Jiffy.ai Automate vs UiPath Studio comparison

JIFFY.ai and UiPath are both solutions in the Robotic Process Automation (RPA) category. JIFFY.ai is ranked #38, while UiPath is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.0. Additionally, 88% of JIFFY.ai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Jiffy.ai Automate

Read 8 Jiffy.ai Automate reviews

632 Views
607 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

UiPath Studio

Read 5 UiPath Studio reviews

193 Views
89 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Jiffy.ai Automate

UiPath Studio

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jiffy.ai Automate and UiPath Studio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Jiffy.ai Automate vs. UiPath Studio Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jiffy.ai Automate vs. UiPath Studio

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jiffy.ai Automate

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

38th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Studio

Ranking in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

28th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Low-Code Development Platforms (23rd)

Featured Reviews

Reviewer92674

Head of RPA COE at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

You don't have to code; it is just drag and drop

They are still new in the market. Or, at least, they are still a small player. They require a lot of improvement in terms of learning material as well as the community developers. If you compare Jiffy.ai to an established solution, like UiPath, you can go to YouTube and find a lot of learning material posted by UiPath, partners, and other people in the community. However, for Jiffy.ai, you won't find that available in the market. Because of this it is very hard for us to find talent in the market. Most of the developers in the market are used to the bigger players. For Jiffy.ai, if you search a resume because you are trying to find someone who has used Jiffy.ai, you won't be able to find it. So, when we onboard a new person, we want them to learn this new system, but it is a bit hard for them to pick up because there are no external learning materials on the Internet. For training, they provide the foundation and advanced training. If you have other issues, they have a support portal, which shows a brief summary of the features. It's not very extensive, like Google Cloud Platform. Sometimes there are things that may not be available in the portal. While other products will also not have available the information in their portal, other people know it. So, you don't have in the community discussions about solutions to a problem that would not be available in the portal.

Read full review

VijayBhallamudi

Senior Business Analyst at Flix

Citizen developers have automated finance processes and created reusable modules across entities

There are some weaknesses, though nothing on the top of my mind at the moment. From a process and OCR point of view, for example, we are currently doing a use case about e-invoicing. We feel the accuracy that the OCR provides from UiPath Studio was not as high as we had initially anticipated. We had to not go with that module that UiPath Studio offers. UiPath Studio has an a la carte mode where you can buy specific functionalities without having to buy the whole package. We decided to test out a few other tools in the market and bought a customized tool specifically for OCR purposes because UiPath Studio's accuracy was not as great. It comes more on a use case-to-use case basis. Certain use cases that we try show that certain functionalities could be improved, and there is definitely a scope for improvement. That being said, the functionalities that we bought UiPath Studio initially for work pretty well. We wanted a centralized automation hub, an Orchestrator, and maximum license utilization for the bots we were purchasing. They are basic, but at the same time, they are easy to use. The ease of use is one of the main reasons why we still favor UiPath Studio. The AI and OCR parts are something we are looking to explore more in the coming year, and that will probably give us more insights into the functionalities and their value. At the moment, we use Oracle as our ERP. We have not had much success integrating with Oracle so far. UiPath Studio offers a lot of customized integrations for SAP, but not much for Oracle Cloud. We had to leverage our internal ERP in-house team to build integrations. We used Oracle Cloud integrations rather than UiPath Studio integrations with respect to ERP. Every conference or event that UiPath Studio organizes, when we have a chance to speak with someone from UiPath Studio, we bring up Oracle Cloud integrations. I believe that in Europe and the US, Oracle Cloud is growing in usage, so we would appreciate more effort focused there. However, with Salesforce, we used a couple of cases with customer service in our company, and we integrated with it very smoothly without any blockers. At the moment, we have not explored AI and ML capabilities of UiPath Studio as much as we should have. We conducted a series of process discovery workshops in our company, and the use cases we received did not require AI or ML functionalities because they were core finance operations, and we did well with just the regular functionalities of UiPath Studio. We are still looking forward to finding a case where we could leverage AI and ML capabilities. We do not want to use AI functionalities just because we want to use them. It is more of a situation where we ask if it is needed, and we are still looking forward to finding a case that demands the need for AI functionalities or a nice-to-have feature. At the moment, we still have not used or explored those things of UiPath Studio.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a one stop solution for automating process. The modular way that is assigned and works together follows a certain logic, and it encompasses a wide range of processes in a very structured and logical manner."

