JIRA Portfolio vs Planview Daptiv comparison

Atlassian and Planview are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Additionally, 98% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Planview users who would recommend it.

JIRA Portfolio

Read 58 JIRA Portfolio reviews

466 Views
206 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Planview Daptiv

Read 12 Planview Daptiv reviews

241 Views
105 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

JIRA Portfolio

Planview Daptiv

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Planview Daptiv based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed JIRA Portfolio vs. Planview Daptiv Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Portfolio vs. Planview Daptiv

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JIRA Portfolio

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (5th)

Planview Daptiv

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (16th)

Featured Reviews

Neeraj Chaudhari

Delivery Leader : Digital Productivity Studio at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

Aligns with agile frameworks for streamlined project management

User experience should be more intuitive. Currently, it's not that intuitive. Additionally, a lot of querying and customization is needed for reporting. If there could be some templates out of the box, it would be helpful. Making the report creation process faster and easier with drag-and-drop features would be beneficial.

Read full review

Antonio Lira

Territory Manager LATAM at LeaseWeb

It allows you to include empty document forms, which must be completed and signed on project execution.

I want to share another Daptiv PPM feature - the usage of templates and management All of us who have managed projects, or simply structured an action plan, have looked back on previous experiences by searching our personal files, either from past work, previous projects, university assignments,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Managing product development and managing inter-team communications are also valuable features."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The tool helps us achieve more within the stipulated timeline and budget."

"The most valuable feature of the JIRA Portfolio is the many features it provides, such as code integration, documentation, roadmap, and Eclipse. The solution is useful for product managers."

"Having an option to view dependencies between projects and teams is great."

"The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use."

"The initial setup is simple."

"The reporting feature is comprehensive and easy to use, which aids in planning and forecasting."

More JIRA Portfolio pros

"The timekeeping features are great and very helpful."

"Changepoint gives us a view of the project status and needs very clearly, which are things that we used to miss with MS Project and Excel."

"It's difficult to pinpoint just one most valuable feature, as there are many features that can be beneficial. For the specific use case of my client's project management office, they found the project management features of the application to be particularly valuable, such as project boards, reporting, and the ability to customize views. Additionally, task management and project scheduling were also highly utilized. However, capacity planning was not used as much as the others, as there was a lack of support from executives to invest in training and implementing it due to a lack of processes in place. The project planning features, dashboard, and reporting capabilities were considered the most valuable."

"I like the reporting engine, IBM Cognos, especially the analytics. That's a good tool. It's quite strong on the ideation and capacity-planning side, which is a huge plus."

"The powerful collaboration is definitely the most valuable and the fact that you can adjust flexibility to almost any methodology, and the easy creation of complete new functionalities without programming code."

Cons

"JIRA Portfolio's configuration management could be improved."

"It would be nice if it could provide an end-to-end solution for a project."

"The interface JIRA Portfolio could improve."

"There should be an integration of efforts between the cloud service providers' side and JIRA Portfolio."

"With Jira, an issue that arises is the length of time it takes to show certain data."

"The automation in JIRA Portfolio could improve, it takes some time. We have to do some other tactics to have the same integration. Manually integrating something will take more work than if it was automated, but the automation scripting in the solution is not simple."

"Portfolio is easy to scale, but we've had some difficulties with it regarding compliance and support."

"Their interface is a little unique and I think that's partly because the core of the product has morphed into several sub-products, but the underlying architecture has stayed the same on all of them in that it was originally a help desk ticketing system. It's a very tech-focused product and that's fair given its origins, but if they really want to expand their community of users, then they're going to have to move beyond that a little bit and polish it up."

More JIRA Portfolio cons

"I find the solution has an excessive amount of features. Many aren't even kept current. Some aren't useful at all. There's an overall lack of coherence within the solution. It can make the execution difficult. Many features can easily be eliminated and it would help streamline the solution. They should get rid of 80% of the features and then really focus on the leftover 20% to make it a really great product."

"It would also be nice to see some improvements on the IBM Cognos Analytics. There's still work to be done on the analytics side of things, like your condition formality."

"The areas that should be improved in Planview Daptiv are a subject that can be viewed differently depending on who you ask. I feel they should focus on excelling in one specific area rather than providing average capabilities in many areas. For example, their project planning software is satisfactory but not as advanced as Microsoft Projects. The same goes for the capacity planning tool and reporting capabilities, which can be improved upon by using custom Excel spreadsheets or by hiring a business analyst for additional support. In short, the biggest weakness of Daptiv is that it does not excel in any one area and only provides average performance."

"Expense management, simulation scenarios, and budget control could be great and useful features to include."

"This solution needs more standard connectors to other solutions."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be improved."

