No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Jamcracker vs Odin Service Automation [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jamcracker
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (63rd), Cloud Brokers (3rd)
Odin Service Automation [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Adalberto Barbosa Da Costa Lobato - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Solutions Architect at gwcloud.company
A scalable and easy-to-deploy solution that allows users to manage multiple cloud resources
We use the product to manage an educational area here in Brazil The solution allows us to manage multiple cloud resources from one place. It has the ability to provide both IaaS and SaaS services. Managing SaaS is a valuable feature of the solution. The product must improve its stability and…
it_user297870 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Vice President Cloud and Hosting Sales at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
It is compatible with the Application Packaging Standard.
We have a multi-tier subscription selling solution. Some of the billing functionality could be better enhanced. I would add more granular billing with more complex rules. For example, the average storage used in a month, or the minimum amount, whichever one is greater. For more detail: Existing APS realization supports monthly average billing. E.g. if we sell storage to the customer, OSA will calculate how much space was used in average during e.g. calendar month and charge customer for it. It does create a bunch of complications as showing for the customer an evidence that confirms the average number is typically complicated. Our customers base prefers to deal with end-of-the month values. In example with storage, it would imply billing customer for the usage based on usage at the last day of the month. Why is it better? 1) Much easy to explain to customers how it works 2) Much easy to show in our application that usage is in our application is equal to the usage customer was billed for. Implementing in our application “proof” of average billing is much more complicated 3) Finally – much faster adoption and much faster go-to-market for customers like Acronis

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution allows us to manage multiple cloud resources from one place."
"This allowed us to scale massively without a massive increase in resources."
 

Cons

"The product must improve its stability and speed."
"Support is customer facing, but we had some lack of technical expertise for the more difficult questions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is a little expensive."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Brokers solutions are best for your needs.
920,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Panasonic
OzHosting.com, Triple C, Keenondots, iiNet, KPN, Blacknight Solutions, Hostway