IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

InterSystems Ensemble vs Mule ESB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
InterSystems Logo
420 views|311 comparisons
MuleSoft Logo
15,990 views|12,702 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Microsoft and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: June 2022.
608,010 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
  • "This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
  • "Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
  • "This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
  • "I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."
  • "The price of the Mule ESB commercial version is expensive. However, they have a free community version."
  • "Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."
  • More Mule ESB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    608,010 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF on… more »
    Top Answer:Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integration… more »
    Top Answer:Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution.
    Ranking
    Views
    420
    Comparisons
    311
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    15,990
    Comparisons
    12,702
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    404
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Ensemble
    Learn More
    Overview
    Integration platform that includes an enterprise service bus along with business process management, event processing and data analytics.
    For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.
    Offer
    Learn more about InterSystems Ensemble
    Learn more about Mule ESB
    Sample Customers
    CysNET, Pennine Acute Hospitals, Kettering Health Network, Objectway, WS trends, Ontario Systems, Assurenet, 3M, Northgate Public Services, CentraCare
    Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Healthcare Company17%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm30%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    June 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Microsoft and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: June 2022.
    608,010 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    InterSystems Ensemble is ranked 22nd in Application Infrastructure while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. InterSystems Ensemble is rated 0.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Scaled easily, had good ROI and time to value, and didn't require taking care of the infrastructure". InterSystems Ensemble is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform and IBM BPM, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Service Bus, Red Hat Fuse and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.