


Sweet Security and Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management compete in the security and endpoint management category. Sweet Security seems to have the upper hand in real-time threat detection and personalized customer service, while Ivanti excels in automation and centralized management.
Features: Sweet Security focuses on deep runtime visibility and application layer security, excelling in API and microservices security. It offers customized dashboards and real-time production environment effectiveness. Ivanti provides strong endpoint visibility, AI-powered automation, and centralized management, reducing manual work with efficient patch management.
Room for Improvement: Sweet Security needs enhancement in product maturity, improved integration, and more robust dashboards. Users also point out UI and playbook integration improvements. Ivanti could improve its user interface, simplify navigation, and offer more intuitive reporting tools, alongside enhancements in AI accuracy and broader integration support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Sweet Security is praised for its support across public cloud environments and responsive customer service. It offers prompt technical support, reflecting high user satisfaction. Ivanti performs well in both on-premises and cloud settings, though its support is less highlighted than that of Sweet Security.
Pricing and ROI: Sweet Security is cost-effective, providing significant ROI by reducing tool reliance and enhancing proactive threat management. Ivanti's pricing is moderate and varies with endpoint numbers. Sweet Security aids strategic investment by pinpointing vulnerability trends, whereas Ivanti offers efficiency in endpoint management, with Sweet Security's proactive measures delivering broader strategic benefits despite potentially higher upfront costs.
It has saved about 90% of our time.
TotalCloud has generated overall savings of 30 to 40 percent across various departments.
CallStream helps us integrate and automate tasks.
We can remove or add licenses according to business requirements, and it is all controlled within the application.
The client was already paying for Microsoft Intune and was able to decommission Ivanti Neurons for UEM.
Tasks such as patching, software deployment, and troubleshooting that earlier took hours are now done in minutes.
The ROI is that we are not waiting for a breach but being proactive rather than reactive.
They are helpful, respond to my queries, and can answer any question.
Qualys's tech support is highly responsive, providing multiple ways to interact with them.
Qualys' customer service provides quality answers, but the response time is long, even though it is within the SLA.
I am concerned about consistently needing to call support for installing brand new solutions.
They are responsive, stick to time, and are enthusiastic about helping.
Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates.
They are there immediately, providing us with the best technical people, solving any issue we had.
They gave me a trial period, did multiple follow-ups, and were reviewing themselves the findings to actually understand how their product is performing.
I would rate customer support a nine out of ten because they maintain a competitive price, offer trial periods, provide follow-up, are very responsive, and are effectively hands-on in assisting and offering prompt service and support.
We started our organization about nine months back. We started with about 30 users, and we now have more than 100 users.
Our organization currently uses it to manage over 1200 web applications.
It is absolutely scalable, and I would rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
I would rate the scalability as nine out of ten.
There is no limitation in scalability; Ivanti Neurons for MDM is very scalable.
As a Microsoft consultant, I think Intune is always going to win over anything else if the client is already paying for an E3 or E5 license.
We don't need to scale it since it's all SaaS.
We are a robust enterprise with thousands of assets in the cloud or tens of thousands.
The user interface that I see doesn't make me very confident that I will be able to extract information in case I had hundreds or thousands of Kubernetes clusters or hundreds or thousands of hosts.
Overall, the support provided has been excellent.
It is a stable solution, which is why we chose it.
Continuous monitoring is crucial to ensure system stability and avoid vulnerabilities or threats.
We have not seen any downtime.
Regarding the self-healing capabilities, I would say it has reduced downtime by around thirty to forty percent.
It delivers very good UEM capabilities.
Sweet Security delivers cloud-native service updates seamlessly and requires very minimal operational effort.
I would rate the stability of Sweet Security a ten out of ten.
We have never had any issues with stability.
Ideally, the scanner should automatically detect and scan all subdomains, even if not explicitly defined, ensuring comprehensive vulnerability assessment.
Ideally, updates should be more immediate, enabling quicker implementation of solutions.
Our goal is to integrate all these functions into Qualys, creating a single dashboard for comprehensive security monitoring and management.
It would be helpful if the documentation could easily help us fix bugs on our own.
The test team or the testing procedures are flawed because they release new versions with numerous basic issues.
The history of patching is missing from the solution, making it a challenge.
The next great thing that Sweet Security can do is to turn toward IAC, how it is handled and enforced, to tackle potential breaches of policy before they really happen.
Maybe they can just show the actual signal and not show that there is a lot of vulnerabilities, but indicate which are important.
The main areas for improvement are related to how Sweet Security needs to be customized.