"It removes the burden of having to do some tasks manually. However, we are just using it in production for a single project. It saves us a lot of time in terms of extracting that information. So far, it has made a big impact."

"The biggest driver was the cost savings. We wanted to improve productivity and save costs. Therefore, we gave most of the mundane tasks currently being done by a human to a bot. Some of the mundane tasks were reading invoices and keying in the data. We are talking about 15,000 documents every day. That is a huge volume that needs a lot of people. With the bot, it is just a fraction of the cost, because there is a huge savings in terms of manpower."

"With the customization option, we can write custom expressions using its compatibility with Python or other programming languages."

"The most valuable feature is the computer vision or OCR. That has a lot of use cases in real life. A lot of man hours can be saved, as we've seen in the finance processes... The feedback I have gotten from the team is that the OCR is quite powerful."

"Its initial setup process was quite efficient."

"The way Jiffy.ai integrates into existing infrastructure has been great for us. Our company is pretty stringent when it comes to cyber security and integrating with our apps... We've definitely had very strong scrutiny over this platform and this work, and even within that, it's been really successful at being able to integrate."

"I found the invoice data extraction very exciting. It is really good."

"UiPath Studio is good for automating business processes and repetitive tasks within my company."

"Compared to other tools, UiPath Studio licensing cost is low."

"There are a lot of great things in UiPath Studio; whatever is required for the development is there, and I do not think I face any difficulty during the development of any use case from UiPath Studio's side."

"The fact that with UiPath Studio we can build reusable modules that we can use across automations has been specifically very useful to us as a company and team driving this project."

"Right now we have it deployed, and it is dealing with about 50% of our document volume."

Cons

"I believe this is also being addressed, but a lot of the platform work, as we were putting in new versions or making some updates, was, ironically, very manual. It's improved greatly, but I would imagine that's an area that they're probably still working on, on the backend, to help when it comes to what we need to do for platform support."

"They are still new in the market. Or, at least, they are still a small player. They require a lot of improvement in terms of learning material as well as the community developers. If you compare Jiffy.ai to an established solution, like UiPath, you can go to YouTube and find a lot of learning material posted by UiPath, partners, and other people in the community. However, for Jiffy.ai, you won't find that available in the market. Because of this it is very hard for us to find talent in the market. Most of the developers in the market are used to the bigger players. For Jiffy.ai, if you search a resume because you are trying to find someone who has used Jiffy.ai, you won't be able to find it. So, when we onboard a new person, we want them to learn this new system, but it is a bit hard for them to pick up because there are no external learning materials on the Internet."

"Initially, in version 3, Jiffy.ai did not have support for containerization. In our environment, we are heavy users of containers and container illustrators. So, the initial deployment option was running based on individual hosts that we deployed in the cloud. That created a singularity in the way that we deployed services in our system."

"The solution has just not closed the gap of being accessible to non-IT users. If you are a non-IT person, then this all looks like gobbledygook. Maybe that is something that can be improved upon."

"The solution's support services need improvement."

"The setup process could definitely be better."

"The UI or the UX has room for improvement. The approach for designing the workflow is not that straightforward. It's quite difficult."

"When using UiPath automation, we could just Google issues if we were stuck with something. In the initial days with Jiffy.ai, we could not get that type of information from Google because there wasn't much of a community."

"We feel the accuracy that the OCR provides from UiPath Studio was not as high as we had initially anticipated."

"On the improving side, concerning costing, I am not sure because the cost of the new product is very high."

"Some of the recent upgraded versions, the package sometimes create problems, so that has to be tested first and then it should be available in UiPath Studio, because everybody wants to use the latest package, but sometimes when we are using the latest package, it creates problems."

