Klocwork and Ixia BreakingPoint compete in the software analysis and network testing categories. Ixia BreakingPoint appears to have the upper hand due to its superior feature set, although Klocwork is favored for its pricing and support.
Features: Klocwork offers effective static code analysis tools, strong integration capabilities, and comprehensive reporting. Ixia BreakingPoint provides robust network testing features with traffic generation and measurement, advanced simulation scenarios, and a strong competitive advantage in its domain.
Room for Improvement: Klocwork could improve by enhancing performance and scalability, offering more sophisticated detection capabilities, and addressing integration challenges. Ixia BreakingPoint faces criticism for complex configurations, a steep user learning curve, and the need for simplified usage.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Klocwork is known for straightforward implementation and supportive customer service, though some difficulties with system integration exist. Ixia BreakingPoint's deployment is complex, requiring advanced setup, but its strong customer service helps navigate initial challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Klocwork's economical setup costs align well with its return on investment. Ixia BreakingPoint, despite higher upfront costs, provides substantial ROI tied to its comprehensive testing capabilities and is seen as justifying its price.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Klocwork | 1.5% |
| Ixia BreakingPoint | 0.4% |
| Other | 98.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
By simulating real-world legitimate traffic, distributed denial of service (DDoS), exploits, malware, and fuzzing, BreakingPoint validates an organization’s security infrastructure, reduces the risk of network degradation by almost 80%, and increases attack readiness by nearly 70%.
Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