Qualys TotalCloud's pricing is currently acceptable, it is becoming increasingly expensive.
Pricing is managed by our finance team; however, Qualys TotalCloud offers cost-effective licensing flexibility.
Qualys TotalCloud is expensive, but it offers a premier solution with no headaches.
This is not a cheap solution.
Regarding pricing, I would say Ivanti Neurons for UEM falls at a nine out of ten.
The price for this solution seems to be reasonable for my company.
They're not cheap, but they're not as expensive compared to other companies.
Sweet Security contains very similar features at a much better pricing.
Sweet Security's pricing is quite fair and cost-effective by many users.
This view of risk helps reduce the work we would have to do to combine multiple sources to prioritize risk.
It will help cybersecurity professionals monitor the cloud and find vulnerabilities.
We are enjoying the new feature, FlexScan, which is valuable for Internet-facing VMs.
The most effective feature of Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management is its reactivity when a patch is released before its due date.
It integrates into InTune, which enables us to detect, diagnose, and fix issues without manual intervention.
AI-powered automation and self-healing are additional features that automatically fix common issues and reduce manual work.
Sweet Security's reporting tools enhance our insights into potential vulnerabilities and threats as they serve as our eyes and ears inside AWS, telling us what we are doing wrong so we can fix it.
Sweet Security enabled teams to see each detection of activity upon every request made from the application level towards the infrastructure, making it much easier and reducing the time for an analyst to understand what is really happening.
Sweet Security is well-scalable throughout multi-cloud environments and Kubernetes clusters because it relies on lightweight runtime telemetry and cloud native architecture, allowing it to support growing cloud infrastructure of any size.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 15 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 21 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Qualys TotalCloud enhances security posture across cloud environments with continuous monitoring, vulnerability management, and risk visualization, ensuring efficient threat assessment and automated remediation for improved cyber risk reduction.
Qualys TotalCloud offers a robust suite of security tools essential for organizations managing multi-cloud infrastructures. By integrating cloud accounts and automating workflows, it supports AWS, Azure, and GCP, offering comprehensive vulnerability management and zero-day detection. The platform's user-friendly design, combined with its extensive risk management and unified threat assessment capabilities, enables organizations to prioritize and remediate vulnerabilities effectively. TruRisk Insights provides clear insights on cyber risks, while the automation options streamline patch management and scanning processes. API integration across IaaS and SaaS environments further enhances resource allocation efficiency and saves time, addressing misconfigurations across cloud environments.
What are the most important features of Qualys TotalCloud?Qualys TotalCloud is deployed in sectors needing rigorous vulnerability management, such as finance and healthcare. Companies utilize it to secure multi-cloud environments like AWS, Azure, and GCP, focus on compliance, and integrate security into CI/CD pipelines to detect and remedy threats pre-deployment.
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management leverages AI-powered automation for comprehensive endpoint control. It offers centralized management, real-time visibility, efficient patch deployment, and supports diverse operating systems.
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management integrates AI-driven automation, providing a unified dashboard for streamlined IT operations. Its features include efficient patch management and real-time device monitoring, enhancing IT security and compliance. While comprehensive, improvements in dashboard simplicity, third-party integration, and AI feature clarity are desired. It serves multiple operating systems for seamless operation across various devices, and while effective, enhancements in UI navigation and reporting are suggested. Companies find it vital for centralized device management, compliance enforcement, and automated IT task handling.
What are the most important features?In industries like finance, education, and healthcare, Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is deployed for managing diverse device environments. It's used for securing sensitive data, ensuring compliance in regulated industries, and optimizing IT service desk operations. Its capabilities aid in provisioning devices and maintaining an up-to-date inventory, crucial for sectors with stringent security requirements.
Sweet Security offers advanced cybersecurity measures designed to protect enterprise-level networks from complex threats, providing efficient monitoring and robust protection capabilities.
Focused on sophisticated threat detection and network security, Sweet Security provides an enterprise-grade solution for cybersecurity challenges. It integrates seamlessly with existing systems, offering real-time analytics and threat intelligence. Its comprehensive approach ensures high-level data protection and security management, allowing organizations to focus on core functionalities.
What features make Sweet Security stand out?
What benefits or ROI can users expect from Sweet Security?
Implementation of Sweet Security across industries like finance, healthcare, and e-commerce demonstrates its versatility and effectiveness. In finance, it safeguards sensitive financial data; in healthcare, it ensures patient data privacy; and in e-commerce, it protects online transactions from fraud, making it an invaluable asset in today's digital landscape.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.