"We are not seeing improved ROI because the bigger chunks of use cases we have already addressed. When we take it down to the medium size, the cost of development and deployment is something which is prohibitive and it doesn't make a good financial business case."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is not expensive; it is quite cheap. The expensive part is to support and maintain it. Understandably, we engage them to do a lot of work that could have been done by our own staff, if we had an RPA team. I wouldn't hold that against them. It is just that the cost of support is on the higher side for us."

"I like that it is very cost-efficient."

"The pricing is quite competitive. As a small player in the market, they are quite aggressive in their pricing. With the features that they offer, it is quite worth the value."

"The solution's price is reasonable."

"Its license is yearly. There are no additional costs to the standard fee. It is a standard license."

"The pricing and license make sense. They have a model based on the concurrency of the workforce, which is very suitable in our case. The savings are great on the licensing cost."

"If cost is of concern, then start with Jiffy. If cost is not your main concern there are a few premium products out there, but they come with a huge price tag."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Studio?

The cost is another element which needs to improve because it's increasing and it is becoming prohibitive in some use cases. At the end of the day, you put in so much effort and the licensing and a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Studio?

Any RPA is never straightforward. It needs a lot of maintenance and it keeps requiring updates. There is a lot of maintenance required. Besides, the cost itself is not where it used to be six years...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Studio?

RPA is something which we deployed to address some of our documentation requirements or document management related requirements. That's what we are using it for. Right now we have it deployed, and...

See all answers

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 25% of the time

Nintex RPA vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 18% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 16% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 11% of the time

SAP Intelligent RPA vs Jiffy.ai Automate

Compared 11% of the time

More Jiffy.ai Automate Competitors

Dify vs UiPath Studio

Compared 100% of the time

More UiPath Studio Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jiffy.ai Automate

January 2026

Download Jiffy.ai Automate product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Studio

January 2026

Download UiPath Studio product report

Overview

Founded with the mission to radically change how enterprises automate complex business processes, JIFFY.ai puts the power of real-time innovation in business users’ hands. JIFFY.ai delivers an app-based, cognitive automation platform that includes capabilities ranging from intelligent document processing, natural language processing capabilities, RPA and Low Code/No Code development.

JIFFY.ai

UiPath Studio is a comprehensive tool for automating repetitive tasks. It's designed to enhance efficiency and productivity by providing a robust environment for building automation workflows quickly.

UiPath Studio offers a rich set of features catering to users looking to streamline operations through automation. Intuitive drag-and-drop functionality and seamless integration capabilities make it ideal for automating both simple and complex processes across diverse environments. Its detailed debugging tools and support for attended and unattended automation enable users to tailor their automation solutions to fit specific needs. By focusing on improving operational efficiency, UiPath Studio helps organizations to innovate while reducing manual efforts. It stands out for its adaptability and ease of implementation, fostering faster, more efficient process automation across industries.

What are the key features of UiPath Studio?

Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies the automation design process, making it more accessible.
Comprehensive Activity Library: Offers pre-built activities for common processes, enhancing workflow creation.
Advanced Debugging Tools: Facilitates error identification and resolution to ensure reliable automation.
Attended and Unattended Modes: Allows flexibility in automation execution, catering to different organizational needs.
Integration with Third-Party Applications: Enhances workflow capabilities by connecting with external systems.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating UiPath Studio?

Increased Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks to free up valuable employee time.
Cost Savings: Reduces labor costs by leveraging automation to handle routine tasks.
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands and more complex workflows with ease.
Improved Accuracy: Minimizes errors that can occur in manual processes.
Faster Deployment: Quickly implements with minimal disruption, accelerating time-to-value.

UiPath Studio is implemented across multiple industries, including finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, to automate data entry, billing operations, and compliance checks. In finance, it streamlines transactions and reporting. In healthcare, it manages patient data and administrative tasks. Manufacturing firms apply it to handle inventory and quality control processes, ensuring consistency and precision.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Southwest Airlines

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Jiffy.ai Automate vs. UiPath Studio

January 2026

Free Report: Jiffy.ai Automate vs. UiPath Studio

Find out what your peers are saying about Jiffy.ai Automate vs. UiPath Studio and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jiffy.ai Automate vs. UiPath Studio report.

See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.