommodate your needs if they are able to understand them and they're stated clearly."
"Dealing with licensing costs isn't my responsibility, but I know that the licenses don't depend on the number of users, but instead are priced according to your workload."
"It comes at a reasonable cost."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
7%
Hospitality Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you think of Aqua Security vs Prisma Cloud?
Aqua Security is easy to use and very manageable. Its main focus is on Kubernetes and Docker. Security is a very valuable feature and their speed of integration is very good. The initial setup was ...
What do you like most about Aqua Security?
Customers find it invaluable to have the ability to check for vulnerabilities in an image before deployment, similar to a sandbox environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aqua Security?
It comes at a reasonable cost. When compared to Prisma Cloud, it is more budget-friendly.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Aqua Security Platform, CloudSploit, Argon
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

HPE Salesforce Telstra Ellie Mae Cathay Pacific HomeAway
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonatype, Mend.io, JFrog and others in Software Supply Chain Security. Updated: October 2024.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.