"The solution is offered at a high cost"

"We pay our fees annually, although monthly payments are also available."

"We have a license to use JIRA Portfolio, we are not using the free version."

"I rate JIRA Portfolio a five out of ten for its pricing."

"Portfolio is well-priced - a license for ten users costs $100 or $150 a month."

"The pricing of the solution is expensive."

"I do not believe that the product provides value for money since I feel that it is quite expensive."

More JIRA Portfolio pricing and cost advice

"It's a yearly license, but it's not an open license. It's based on users and their roles. So your administrator is priced differently from your timesheet user."

"The licensing is pretty complex. Each kind of user is a different price. It's approximately $300 per year. They charge additional fees for technical support and other additional services."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Educational Organization

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JIRA Portfolio?

The solution's tracking capabilities helped ensure we had full visibility into planned work and scheduled work.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Portfolio?

I am part of the delivery team and am not exposed to the commercial information. However, from what I understand, JIRA is competitively priced. It is not considered expensive in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with JIRA Portfolio?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs JIRA Portfolio

Compared 22% of the time

Jira Align vs JIRA Portfolio

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs JIRA Portfolio

Compared 11% of the time

Digital.ai Agility vs JIRA Portfolio

Compared 10% of the time

Smartsheet vs JIRA Portfolio

Compared 8% of the time

More JIRA Portfolio Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Daptiv

Compared 100% of the time

More Planview Daptiv Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Portfolio

April 2025

Download JIRA Portfolio product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Daptiv

June 2025

Download Planview Daptiv product report

Also Known As

Portfolio for JIRA

No data available

Overview

Jira Portfolio is an agile roadmapping tool designed to help teams build plans, envision the big picture, track progress, and share the process with stakeholders.

Jira Portfolio is planned based. A plan in Portfolio is a complete view of the tasks, teams, and release dates for your Jira projects.

Once you start to create a plan, there are three main factors you need to define:

Scope: A list of tasks that need to be carried out in order to complete the plan.

Teams: Who will be implementing the work? With the correct data in place, Portfolio can estimate how long it will take for the team to complete their tasks.

Releases: Your scheduled release date.

With Jira Portfolio, you can create a visual timeline to gain visibility across each of your teams and projects in a single place from a granular level and review cross-team and cross-project dependencies to prevent bottlenecks. This visibility can help you plan realistic release dates and manage your team’s capacity. The solution allows you to try out different scenarios with your roadmap and resources to help guide your decision making. Once you have a solid plan, you can easily integrate with Jira Software and commit your changes.

Jira Portfolio allows managers to easily add team members. The tool’s powerful scheduling algorithm assigns tasks to teams while taking priorities and dependencies into account so it can create a realistic forecast for project completion.

Jira Portfolio Benefits

Some of the top benefits of using Jira Portfolio include:

Roadmaps and roadmaps dependencies: Roadmaps list details about the tasks that need to be executed in order to complete a project, as well as predictions for when they will be completed, which teams are in charge of the task, and a list of resources they require. By setting dependencies on your team’s roadmaps, unnecessary bottlenecks are avoided.

Integration with Jira: Jira Portfolio is dynamically integrated with your Jira Software project data and constantly pulls your latest data from Jira Software, allowing you to plan your projects with updated information.

Envision scenarios: Create what-if scenarios and save them to Jira if you decide to adopt them.

Reporting: Share capacity reports and more to allow team members and stakeholders to gain visibility and insights into the process.

Task completion estimation methods: Estimate how long a specific task will take and compare these estimations with the actual time to completion to help assess team performance and efficiency and improve the accuracy of estimation calculations over time.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira Portfolio stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its roadmap creation tools and its flexibility.

Meeta L., a lead product manager at a tech vendor, says, “The valuable features of the JIRA Portfolio are the customization it provides which is very useful and the Agile project management capability.”

Juan P., a senior IT project manager at Avantica, writes, “Portfolio helps us increase the visibility of projects' status and management with remote workers who make up most of the company.”

Atlassian

Daptiv by Changepoint is an industry-leading Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) solution that helps businesses connect strategy to execution. Plan and monitor your portfolios from a top-down perspective to ensure you’re investing in the right projects to align with the overarching goals of your business.

Planview

Sample Customers

Rosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. Morgan

AOS Studley, Austrian Airlines, bpost bank, Employees Provident Fund, Stena Metall, VitalityHealth, Precor

Buyer's Guide

JIRA Portfolio vs. Planview Daptiv

June 2025

Free Report: JIRA Portfolio vs. Planview Daptiv

Find out what your peers are saying about JIRA Portfolio vs. Planview Daptiv and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Planview Daptiv report.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.